Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages e5 (March 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg Proteins: Genomic Site Recruitment Generates Compacted Chromatin In Vitro and Impairs Activator Binding In Vivo  Takashi.
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Ci Chu, Kun Qu, Franklin L. Zhong, Steven E. Artandi, Howard Y. Chang 
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Discovery of Widespread GTP-Binding Motifs in Genomic DNA and RNA
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Ivar Ilves, Tatjana Petojevic, James J. Pesavento, Michael R. Botchan 
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Hiro-oki Iwakawa, Yukihide Tomari  Molecular Cell 
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Programmable RNA Cleavage and Recognition by a Natural CRISPR-Cas9 System from Neisseria meningitidis  Beth A. Rousseau, Zhonggang Hou, Max J. Gramelspacher,
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Sorting of Drosophila Small Silencing RNAs
Baekgyu Kim, Kyowon Jeong, V. Narry Kim  Molecular Cell 
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Polycomb Protein Ezh1 Promotes RNA Polymerase II Elongation
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Pcf11 Is a Termination Factor in Drosophila that Dismantles the Elongation Complex by Bridging the CTD of RNA Polymerase II to the Nascent Transcript 
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Hayun Lee, Yi Zhou, David W. Taylor, Dipali G. Sashital  Molecular Cell 
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Modeling of the RAG Reaction Mechanism
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Occupying Chromatin: Polycomb Mechanisms for Getting to Genomic Targets, Stopping Transcriptional Traffic, and Staying Put  Jeffrey A. Simon, Robert E.
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Ci Chu, Kun Qu, Franklin L. Zhong, Steven E. Artandi, Howard Y. Chang 
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)
Regulatory Interactions between RNA and Polycomb Repressive Complex 2
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Systematic Study of Nucleosome-Displacing Factors in Budding Yeast
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 1056-1067.e5 (March 2017) Targeting of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 to RNA by Short Repeats of Consecutive Guanines  Xueyin Wang, Karen J. Goodrich, Anne R. Gooding, Haroon Naeem, Stuart Archer, Richard D. Paucek, Daniel T. Youmans, Thomas R. Cech, Chen Davidovich  Molecular Cell  Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 1056-1067.e5 (March 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.003 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2017 65, 1056-1067.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.003) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 PRC2 Preferentially Binds to RNA-Containing G-Tracts In Vitro and In Vivo (A) Typical EMSA data for RNA 40-mers of homopolymeric sequence binding to PRC2 in 100 mM KCl. (B) Data fit with equilibrium-binding curves and error bars give SD (n = 3). In this and other figures, many of the error bars are within the size of the symbol and, therefore, not visible. (C) PRC2 binding to two oligonucleotides with the same base composition but a different grouping of Gs. (D) PRC2 binding to RNAs containing blocks of Gs (sequences in Table 1). (E) Enrichment of G-tracts, but not A-tracts, in RNA immunoprecipitated with EZH2, but not with SUZ12. Data of Hendrickson et al. (2016) were analyzed for the indicated motifs. The analysis cannot distinguish G from C or A from U. (F) Association between PRC2 binding (fRIP-seq data) and putative motifs as a function of G-tract length. (G) Association between PRC2 binding (fRIP-seq data) and putative motifs as a function of the number of G-tracts in proximity. Molecular Cell 2017 65, 1056-1067.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.003) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Validation of RNA Sequences that Fold into G4 Structures G4 structure formation assessed by CD (positive peak at 260–263 nm and negative peak at 237–241 nm). All spectra were determined at least twice in 100 mM KCl and in 100 mM LiCl at three temperatures, with representative data shown here. Unless stated otherwise, CD was at 30°C. (A) Poly (G) in 100 mM KCl and in 100 mM LiCl forms such a stable set of structures that it does not require K+ to fold. (B) Poly (G) in 100 mM KCl, structure does not melt even at 90°C. (C and D) Poly (U) provides a negative control for G4 structures and shows little evidence of any structure (C) in the presence or absence of K+ or (D) at different temperatures. (E and F) (GGAA)10 undergoes (E) K+-dependent folding into a G4 structure, (F) which is stable at 20°C and 30°C but melted at 90°C. (G) Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 30°C of radiolabelled 40-mers. Poly (G) formed a heterogeneous array of intramolecularly folded structures (vertical red line) in this experiment and in multiple repeat experiments with different RNA heating-cooling protocols. Left lane, size markers; next four lanes, homopolymers; red arrows, folded G4 RNA structures; blue arrow, hairpin structure. Molecular Cell 2017 65, 1056-1067.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.003) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 G-Quadruplex Stabilization Increases Its Affinity for PRC2 (A) Planar array of Hoogsteen-bonded guanines, or G-quartet, forms one layer of a G4 RNA structure. Potassium ion binds between layers and stabilizes the electronegative carbonyl oxygen atoms. (B) EMSA shows (GGAA)10 binding at lower PRC2 concentrations in 100 mM KCl than in 100 mM LiCl. (C) Two of the oligonucleotides that show substantial increases in binding in KCl relative to LiCl. Error bars show SD (n = 3) in this and subsequent panels. (D) The non-G4 oligonucleotide (GA)20 binds identically in KCl and LiCl. (E) Pre-formed G4-RNA-PRC2 complexes are disrupted by the cationic porphyrin TMPyP4, whereas non-G4-RNA complexes are unaffected. (F) In vivo fRIP-seq data show stronger association between EZH2 and larger numbers of repeats (n ≥ 4) of three consecutive guanines compared to shorter numbers of repeats (n ≤ 3). Because of the enormous number of such motifs across the genome, this specific association analysis was restricted to human chromosome 12. Molecular Cell 2017 65, 1056-1067.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.003) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Crosslinking Maps the PRC2 Subunits in Proximity to Bound RNA (A) Coomassie, SDS-PAGE of purified PRC2 (no tag), and four singly MBP-tagged PRC2 complexes (e.g., MBP-EZH2 indicates a purified PRC2 5-mer complex in which only the EZH2 subunit was N-terminally tagged with MBP). For the next three gels, the indicated 4S-U-substituted RNA was radiolabeled and photocrosslinked to the untagged and MBP-tagged PRC2 complexes. The order of the lanes is the same as for the Coomassie gel. Colored boxes are MBP-tagged subunits, which, in the case of MBP-EED, overlap with other untagged subunits. (B) Quantification of crosslinking efficiency between PRC2 subunits and various RNAs. There was no detectable crosslinking to RBBP4. Differences between left half (MBP-tagged EZH2) and right half (MBP-tagged SUZ12) could represent effect of the tag on RNA crosslinking or systematic error due to subtraction of background in gel. Error bars, SD; five to six independent experiments. (C) Left: pre-formed TERRA40-PRC2 complex is competed by unlabeled TERRA40 RNA and by its non-G4 mutant. Right: pre-formed TERRA40mut-PRC2 complex is competed by the same unlabeled RNA and by TERRA40. These experiments were not designed to measure Ki but rather to assess mutually exclusive versus independent binding. (D) Model for a single RNA-binding site at the conjunction of four PRC2 subunits, and a summary of its relative binding to various RNA structures/sequences. Molecular Cell 2017 65, 1056-1067.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.003) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 RNAs with Multiple G-Tracts Are Associated with PRC2-Binding Sites on Chromatin and with the H3K27me3 Mark (A) Enrichment of G-tracts, but not A-tracts, around EZH2-binding sites and chromatin mark H3K27me3, but not H3K36me3, in two cell lines (ENCODE data; Table S1). (B) Enrichment of DNA sequences coding for PRC2-binding RNA motifs at Polycomb target genes provides a means for RNA-mediated regulation in cis. Such models that have been previously proposed include (1) facilitation of derepression processes and maintenance of the active state of Polycomb target genes by eviction of PRC2 from transcribing genes that should not be subjected to H3K27me3 repression, where the RNA acts as a decoy to evict PRC2 from chromatin; and (2) maintenance of epigenetic silencing by RNA recruitment of PRC2 to target genes or scanning for other recruitment factors (reviewed in Brockdorff, 2013 and Davidovich and Cech, 2015). While all these models are still pending validation, they are not mutually exclusive, and any of them, if valid, will likely rely on local enrichment of such PRC2-binding RNA motifs. Molecular Cell 2017 65, 1056-1067.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.003) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions