Normal Movement Selectivity in Autism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Normal Movement Selectivity in Autism Ilan Dinstein, Cibu Thomas, Kate Humphreys, Nancy Minshew, Marlene Behrmann, David J. Heeger Neuron Volume 66, Issue.
Advertisements

Disrupted Neural Synchronization in Toddlers with Autism Ilan Dinstein, Karen Pierce, Lisa Eyler, Stephanie Solso, Rafael Malach, Marlene Behrmann, Eric.
Soyoun Kim, Jaewon Hwang, Daeyeol Lee  Neuron 
Disrupted Neural Synchronization in Toddlers with Autism
Elizabeth V. Goldfarb, Marvin M. Chun, Elizabeth A. Phelps  Neuron 
Lior Shmuelof, Ehud Zohary  Neuron 
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Decoding Wakefulness Levels from Typical fMRI Resting-State Data Reveals Reliable Drifts between Wakefulness and Sleep  Enzo Tagliazucchi, Helmut Laufs 
Analysis of the Neuronal Selectivity Underlying Low fMRI Signals
Two Cortical Systems for Reaching in Central and Peripheral Vision
Linking Electrical Stimulation of Human Primary Visual Cortex, Size of Affected Cortical Area, Neuronal Responses, and Subjective Experience  Jonathan.
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Martin O'Neill, Wolfram Schultz  Neuron 
Mismatch Receptive Fields in Mouse Visual Cortex
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Michael L. Morgan, Gregory C. DeAngelis, Dora E. Angelaki  Neuron 
Scale-Invariant Movement Encoding in the Human Motor System
Inducing Gamma Oscillations and Precise Spike Synchrony by Operant Conditioning via Brain-Machine Interface  Ben Engelhard, Nofar Ozeri, Zvi Israel, Hagai.
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2007)
Aleksander Sobczyk, Karel Svoboda  Neuron 
Unreliable Evoked Responses in Autism
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
A Switching Observer for Human Perceptual Estimation
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Motor Learning Is Optimally Tuned to the Properties of Motor Noise
Selective Entrainment of Theta Oscillations in the Dorsal Stream Causally Enhances Auditory Working Memory Performance  Philippe Albouy, Aurélien Weiss,
Adaptive Surround Modulation in Cortical Area MT
Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Synesthesia
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Motor Learning with Unstable Neural Representations
Lior Shmuelof, Ehud Zohary  Neuron 
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Rethinking Motor Learning and Savings in Adaptation Paradigms: Model-Free Memory for Successful Actions Combines with Internal Models  Vincent S. Huang,
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
A Switching Observer for Human Perceptual Estimation
BOLD fMRI Correlation Reflects Frequency-Specific Neuronal Correlation
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Eye Movement Preparation Modulates Neuronal Responses in Area V4 When Dissociated from Attentional Demands  Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Tirin Moore  Neuron 
John T. Arsenault, Koen Nelissen, Bechir Jarraya, Wim Vanduffel  Neuron 
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Masayuki Matsumoto, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Value-Based Modulations in Human Visual Cortex
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Elena A. Allen, Erik B. Erhardt, Vince D. Calhoun  Neuron 
Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation
Daniel E. Winkowski, Eric I. Knudsen  Neuron 
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Michael A. Silver, Amitai Shenhav, Mark D'Esposito  Neuron 
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
The Normalization Model of Attention
Brain Mechanisms for Extracting Spatial Information from Smell
Sébastien Marti, Jean-Rémi King, Stanislas Dehaene  Neuron 
Motor Planning, Not Execution, Separates Motor Memories
John T. Serences, Geoffrey M. Boynton  Neuron 
Kristy A. Sundberg, Jude F. Mitchell, John H. Reynolds  Neuron 
Taosheng Liu, Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco  Neuron 
Two Cortical Systems for Reaching in Central and Peripheral Vision
Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Synesthesia
Yuko Yotsumoto, Takeo Watanabe, Yuka Sasaki  Neuron 
Maxwell H. Turner, Fred Rieke  Neuron 
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Michael A. Silver, Amitai Shenhav, Mark D'Esposito  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

Normal Movement Selectivity in Autism Ilan Dinstein, Cibu Thomas, Kate Humphreys, Nancy Minshew, Marlene Behrmann, David J. Heeger  Neuron  Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 461-469 (May 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.034 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cortical Responses during Movement Observation Experiment Green: Brain areas exhibiting significantly stronger responses during observation than rest. Orange: Brain areas exhibiting visual adaptation, as reflected in significantly stronger responses during nonrepeat blocks (when observing different hand movements) than repeat blocks (same hand movement repeatedly). White ellipses outline the general location of the ROIs, which were selected separately for each subject. Neuron 2010 66, 461-469DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cortical Responses during Movement Execution Experiment Blue: Brain areas exhibiting significantly stronger responses during execution than rest. Orange: Brain areas exhibiting motor adaptation, as reflected in significantly stronger responses during nonrepeat blocks (when executing different hand movements) than repeat blocks (same hand movement repeatedly). White ellipses outline the general location of the ROIs, which were selected separately for each subject. Neuron 2010 66, 461-469DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Region of Interest Analysis of the Movement Observation Experiment (Top) and the Movement Execution Experiment (Bottom) Green: Mean response amplitudes when observing different (nonrepeating) hand movements, for the autism (light) and control (dark) groups. Blue: Mean response amplitudes when executing different (nonrepeating) hand movements, for the autism (light) and control (dark) groups. Orange: Mean response amplitudes when hand movements were repeated, for the autism (light) and control (dark) groups. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate statistically significant adaptation (p < 0.05, Bonferroni corrected). Neuron 2010 66, 461-469DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Adaptation Index for Individuals from the Autism Group (Open Squares) and Control Group (Filled Circles) Top: Visual adaptation index in visual and mirror system ROIs. Bottom: Motor adaptation index in motor and mirror system ROIs. The index was computed as the difference between nonrepeat and repeat responses divided by the absolute nonrepeat response (see Experimental Procedures). Solid lines denote the average across either the autistic or control subjects. Neuron 2010 66, 461-469DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Within-Subject Variability Variance across blocks. Average fMRI responses in left visual areas from a typical autistic subject (top) and control subject (bottom) during movement observation blocks. Responses from blocks where different hand movements were presented (gray) and blocks where the same hand movement was presented repeatedly (black) were averaged separately. Error bars (SEM across blocks) are larger for the autistic than the control subject. Neuron 2010 66, 461-469DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Within-Subject Variability Standard deviation across blocks. Average SD across blocks in the movement observation experiment (top) and movement execution experiment (bottom) for repeat blocks (white, autism; medium gray, controls) and nonrepeat blocks (light gray, autism; dark gray, controls). Asterisks indicate significantly larger SD in the autism group (p < 0.05, randomization test, see Experimental Procedures). Error bars represent SEM across individuals. Neuron 2010 66, 461-469DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Within-Subject Variability Goodness of fit. Average goodness of fit between the expected fMRI responses and the measured fMRI responses in the movement observation experiment (top) and movement execution experiment (bottom) for the autism group (white) and control group (gray). Asterisks indicate significant goodness-of-fit difference between groups (p < 0.05, randomization test, see Experimental Procedures). Error bars represent SEM. Neuron 2010 66, 461-469DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.034) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions