How to Evaluate a Web Page

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Web Resources DTRT session 4 Simon Mahony CCH.
Advertisements

Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Evaluating Web Resources. Author/Institution n Who is the author or Institution? n Biographical info given n Institution? n Information given about institution?
How to Create an MLA citation for a web document....
SOURCES finding & evaluating them. Evaluating the AUTHORITY of a source – what questions should we ask? Is the author or organization identified? What.
Evaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating Online Sources Freshman II. Why do we have to evaluate online sources?
RESEARCHING & EVALUATING Summer 2008 Melanie Wilson Academic Success Center MSC 207.
 Can be daunting with its volumes of resources  Takes skill & perseverance.  Should be done with prudence when: › selecting sites for your students.
World Wide Web Resources What Do the Experts Say About Web Pages? February, 2001.
Finding and Evaluating Sources.  Online Catalog: Search ALL the resources of the library; access through library computers or remotely through Internet.
Critically Evaluating Information Objective: Students will be able to critically evaluate a source of information.
Evaluating Websites… The truth is out there - but so is the lie..
How to Evaluate a Web Page. How to Evaluate A Web Page To evaluate a web page look for: –Purpose –Sponsor/Owner –Organization and Content –Bias--political.
Elements of Argumentation
Is this a good web site? How do I know?.  Students need to learn to evaluate the quality of information they find on the web as well as other information.
Evaluating Internet Sources
What is the purpose of the site or page
Website Evaluation Purpose
Evaluating Sources.
INTD 150 Library and Internet Research
Evaluating Information Sources
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Introduction to Research
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Evaluating Information Sources
FATMA ISMED K1-09 Websites in ELT.
Are my Sources Reliable?
Using Credible Internet Sources
Evaluating Web Resources
Evaluating Sources.
4 Criteria for Web Evaluation ELEMENTARY (BASIC)
SOURCES finding & evaluating them
Reliable vs. Unreliable Web Sources
Reliability of Sources
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Evaluating information on the www
Selecting appropriate sources
ABCs of Source Reliability
Searching the Internet
Evaluating Internet Sources
How To Do a Research Report
Evaluating Websites.
Beverly Jorgenson Library/Media Specialist John Marshall High School
Source evaluation criteria
Do you believe everything you read on the Internet?
ABCs of Website Evaluation
Evaluating Information Sources
Conducting Online Research
Safe and Effective Web searchING
Reliable and Un-Reliable Sources
Evaluating Information
How to Evaluate Text By Mr. M..
Evaluating Information Sources
ABC’s of Research.
Week 5 Websites and Creative Commons
Evaluating Information Sources
Evaluating Websites.
1. Get out your Do Now 2. Turn in your Dynasty Foldable
Introduction to Research
Evaluating Internet Resources
Choosing a website for research
Use the CRAAP Test to Evaluate Information
Scope and Approach Date of Publication Viewpoint Bias
Evaluating Internet Resources
Evaluate It- Lesson 1.
CRAAP.
Evaluating Website Credibility
Presentation transcript:

How to Evaluate a Web Page

How to Evaluate A Web Page To evaluate a web page look for: Purpose Sponsor/Owner Organization and Content Bias--political or issue stance (of the author or sponsor) Date of Production/Revision Usefulness Authority/author Audience Coverage Illustrations Security

Purpose Purpose: Why was the page created? To: - Inform - Entertain - Share information - Advertise/Sell a product or service (business/marketing) - Influence views, beliefs, elections (advocacy) - Provide up-to-the-moment news - Personal enjoyment

Sponsor/Owner Sponsor/Owner: On what type of Internet provider or organization does the page reside? (Provenance.) Government agency: federal, state, city, county (address frequently includes .gov) Educational: university, college, high school (address frequently includes .edu) Business/Company (address frequently includes .com) Association: Professional, Trade, Entertainment (address frequently includes .org) News bureau: television, newspaper, radio (address frequently includes .com) Personal (Individual)

Organization and Content Is the page organized and focused? Is it well designed? Is the text well written? Are the links relevant and appropriate? Are the links evaluated?

Bias--political or issue stance Bias--political or issue stance (of the author or sponsor): some web pages have an inherent bias that will impact everything that appears on them. Is the author or sponsor: left/liberal? right/conservative? center? a political action (PAC) group or association? a business

Date of Production/Revision When was the web page produced? When was it last revised? How up-to-date are the links? Are the links still viable?

Usefulness Usefulness: Is the web page relevant to the current research project? A well-researched, well-written, etc. page is not going to be helpful if it does not address the topic at hand. Ask, "is this useful to me?" If it is useful, does it: support an argument refute an argument give examples (survey results, primary research findings, case studies, incidents) provide "wrong" information that can be challenged or disagreed with productively Very important: does the page have an identifiable, respectable author and/or sponsor? If not, the page must be used with caution.

Authority/author Authority/author: Who is responsible for the page? Is the author an expert in this field? What else has he/she written or produced? Does the author provide an e-mail address? How accurate is the provided information?

Audience Audience: To what type of reader is the web page directed? Is the level appropriate for your needs? Is the page for: general readers, students (elementary, high school, college, graduate), specialists or professionals, researchers or scholars?

Coverage – Illustrations - Security Coverage: Does the page cover the topic comprehensively, partially or is it an overview? Illustrations: Are the graphics clear in intent, relevant and professional looking? Do the graphics add to or enhance the content? Security: Are security and/or encryption systems employed when necessary?