802.11e EDCA-APSD TXOP Handoff September 2003

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0xxx March 2014 Giwon Park, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on power save mode for real time traffic Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1329r0 PS-Poll for Downlink Bufferable Units Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom November 2012 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission January 2004 Mathilde Benveniste, Avaya Labs -- ResearchSlide 1 Clarifications on APSD Mathilde Benveniste Avaya.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0285r0 March 2013 Submission Resource Allocation Frame Format for RAW- based Medium Access Date: Authors: Chittabrata Ghosh,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /1165r0 Submission November 2005 Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.Slide 1 Joint Proposal MAC Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /465r0 Submission Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems July 2002 Slide 1 WiSP Wireless Sidelink Protocol Wim Diepstraten Gerrit Hiddink Agere.
Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Joint Proposal MAC Report
Relay Flow Control Date: Authors: May 2013 Month Year
Power Save Delivery for 11ay
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
DLS Power Save Delivery Mechanism
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
Proposal for Fast Inter-BBS Transitions
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
HCF medium access rules
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Non-Automatic Power Saving Delivery
Comment resolution on BSR CID 8426
Further Discussion on “Lost Ack” During Unscheduled Service Period
Further Discussion on “Lost Ack” During Unscheduled Service Period
CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Power Efficient PS Poll
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
Wireless Sidelink Protocol
Remedy to the ‘Missing Ack Problem’
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Data transmission detail in WUR mode
Scheduled Medium Access For Large Low Power BSS
Burst Transmission and Acknowledgment
Class-based Contention Periods (CCP) for the n MAC
Remedy to the Lost Ack Problem while Power Saving
QoS Poll Modifications Allowing Priority
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2005
HCF medium access rules
Power efficient and unified s solution
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
HT Features in Mesh Network
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
HCF medium access rules
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Comment resolution on CID 20175
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
HCF medium access rules
HCCA TXOP handling difficulties
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Interference Signalling Enhancements
Schedule Element Synchronization and Simplification
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Fixed Inter Frame Spacing for BRP in ay
Chapter 11 Comment Resolution for Letter Ballot 63
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Admissions Control and Scheduling Behaviours for Scheduled EDCA
Presentation transcript:

802.11e EDCA-APSD TXOP Handoff September 2003 doc.: IEEE 802.11-98/xxx September 2003 802.11e EDCA-APSD TXOP Handoff September 2003 Matthew Fischer, Broadcom Matthew Fischer, Broadcom

Efficiency of APSD in EDCA September 2003 Efficiency of APSD in EDCA Proposed EDCA APSD mechanism Allows QSTA-directed wake times Matches SP with QSTA application’s wake timing Without the overhead of complex scheduler in the QAP (maintains the simpler approach of EDCA) Provides for adequate power save operation within EDCA Still room for additional power savings Not too much different from simply sending a legacy PS-Poll frame Matthew Fischer, Broadcom

September 2003 Allow TXOP Handoff Allow the QSTA to hand the TXOP to the QAP when it is done with uplink transmissions Further reduces wake time Allows immediate downlink delivery, rather than delayed delivery QSTA does not have to stay awake during EDCA CSMA/CA protocol resolution time which is required in the current proposal for the QAP to access the network for downlink delivery New proposed behavior is optional, not required See TXOP limit addition Simple to implement Matthew Fischer, Broadcom

Mechanism for Handoff TXOP can be passed by allowing that: September 2003 Mechanism for Handoff TXOP can be passed by allowing that: QAP may respond to uplink QOS-Data (or QOS-Null) with MORE=0 with either QOS-Data+CF-ACK or QOS-Null+CF-ACK As an alternative to ACK Thereby taking over the TXOP Restrict QAP behavior to those cases where uplink flow is from a QSTA with a registered EDCA APSD Include option to allow QSTA to fill Duration of last frame of the TXOP with value to cover the expected mean-size data frame for the downlink flow plus SIFS+ACK I.e. NAV the handoff frames Alternative: cover a NULL frame plus SIFS+ACK Matthew Fischer, Broadcom

Example 1 QSTA captures network using EDCA rules September 2003 Example 1 SIFS QSTA Q-Data (More=1) Q-Data (More=0) ACK ACK QAP ACK Q-Data+CF-ACK Q-Data QAP takes control here QSTA captures network using EDCA rules QAP uses the more bit to determine handoff point Responds with normal ACK until handoff Matthew Fischer, Broadcom

Example 2 TXOP handoff only allowed if QSTA has signaled EDCA-APSD September 2003 Example 2 SIFS QSTA Q-Data (More=0) ACK ACK ACK QAP Q-Null+CF-ACK Q-Data Q-Data Control is passed, but QAP downlink traffic is not yet ready TXOP handoff only allowed if QSTA has signaled EDCA-APSD Matthew Fischer, Broadcom

TXOP limits Addition to the TXOP limit rules September 2003 TXOP limits Addition to the TXOP limit rules EDCA APSD TXOP limit = ½ of normal TXOP limit Both QSTA and QAP have this new limit for the EDCA-APSD case only “Shared TXOP” will never exceed normal TXOP limit Matthew Fischer, Broadcom

September 2003 Allowance for No-ACK Allow handoff with QoS-Data (I.e. without +CF-ACK) Only for cases when No ACK is expected for the frame with handoff signaling (I.e. MORE=0 and registered EDCA APSD flow) Matthew Fischer, Broadcom

Summary Allow QSTA-initiated TXOP to be handed off September 2003 Summary Allow QSTA-initiated TXOP to be handed off QSTA starts the TXOP with uplink frame QOS-NULL is allowed as initial frame QSTA and QAP “share” the TXOP Minimizes wake time for sleeping QSTA Optionally performed at the QAP, allowing flexibility in implementations May use proposed delayed downlink delivery instead Minimal change to EDCA APSD QSTA requirements Must be capable of receiving +CF-ACK Modified TXOP limit for EDCA-APSD case only Matthew Fischer, Broadcom