A comparison of two techniques for ultrasound guided infraclavicular block Bigeleisen P , Wilson M British Journal of Anaesthesia Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages 502-507 (April 2006) DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael024 Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Positioning of the ultrasound probe and the needle using (a) MIT or (b) LIT. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96, 502-507DOI: (10.1093/bja/ael024) Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Positions of the medial, lateral and posterior cords when the arm is positioned for MIT. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96, 502-507DOI: (10.1093/bja/ael024) Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Positions of the medial, lateral and posterior cords when the arm is positioned for LIT. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96, 502-507DOI: (10.1093/bja/ael024) Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Positions of the medial, lateral and posterior cords along the axis of the axillary artery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96, 502-507DOI: (10.1093/bja/ael024) Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions
Fig 5 This figure shows the sites (1–4) which were used to image brachial plexus, vessels, lung and ribs. Please refer to the text for details. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96, 502-507DOI: (10.1093/bja/ael024) Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions