Learning radiation oncology in Europe: Results of the ESTRO multidisciplinary survey  Jean-Emmanuel Bibault, Pierfrancesco Franco, Gerben R. Borst, Wouter Van Elmpt, Daniela Thorwhart, Maximilian P. Schmid, Kasper M.A. Rouschop, Mateusz Spalek, Laura Mullaney, Kathrine Røe Redalen, Ludwig Dubois, Christine Verfaillie, Jesper Grau Eriksen  Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology  Volume 9, Pages 61-67 (February 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.02.001 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Usefulness and effectiveness in current education. A 5-point scale was used to categorize qualitative answers (1 = less important to 5 = most important). Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology 2018 9, 61-67DOI: (10.1016/j.ctro.2018.02.001) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Obstacles to learning RO in Europe. A 5-point scale was used to categorize qualitative answers (1 = less important to 5 = most important). Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology 2018 9, 61-67DOI: (10.1016/j.ctro.2018.02.001) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Potential ways to improve education. A 5-point scale was used to categorize qualitative answers (1 = less important to 5 = most important). Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology 2018 9, 61-67DOI: (10.1016/j.ctro.2018.02.001) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions