Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Alex Dajkovic, Ganhui Lan, Sean X. Sun, Denis Wirtz, Joe Lutkenhaus 
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
TANGO1 Facilitates Cargo Loading at Endoplasmic Reticulum Exit Sites
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
HIV-1 Buds and Accumulates in “Nonacidic” Endosomes of Macrophages
The Plasticity of the Hsp90 Co-chaperone System
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (January 2016)
Joseph D. Mancias, Jonathan Goldberg  Molecular Cell 
Kumaran S. Ramamurthi, Richard Losick  Molecular Cell 
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Distinct Autophagosomal-Lysosomal Fusion Mechanism Revealed by Thapsigargin- Induced Autophagy Arrest  Ian G. Ganley, Pui-Mun Wong, Noor Gammoh, Xuejun.
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages e6 (April 2018)
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Caitlin M. McDonold, J. Christopher Fromme  Developmental Cell 
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Shijiao Huang, Danming Tang, Yanzhuang Wang  Developmental Cell 
How Integration of Positive and Negative Regulatory Signals by a STAND Signaling Protein Depends on ATP Hydrolysis  Emélie Marquenet, Evelyne Richet 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Matthias P. Machner, Ralph R. Isberg  Developmental Cell 
Sharon M Sweitzer, Jenny E Hinshaw  Cell 
Protein Translocation Is Mediated by Oligomers of the SecY Complex with One SecY Copy Forming the Channel  Andrew R. Osborne, Tom A. Rapoport  Cell  Volume.
Peroxisomes: Another Branch of the Secretory Pathway?
Thomas J. Pucadyil, Sandra L. Schmid  Cell 
Susan K Lyman, Randy Schekman  Cell 
Brian C. Richardson, Caitlin M. McDonold, J. Christopher Fromme 
Jason C. Young, Nicholas J. Hoogenraad, F.Ulrich Hartl  Cell 
Yi-Ping Hsueh, Eunjoon Kim, Morgan Sheng  Neuron 
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
A Biochemical Function for the Sm Complex
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (August 2003)
Ruth Halaban, Elaine Cheng  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Kohei Arasaki, Derek K. Toomre, Craig R. Roy  Cell Host & Microbe 
A Stable Prefusion Intermediate of the Alphavirus Fusion Protein Reveals Critical Features of Class II Membrane Fusion  Claudia Sánchez-San Martín, Hernando.
Detecting Folding Intermediates of a Protein as It Passes through the Bacterial Translocation Channel  Hiroshi Kadokura, Jon Beckwith  Cell  Volume 138,
The Rab GTPase Ypt1p and Tethering Factors Couple Protein Sorting at the ER to Vesicle Targeting to the Golgi Apparatus  Pierre Morsomme, Howard Riezman 
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
The Innate Immune Sensor LGP2 Activates Antiviral Signaling by Regulating MDA5- RNA Interaction and Filament Assembly  Annie M. Bruns, George P. Leser,
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
BiP Acts as a Molecular Ratchet during Posttranslational Transport of Prepro-α Factor across the ER Membrane  Kent E.S Matlack, Benjamin Misselwitz, Kathrin.
Empty Site Forms of the SRP54 and SRα GTPases Mediate Targeting of Ribosome– Nascent Chain Complexes to the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Peter J Rapiejko, Reid.
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
A novel Cdc42Hs mutant induces cellular transformation
Elva Dı́az, Suzanne R Pfeffer  Cell 
Unassembled Ig Heavy Chains Do Not Cycle from BiP In Vivo but Require Light Chains to Trigger Their Release  Marc Vanhove, Young-Kwang Usherwood, Linda.
Alex Dajkovic, Ganhui Lan, Sean X. Sun, Denis Wirtz, Joe Lutkenhaus 
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
The Engagement of Sec61p in the ER Dislocation Process
Presentation transcript:

Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages 605-617 (August 2005) Sar1p N-Terminal Helix Initiates Membrane Curvature and Completes the Fission of a COPII Vesicle  Marcus C.S. Lee, Lelio Orci, Susan Hamamoto, Eugene Futai, Mariella Ravazzola, Randy Schekman  Cell  Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages 605-617 (August 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sar1p Deforms Membranes in a Nucleotide-Dependent Manner Liposomes were incubated in the presence or absence of 5 μM Sar1p and the indicated nucleotide and examined by thin-section EM. (A) Liposomes incubated with Sar1p and GTP were transformed into narrow tubules up to 1 μm long (inset i). Tubules were often contorted (arrowheads), could be seen extending from spherical liposomes (arrows), and occasionally appeared to form reticular networks (inset ii). Reactions containing Sar1p and GDP (B) resembled untreated liposomes (C). Bar = 100 nm. Cell 2005 122, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Membrane Curvature Is Generated by the N-Terminal Helix of Sar1p (A) Sedimentation analysis of liposome binding by either wt-Sar1p or Δ23-Sar1p, which contains a hexahistidine tag in place of the 23 residue N-terminal helix. Sar1p proteins (0.7 μM) were incubated with GMP-PNP and either normal liposomes or liposomes supplemented with 5 mol% DOGS-NTA-Ni (Ni-liposomes). Imidazole (20 mM) was added where indicated. (B) wt-Sar1p or Δ23-Sar1p (1 μM) was incubated with Ni-liposomes in the presence or absence of 20 nM Sec12ΔCp, the cytosolic domain of Sec12p. Exchange of GDP for GTP is accompanied by an increase in the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of Sar1p. Subsequent addition of Sec23/24p (105 nM) and Sec13/31p (90 nM) stimulated GTP hydrolysis. (C) Ni-liposomes (top) were incubated with 5 μM of either wt-Sar1p (middle) or Δ23-Sar1p (bottom) and GTP and examined by EM. Bar = 200 nm. (D) Morphometric analysis of liposome tubules generated by various concentrations of either wt-Sar1p or Δ23-Sar1p, in the presence of either GTP (+) or GDP (−). The surface density of tubules was measured from 24 micrographs for each sample (±SEM). Cell 2005 122, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Morphology of Ni-Liposomes Incubated with Either wt-Sar1p or Δ23-Sar1p, Sec23/24p, and Sec13/31p Ni-liposomes were incubated with hexahistidine-tagged Sec23/24p (450 nM) and Sec13/31p (580 nM), GMP-PNP, and 1 μM of either (A) wt-Sar1p or (B) hexahistidine-tagged Δ23-Sar1p and examined by EM. (A) Apparently free vesicles (arrowheads) and (B) numerous multibudded liposome profiles (arrows) were observed. Bar = 100 nm. (C and D) Morphometric analysis of Ni-liposomes incubated with the indicated Sar1p and (C) the full COPII coat (mean ± SEM, n = 12) or (D) Sec23/24p only (mean ± SEM, n = 24). Cell 2005 122, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Direct Recruitment of Sec23/24p and Sec13/31p to Microsomes Does Not Bypass the Requirement for Full-Length Sar1p in Vesicle Budding Microsomal membranes supplemented with DOGS-NTA-Ni were incubated with the indicated concentrations (in μg/ml) of wt-Sar1p or Δ23-Sar1p, hexahistidine-tagged Sec23/24p and Sec13/31p, and either GMP-PNP (+) or GDP (−). Incubations were then examined for (A) coat recruitment or (B) vesicle budding. (A) Membrane recruitment of Sec23/24p and Sec13/31p was assessed by sedimenting the membranes through a 0.2 M sucrose cushion. The membrane pellet was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using antibodies to Sec24p, Sec31p, the ER-Golgi protein Erv46p as a loading control, and radiolabeled secondary antibody. (B) Vesicles were separated from the donor membranes by a 16,000 × g centrifugation step, and budding efficiency was assessed by concanavalin A-precipitation of 35S-gpαf (mean ± SD of duplicate reactions). (C) Recruitment of gpαf and Sed5p into Sec23/24p-cargo prebudding complexes was examined by incubating Ni-microsomes with 20 μg/ml of the indicated proteins and either GMP-PNP (+) or GDP (−). Membranes were centrifuged through a sucrose cushion and solubilized with 0.5% digitonin, and hexahistidine-tagged Sec23/24p precipitated using Ni-NTA beads. Coprecipitating cargo proteins were assessed by autoradiography (35S-gpαf) or immunoblotting (Sed5p). Cell 2005 122, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Point Mutants of the N-Terminal Helical Domain of Sar1p Reduce Membrane Tubulation (A) Helical-wheel plot of residues 1–18 of Sar1p, with the sequence of the full 23 amino acid helix below. Hydrophobic residues are shaded, and colored residues were mutated to alanine, with the mutant designation shown below the sequence (e.g., n1-Sar1p = W4A). (B) Flotation assay of liposome binding. Wild-type or mutant Sar1p (0.7 μM) was incubated with major-minor liposomes, Sec23/24p (105 nM) and Sec13/31p (175 nM), in the presence of GMP-PNP (+) or GDP (−). COPII proteins recruited to liposomes were collected by flotation. (C) Tubulation of liposomes incubated with GTP and 5 μM of either wt-Sar1p or the indicated n-Sar1p mutants was assessed by EM. Bar = 200 nm. (D) Morphometric analysis of liposome tubules generated by either wt-Sar1p or the n-Sar1p mutants at the indicated concentration (mean ± SEM, n = 36). Cell 2005 122, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 n-Sar1p Mutants Are Defective in Vesicle Budding despite Normal Recruitment of Coat and Cargo Proteins (A) Budding efficiency of either wt-Sar1p or the indicated n-Sar1p mutant. Microsomal membranes containing 35S-gpαf were incubated with 5 μg/ml of the indicated Sar1p, Sec23/24p, and Sec13/31 (10 μg/ml each), and GTP (+) or GDP (−). Vesicle budding was assessed as in Figure 4B (mean ± SD of duplicate reactions). (B) Budding efficiency was examined using various concentrations of the indicated Sar1p with the amount of Sec23/24p and Sec13/31p held constant (10 μg/ml). Budding reactions contained GMP-PNP or GDP (mean ± SD of duplicate reactions). (C) Recruitment of Sec23/24p to microsomal membranes was determined for each of the n-Sar1p mutants. Membranes were incubated with Sar1p (1 μg/ml) and Sec23/24p (10 μg/ml) and then sedimented through a sucrose cushion. Membrane bound Sec23/24p was quantified by immunoblot and autoradiography using antibodies against either Sec23p or Sec24p and a radiolabeled secondary antibody. (D) Formation of prebudding complexes containing Sar1p-Sec23/24p-cargo was examined by incubating microsomes with 20 μg/ml of the indicated Sar1p, Sec23/24p, and either GMP-PNP (+) or GDP (−). Isolation of prebudding complexes was performed as in Figure 4C, and coprecipitating cargo proteins were assessed by autoradiography (35S-gpαf) or immunoblotting (Sed5p and Sec22p). Cell 2005 122, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 In Vivo Analysis of n-sar1 Mutants (A) Complementation of sar1 disruption by integration of either wild-type SAR1 or the n-sar1 helix mutants was examined by growth on 5-FOA to cure cells of the plasmid-borne copy of wild-type SAR1. Unlike the Δsar1 parental strain, each of the mutants was viable. (B) Pulse-chase analysis of Gas1p maturation from the ER precursor form (p) to the Golgi-modified mature form (m). (C) Quantitation of Gas1p transport, expressed as the amount of Golgi-modified protein relative to total Gas1p. The mean (±SD) of two independent experiments is shown. Cell 2005 122, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Morphology of Liposomes Incubated with wt-Sar1p or n1-Sar1p and the Full COPII Coat Major-minor liposomes were incubated with 3.7 μM of either (A) wt-Sar1p or (B) n1-Sar1p and Sec23/24p (450 nM), Sec13/31p (580 nM), and GMP-PNP. (A) Incubations with wt-Sar1p generated coated “thin” tubules (arrowheads), buds (double arrows), as well as apparently free vesicles (asterisks) and (A′) strings of vesicles bearing constrictions at regular intervals. (B and B′). In contrast, n1-Sar1p generated a mixture of tubules of variable diameter, from thin tubules (<45 nm; arrowheads) to thick tubules (≥45 nm; arrows) of significantly larger diameter that were heavily coated with COPII proteins but displayed few if any constrictions. (inset) High magnification of the lattice-like coat observed on the large-diameter tubules. Bar = 100 nm. (C) Morphometric analysis revealed the majority of tubules produced by n1-Sar1p were of large diameter (45–105 nm), with far fewer constricted tubules relative to incubations with wt-Sar1p (mean ± SEM, n = 12). Cell 2005 122, 605-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions