User Pays Principles and Governance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-code User Pays. 2 What we will cover Background Current Services Governance Arrangements What is working well What is not working as well.
Advertisements

Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
Funding UKLink Process changes (User Pays). 2 Purpose of Presentation  Review of User Pays  Principles  Application to date  National Grid NTS observations.
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream, 4 th May 2006.
Xoserve Services Workgroup. xoserve Funding Arrangements - Model Comparison ModelKey Benefits User Pays Model AUser Pays Model B Baseline Services (Core)
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services Progress Report for Ofgem 5 th December 2006.
UNC Modification Proposal Daily Metered Elective Action 005: User Pays Proposal Simon Trivella – 4 th November 2008 Development Work Group 0224.
User pays presentation 6th November 1 user pays services November 2007.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Proposed Agreement For Identification And Administration Of Unregistered Sites Chris Warner Network Code Manager.
Delivering Connections and Capacity RIIO-T1 and associated commercial changes - Summary June 7th 2012.
UP presentation Transmission wstream Jan 08 1 user pays services implementation January 2008.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
Presented by : Steven J Edwards, Head of Income and Pricing, Wales & West Utilities GDN Allowed and collected revenue awareness presentation for Shippers.
Total xoserve income £(a)m (ASA services – includes element for transporter funded changet) Transporter funded change budget built into service charge.
Proposed DN Pensions Deficit Charge Transmission Workstream 2 November 2006.
Références, date, lieu Xoserve Service Model – Shipper’s View Total Gas and Power Ltd Gaz de France ESS.
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Agency Charging Statement Overview of Consultation 11 th February 2008.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th March 2009.
Project Nexus : Funding Arrangements Joel Martin - 30 April 2009.
Administrative Changes to the UK-Link Manual Modification 414 and SIS Removal David Addison.
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
UNC0376A - Increased Choice when applying for NTS Exit Capacity – User Pays initial thoughts Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 01.
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime 28 May 2009 Code User Pays Services.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
© 2011 The Williams Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Consolidated Nominations Jeramie Kilpack Mary White.
Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.
User Pays User Committee 12th November 2013
FGO: ASA Service Line Review
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
User Pays Funding – Potential Licence Mechanism
Transmission Workgroup 4th October 2012
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 4th October 2011.
Chris Warner Network Code Manager
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
Assignment Workshop 2 16th September 09, Solihull.
User Pays – Changed & New Services
PARCA Security and Termination Amounts
CSS Update for CoMC 19th September 2018
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Background MDD is currently managed within SPAA
DSC Default Process January 2019
Development Modification Proposal 0337: Introduction of a Inter-day Linepack Product – User Pays Options Review Group August th November.
xoserve core + user pays discussion
PN UNC Workgroup iGT Services
UNC Modification Proposal 0385 Inclusion of DNOs as Users in User Pays Arrangements Phil Lucas 7 June 2011.
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
User Pays Agency Charging Statement
UNC Transmission Workstream 7th December 2006
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
PROJECT NEXUS FUNDING – THE CUSTOMER’S VIEW
UNC Modification Proposal 0229
CAM: Next Steps UNC Transmission Workgroup Lisa Martin 9 January 2014.
Nexus Workstream 30 April 2009.
Review Group 221: Review of Questions from Session 2
Commercial Arrangements For Gas Quality Service – Introduction
Invoicing Proposals 20th May 2013
UNC MOD 213: USER PAYS GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS
IFRS 15 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Transmission Workstream 05 November 2009
Presentation transcript:

User Pays Principles and Governance 8th November 2006

Core Services Plus User Pays - Rationale from Second Consultation Document It gives GTs (through xoserve) an incentive to provide additional services and to respond to the needs of shippers as they would have the opportunity to earn additional revenue over and above their costs. It gives users an incentive to manage costs they impose on xoserve because they would pay for the additional services they request. It would enable the price control arrangements to respond more flexibly in the event of modifications to section u of the UNC. It would help to make sure that incremental UK-Link capacity is given to those who value it most.

User Pays – Model A Second GDPCR consultation document proposed that User Pays arrangements are Excluded Services provided by the transporters. On this basis, a possible model would be: The charge for each service is agreed in a charging methodology statement. The expected revenue/cost from Excluded Services is not included in the GTs’ allowed revenue. The GTs procure the services from xoserve, probably via the Agency Services Agreement. The GTs invoice users for the excluded services they take (likely to be undertaken by xoserve). Users pay the GTs for the service taken.

User Pays – Model A GTs User xoserve Contract? Pay for Service Invoice Provision Charges Service Request ASA xoserve

User Pays – Model B An alternative model is that users contract directly with the GTs’ agency (xoserve). On this basis, a possible model would be: The charge for each service is agreed in a charging methodology statement. The expected revenue/cost from the services is not included in the GTs’ allowed revenue. The GTs could require xoserve to provide a service via the Agency Services Agreement. xoserve invoices users for the services they take. Users pay xoserve for the service taken.

User Pays – Model B GTs User xoserve Invoice and Pay for Service Request and Provide Service ASA Contract? xoserve

Assumptions User pays arrangements will not apply before April 2008. No change to current GT licence obligations. On-going cost of non-user pays services will be funded by GTs’ allowed revenue.

Four Areas to Consider New enduring services. New one off services. Existing services Change to services

New Enduring Services Principle Issues for consideration: For new enduring services requested by Users, the additional cost is recovered as a charge to Users on a usage basis. Issues for consideration: When should a service be provided. What form should the service take. What unit charge should be made for the service.

New One Off Services Principle: Current arrangements should apply where a service is Limited in duration Is not intended to be available to all Users Insufficiently specified to set a charge in advance. These can be considered similar to ‘de minimis’ activities.

Existing Services The key stakeholder of a service line is the party who has the most interest in the way the service operates. The key stakeholder is not necessarily The recipient of the output from the service line or The owner of the obligation. Principle Criteria for applying user pays arrangements to an existing service: The key stakeholders are Users. Users have discretion on whether to use the service. The cost of the service line is usage dependent.

Existing Services Issues for consideration: How is the key stakeholder of a service identified. Who applies the user pays criteria. Who decides what charge should be made for the service.

Change to Services Principle Issues for Consideration The xoserve costs of change are recovered from the stakeholders in proportion to their interest in the way the change operates. For changes to a user pays service, the default assumption is that the cost is recovered from users of the service. Issues for Consideration What are the criteria for apportioning costs between stakeholders What form should the change take What charge should be made for the change How is the cost recovered from Users Additional charges made on a usage basis Adjustment to GT allowed revenue How are the GTs funded Allowance

Summary of Issues How is a new service initiated. How is the nature of a service or change agreed. How is the charge for a service or change determined. How is the key stakeholder and apportionment between stakeholders undertaken. How are the user pays criteria applied. How is the cost of change recovered from Users. How are the GTs funded for change