Residents’ questionnaire survey November 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Update Riding Mill Parish Council 28 April.
Advertisements

Somerford Keynes Parish Council Neighbourhood Development Plan PARISH PRESENTATION 19 th JANUARY 2015.
Issues and Options Consultation September Plans A Neighbourhood Plan Our vision and local planning policies Housing, Business and Employment, Tourism,
WJEC (B) GCSE Geography Theme 1 Topic 4 Click to continue Hodder Education Revision Lessons Changing housing and service provision in more developed countries.
The Rural Challenge Achieving sustainable rural communities for the 21 st Century.
STARTER ACTIVITY In pairs, discuss why you think we need more homes in the UK. Try to think of at least four reasons. Where do you think these new homes.
 Site: actual land upon which the settlement is built, e.g. dry point, gap town;  Situation: position of settlement in relation to the surrounding area;
Tiddington 4 Village Plan Survey Results – Roads Two thirds of respondents wanted a controlled crossing of the A418 in Tiddington, with the very large.
Settlement Boundaries Where do they come from? What do they do? What is the future?
Wootton Wawen Neighbourhood Plan Wootton Wawen Neighbourhood Plan Welcome Survey feedback Current status of activities What next?
Meeting with Governors Kislingbury Primary School December
Appleton with Eaton Community Plan 2009 Questionnaire responses.
Neighbourhood Plan Upper Beeding Parish is 7.25 square miles (4637 acres) in size. The main settlements are Upper Beeding, Small Dole and Edburton. Only.
How does it look? Imagine a small area of land – a plot on a site big enough for one ‘executive style’ house. Here it is, with some figures Variation 1:
Phase 1 Consultation Results 23 rd September 2014.
Housing Development within the Parish of Shearsby Presentation 10 September 2015.
Planning for the future of our district Core strategy options Presentation to C4B Associates February 2010.
Drafting the NDP 23 rd June areas for NDP to focus on Housing Development Facilities Parking Commercial.
Neighbourhood Planning Consultation FULL REPORT, 23 SEPTEMBER 2015.
Shenstone Neighbourhood Plan Working Groups launch event 18 th June 2013.
Woodford Neighbourhood Forum Questionnaire Preliminary Analysis of Results.
Powered by Earswick Village Residents Questionnaire Key Findings October 2015.
Sustainable Development and Neighbourhood Plans Chris Gooding and Bill Bloxsome Data Orchard/Community First.
Neighbourhood Development Plan December 1 st, 2013.
Kislingbury Neighbourhood Plan 2013 Questionnaire Analysis 1.
Housing; what we know so far : Target - 5 to 7 Houses a year Need is for - Affordable Homes -Starter Homes -Down sizer homes -Retirement homes.
Grinshill Community Meeting Welcome Tom Wycherley Grinshill Parish Council.
Bere Regis: Neighbourhood Plan Setting The Scene.
‘People, Homes and Jobs’ Local Plan Consultation 2015 PPCLG 27 January 2016.
FERNHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Results of Questionnaire James Cottam Chairman Fernhurst Parish Council.
Initial Budget Proposals 2015/16 Initial Budget Proposals 2015/16 Presentation by Leader of the Council and Portfolio holder for Performance and Efficiency.
Funding How much does it cost to produce a Neighbourhood Plan? The cost depends entirely on the scope, complexity, the type and scale of engagement & consultation,
12 th April  What is it?  Why now?  Who’s doing it?  What are the benefits?  What will the plan look like?  How is it done?
1 Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire Results May 2016.
Core Strategy Issues & Options consultation results.
Land west of Grace Crescent, Hardwick Presentation to Hardwick Parish Council 23/08/2016.
Welcome Adstock Parish Plan
Earswick Neighbourhood Plan Residents Survey No 2
HOUSING SUMMARY Some of the questions we asked were about the type and amount of housing we might need to plan for in our neighbourhood plan We found out.
Residents’ questionnaire survey June 2017
Feedback – key themes : Traffic
Place Standard How Good is Our Place?
Staverton Neighbourhood Development Plan
2.1.7 The rebranding process and players in rural places.
AGENDA The current focus on housing Do we need older people’s housing? The role of planning? National Level Local Level Opportunities to influence Planning.
Newton Playground Committee
1 2 What’s the problem? 3 4.
Draft Babergh Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan
Halton Court – Design Approach
Matthew Norton – Business Manager - Planning Policy
The Elderflowers Model
The Plan - Information Stage 1
Ewelme Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire September 2017
Neighbourhood Planning and Housing
Key ideas There are 2 main processes causing change in remote rural communities Depopulation of remote rural areas Counter-urbanisation.
Place Standard How Good is Our Place?
Who completed the survey?
Ludgershall Parish.
Winkleigh Neighbourhood Plan What is the Neighbourhood Plan?
Sandon Neighbourhood Development Plan and Questionnaire Results
Kislingbury Neighbourhood Plan 2013
Potton Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire
Climate Friendly Aberlady Community Survey
Key Issues emerging from the Community engagement events
Neighbourhood Plan Survey results
RESPONSE RATES 126 QUESTIONNAIRES RETURNED 75% 292 PEOPLE COVERED
The Neighbourhood Plan Area
Good afternoon: John Carley, Steve Leech Chacewater NDP team Chacewater Parish Council Chacewater Community Energy Group.
ELLINGHAM PARISH COUNCIL NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN
Transport Jacqui Cox OCC Simon Speller PBA
Presentation transcript:

Residents’ questionnaire survey November 2016 David Nicholson DJN Planning Ltd.

Residents’ survey Sept 2016 Questionnaires hand delivered & collected to 247 households across the parish 190 completed forms returned – 76.9% Headline results tonight – much more detail in the Results and Comment Listings reports 20 open and closed questions on housing, traffic, jobs and economy, community services and the environment

Housing – size and type Preference for 2 or 3 bed homes (76% and 84%) above larger houses or flats Most (84%) in favour of privately owned homes over other tenures Limited support for housing associations (30%) but more for shared ownership (48%) Self-build and live/work also supported (64% and 57%)

Guiding new housing Settlement boundaries or criteria approach? Majority in favour of the latter (52%) over using settlement boundaries (21%) to define the extent of the villages

Size of housing developments Most (84%) supported single new dwellings, within existing village areas Some supported smaller schemes (3-5 dwellings, 45%), others did not (36%) Limited support for a larger development of 10-15 houses: 11% for, 75% against

Where should houses be built? Number of specific locations suggested Continued support for idea of adding to existing “clusters” or infilling

Where should houses not be built? Support for protecting the countryside For infilling – but avoid cramming Some locations common to previous slide

Other comments on housing Clear view more affordable, starter and smaller homes needed for young people / families Not all agreed, or wanted only limited growth Eco design and public transport also key themes

Traffic, transport and access – areas for improvement Top priority: improvements to road, ditch and verge maintenance Other priorities: footway and bridleway maintenance, road and pedestrian safety Less emphasis here on interventions such as reducing traffic speed or traffic calming

Other comments on transport Many comments on traffic speed reduction Road maintenance – specific issues e.g. BOATs Public transport – better service & smaller buses

Jobs and economy Type of employment to be encouraged

Other comments on jobs Support for small-scale uses – businesses, diversification, tourism and camping Balanced against impacts on rurality Broadband and local services – shop/Post Office

Community services Meeting current and future needs Most important: broadband Other priorities: local woodlands, village hall, = mobile phone reception/bus services, Castle Inn. Least important: St Mary’s Church

Comments on need for services Most support for various forms of play facilities Improvements to village hall; provision of shop; and facilities for tourists e.g. car parking and interpretation Many saw no need – keep area as it is

The environment How to protect and enhance the environment? Most important: new development in keeping with its surroundings Close behind: protecting views = third: identifying land for local green space / special local features

Features to be protected? Most supported some or all of the e.g.’s in question Views identified to Hereford, Black Mountains and the Malverns (and need for hedge trimming)

Local renewable energy Most support for solar power (76%), with limited opposition and few ‘no opinions’ Also supported: ground heat pumps at 62% Fewer supported biomass (42%) or wind turbines (29%): over half were opposed to the latter (52%).

Comments on the environment Wide-ranging answers to this question Local features: hedge cutting, light pollution, resist urbanisation/maintain rurality, keep farmland Housing: design, tenure, energy, use of derelict buildings, need, scale and location

Information about you Against 2011 Census: Females slightly over-represented (53% of responses, 50% Census) All age groups under-represented, save for the 65-84 group (34% of responses, 25% Census)

Length of residence

Which parish do you live or have land in?

Key messages for the NDP Take a more flexible approach to defining the villages than using settlement boundaries Favour smaller sites for housing over larger Manage expectations re affordable, starter and smaller housing Consider Community Actions to capture aspirations for transport and community facilities Include support for specific types of employment and forms of provision such as conversions and home working Develop environment policies to reflect responses and comments made