Open Internet Standards

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICT Services Suppliers Briefing Thursday, 17 September 2009.
Advertisements

Electronic commerce EDI (8 decade) – base of EC – “Netscape” – propose SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) 1995 – “Amazon.com” “eBay.com” 1998 – DSL (Digital.
OpenStand and IEEE 802 Konstantinos Karachalios Managing Director, IEEE-SA 17 November 2012.
OpenStand and Collaborative Communities For innovation, solutions and market growth Kantara Initiative 3 June 2014 Summit Karen McCabe Senior Director,
Final Exam Part 1. Internet Regulation Internet regulation according to internet society states that it is about restricting or controlling certain pieces.
1.1 What is the Internet What is the Internet? The Internet is a shared media (coaxial cable, copper wire, fiber optics, and radio spectrum) communication.
OpenStand Principles for the modern paradigm for standards development.
CIS 1310 – HTML & CSS 1 Introduction to the Internet.
Youth for Development Topic Page on the Development Gateway
World summit on the information society Comments on the Visions & Principles of “ Information Society ” Takuo Imagawa, Osaka.
Chapter 1 Communication Networks and Services Network Architecture and Services.
The Internet Society (ISOC) Sebastián Bellagamba Manager – Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean
Overview of Issues and Interests in Standards and Interoperability Mary Saunders Chief, Standards Services Division NIST.
NETWORKING FUNDAMENTALS. Network+ Guide to Networks, 4e2.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
IANA Stewardship Transition & Enhancing ICANN Accountability Panel and Audience discussion | WSIS Forum | 5 May 2016.
Highlights on the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities Simão Campos ITU Telecommunications Standardization Bureau ITU and WHO Regional.
UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.
©Ofcom EU Communications package : State of Implementation Kip Meek, Senior Partner, Content & Competition Brussels, 30 May 2005.
Building a Better Connected World
eContentplus 2008 Work Programme
COMPLIMENTARY TEACHING MATERIALS
A policy framework for an open and trusted Internet
Baltic Sea Region Urban Forum for Smart Cities
What is it ? …all via a single, proven Platform-as-a-Service.
Introduction to Technology Infrastructure
STRATEGIC ACADEMIC UNIT “PEOPLE & TECHNOLOGIES”
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
TeleManagement Forum The voice of the OSS/BSS industry.
Chapter 1 Communication Networks and Services
Name Job title Research Councils UK
Organization and Knowledge Management
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
IEEE Initiatives in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems
UNIT 13: FINANCIAL REPORTING
IEEE Standards Association IEEE 5G Steering Committee update March 2016 Draft V0.2 9/17/2018.
Introduction to Technology Infrastructure
Internet Exchange Points (IXPs)
IEEE Standards Association IEEE 5G Steering Committee update March 2016 Draft V0.1 9/21/2018.
Should all the building blocks be yellow?
Vision Facilitation Template
Why the Multistakeholder Approach Works
COLLABORATIVE SECURITY An approach to tackling Internet
Internet Interconnection
The Brookings Institution
Karen Bartleson, President, IEEE Standards Association
OpenStand A Market-driven Paradigm for Global Standards
and LMAP liaison Document Number: IEEE R0
IFX Forum Overview September 28, 2015 © Copyright IFX Forum, Inc
OpenStand A Market-driven Paradigm for Global Standards
Lecture 1 Overview of Communication Networks and Services
IP and NGN Projects in ITU-T Jean-Yves Cochennec France Telecom SG13 Vice Chair Workshop on Satellites in IP and Multimedia - Geneva, 9-11 December 2002.
IEEE EAB Strategy 19 June 2011 New Brunswick, NJ.
Interoperability and standards for statistical data exchange
Youth Participation in Internet Governance
Fact: Standards Mean Business To industry, government and the bottom line
MICRO: Enhancing Competitiveness of Micro-enterprises in Rural Areas
Naveed Haq Manager Development, Internet Society Asia-Pacific
IEEE Initiatives in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems
and LMAP liaison Document Number: IEEE R0
Wrap-Up – NSF Site Visit 8 February 2010
ICT Policy سياسات تكنولوجيا المعلومات والاتصالات
Multimedia Training Kit
The Internet of Things (IoT)
Adoption of IPv6 Implementing the IPv6 protocol standard is essential for the Internet’s long-term growth. Introduction: The Internet operates by moving.
I4.0 in Action The importance of people and culture in the Industry 4.0 transformation journey Industry 4.0 Industry 3.0 Industry 2.0 Industry 1.0 Cyber.
Socio-Economic Impact of ESS
Cathrin Stöver (slides with the help of Sarah Jones, EOSC EB member)
Collaborative regulation in the digital economy
Presentation transcript:

Open Internet Standards Open standards facilitate the Internet’s growth, provide social and economic opportunities, and support creativity. Introduction: The success of the Internet and the World Wide Web in fueling an economic and social transformation impacting billions of people could not have occurred without the efficient standardization of so many underlying technologies. These global standards continue to being developed with a focus towards technical excellence, and they were deployed through the voluntary adoption and collaboration of many different stakeholders from all around the world. As a result, open standards can be seen as the cornerstone of the Internet’s success. They enable its existence, facilitate its growth, and provide a platform that supports creativity, as well as delivering social and economic opportunities for billions of users. Today, open standards are implemented all around the world in all kinds of Internet-enabled products and services. For example, they can connect people using an enterprise server in Singapore to people logged on via a solar-powered wireless network in Malawi.

Open Standards Drive interoperability and scalability Embody diverse perspectives and leverage expert knowledge Drive global innovation and encourage market competition Serve as building blocks for innovation Internet standards are the agreed-upon technical specifications that underpin the infrastructure of the Internet. There are two kinds of standards: Open standards are standards which are publicly available, and developed via processes that are transparent and open to broad participation. In contrast, proprietary standards are privately owned by one or more entities that control their distribution and access. Open standards are the building blocks that enable interoperability, compatibility, and consistency across markets. They let people and organizations set up new services and make them available across the rest of the Internet without requiring permission from anyone else. For example: the World Wide Web was developed, without permission from anyone, by a researcher in Geneva to organize and make more accessible the vast amount of information on the Internet. Web content is transmitted using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), which itself is open and free for anyone to use, and makes it possible for anyone to share a webpage or launch Web-based services without having to get permission or pay fees to do so. As a result, today’s Internet is full of interesting content developed by a wide range of sources — from school children to Facebook participants to international organizations. The Internet began as a research experiment in internetworking designed to allow different kinds of networks, each using its own proprietary set of protocols (or languages), to connect to and work with each other. The Internet Protocol (IP) is the core set of standards that facilitate information transit across multiple networks using different physical media, including copper wire, fiber optic cable, and wireless spectrum. The IP open standards are why transit networking devices, such as routers and servers, can exchange information amongst one another, even though they are made by different manufacturers. There are a broad variety of open Internet standards. These include standards that: facilitate email (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) and Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP)), convert IP addresses into human-friendly domain names (Domain Name System (DNS)), and enable Internet-based real-time communications technologies (Voice over IP (VoIP)). Everyone who is interested in developing an open standard can have a seat at the table. Participation is open to all. As a result, the development process has benefited from the best technical know-how, a diverse array of voices, and takes into account new conditions or requirements as new users come online. New and innovative technical advances are thus an outcome of broad participation in open standards. Application developers can take advantage of the levels of compatibility afforded by the standards, which in turn, helps developers create new applications that might not have been previously possible.

Key Considerations (OpenStand) Standards are considered to be open when they are developed, and made available, through processes that adhere to the following principles: Respectful Cooperation 1 Adherence to Principles 2 Collective Empowerment 3 Availability for Implementation and Deployment 4 Voluntary Adoption 5 Key Considerations: Standards are considered to be open when they are developed, and made available, through processes that adhere to the following five key principles: Respectful cooperation between standards organizations, whereby each organization respects the autonomy, integrity, processes, and intellectual property rules of the others. Adherence to principles including development through due process, broad consensus, transparent operation, balanced input, and open participation. Collective empowerment that strives for standards that: are chosen and defined based on technical merit, provide global interoperability, scalability, stability, and resiliency, enable global competition, serve as building blocks for further innovation, and contribute to the creation of global communities, thereby benefiting humanity. Availability for implementation and deployment via defined procedures to develop specifications that can be implemented under fair terms. Voluntary adoption with success determined by the market. These principles have been assembled and articulated through the OpenStand movement. This open approach to standards development has been affirmed by many of the key players in Internet-related standards development, including the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standards Association, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the Internet Architecture Board (IAB), the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), and the Internet Society. Source: OpenStand

Challenges Challenges: Process agility Standards can take a long time to develop because of the broad range of actors involved in their development. Lack of sufficient government recognition 01 Some jurisdictions only recognize standards set by a limited number of standard setting bodies. 02 Proprietary approaches Companies often implement functions in ways that do not build on existing open standards. 03 Challenges: Open standards and the processes that develop them are currently challenged in a number of ways. Proprietary approaches Companies often implement a particular function in ways that do not build on current open standards. The reasons for doing this might be: because no standard exists to meet their needs, because they decide to implement the same function without relying on standards for commercial reasons, or because they are unaware a standard exists. Process agility Open standards processes, by definition, promote broad participation. As a result, standards might take a significant amount of time to finalize. This sometimes results in a “deploy first, standardize later (if at all)” approach to developing services or applications that nevertheless leverage core Internet standards. Decreased flexibility in core Internet standards The use of devices, such as firewalls and middle boxes, has increased as the Internet has grown. This has resulted in only a limited portion of the original core Internet capabilities being effectively available to many Internet users. Many applications now use a small subset of Internet protocols and implement other functions in proprietary ways. These limiting subsets of functionality inhibit realization of the full potential of open Internet standards for flexible and innovative technology applications. This challenge is distinct from the individual proprietary approach because it is a response to a systemic network configuration. Lack of sufficient government recognition Currently, some government regulations and laws are often not able to legally reference open standards because some jurisdictions only recognize certain organizations for standard setting. 04 Decreased flexibility in core Internet standards Some applications use only a small subset of Internet protocols, and instead implement other desired functions in proprietary ways.

Open Internet standards can be advanced through the: Guiding Principles Open Internet standards can be advanced through the: Promotion of broad participation in Internet standards processes, Recognition of open standards in government laws and regulations, Consideration of solutions based on open standards as part of government procurements, and the Raising of awareness and encouraged adoption of OpenStand principles. Guiding Principles: Open standards are at the core of the Internet we know and love today — and open standards are key to its future growth and evolution. Open standards can be advanced in a number of ways: Promote broad participation in Internet standards processes Open standards benefit from broad input and participation. This input provides the best view of the real requirements faced by diverse Internet users. Broad participation means that the best thinking can be applied to developing a solution that meets these requirements. Recognize open standards in government laws and regulations Where appropriate, policy makers and regulators should reference the use of open standards so that both governments and the broader economy can benefit from the services, products, and technologies that are built on such standards. Governments should work to ensure that standards developed through open processes (including those developed through the IETF, W3C, and the IEEE) are fully recognized. Ensure consideration of solutions based on open standards as part of government procurements Governments can support open standards by ensuring that government technology procurements are open and supportive of solutions built on open standards. Governments should identify and remove unnecessary regulatory obstacles that block the take up of open standard solutions in government procurement. Promote awareness and encourage adoption of OpenStand principles Governments should ensure that their standards bodies are aware of the OpenStand principles. Governments should also encourage the adoption of these principles in the international standards activities in which they participate. Generally speaking, open standards policy actions should encourage decision-making with a sense of equity and fairness among participants based on broad consensus, transparency, and thoughtful consideration of diverse interests and viewpoints, as well as the ability for any interested and informed party to participate and contribute in the development of standards or decisions.

Download the Briefing Paper. Thank You: Open Internet standards are a core tenet of the Internet. They allow anyone to set up a new online service and to make it available to everyone else connected to the Internet without requiring permission from anyone else. Broad, multistakeholder participation in Internet standards processes, and the recognition by governments and regulatory bodies of open standards, are of critical importance to the continued growth and evolution of the Internet.