Mainring prograss 6 fold emit:2.3nm

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Advertisements

Beamstrahlung and energy acceptance K. Ohmi (KEK) HF2014, Beijing Oct 9-12, 2014 Thanks to Y. Zhang and D. Shatilov.
Resonance Crossing Experiment in PoP FFAG (preliminary report) M. Aiba (Tokyo Univ.) for KEK FFAG Group FFAG W.S. KEK.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Oliver Boine-FrankenheimSIS100-4: High current beam dynamics studies SIS 100 ‘high current’ design challenges o Beam loss in SIS 100 needs to be carefully.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
Linac e+ source for ILC, CLIC, SuperB, … Vitaly Yakimenko, Igor Pogorelsky November 17, 2008 BNL.
Target material and thickness considerations Alain Blondel, with thanks to Dean Adams and Dan Kaplan Priority for rebuild is to have a target mechanism.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Quantitative Optimisation Studies of the Muon Front-End for a Neutrino Factory S. J. Brooks, RAL, Chilton, Oxfordshire, U.K. Tracking Code Non-linearised.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
FMA workshop April 1st and 2nd, 2004 L. Nadolski1 Guiding Lines for Computing and Reading a Frequency Map New FMA Calculations for SOLEIL including Insertion.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Optimization Objectives Top Level Questions 10 MeV – Incorporate studies on operability, cost etc. 50 MeV – More stringent beam specs  Optimize 50 MeV.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Optimization of beam envelop at the injection point of PS Chenghui Yu Jan. 30, 2012.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster Tianjian Bian Jie Gao Michael Koratzinos (CERN) Chuang Zhang Xiaohao Cui Sha bai Dou Wang Yiwei.
ADSR Inst.July 2009 From PAMELA to ADSR, T.Yokoi From PAMELA to ADSR Takeichiro Yokoi (JAI)
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Beam test of slow extraction from the ESR
Design Study of CEPC Booster and Mainring Lattice
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
The Interaction Region
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
Non linear optimization of the CLIC pre-damping rings
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
Lattice design for CEPC PDR

NuSTORM - μ Storage Ring with Injection
12 GeV CEBAF.
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
CEPC Booster Design Progress (Low field)
Mainring prograss 6 fold emit:2.3nm
Mainring progress 6 fold emit:2.3nm
The new 7BA design of BAPS
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
CEPC Injector positron source
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
CEPC injector beam dynamics
CEPC Injector Linac beam dynamics
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Mainring prograss 6 fold emit:2.3nm
Mainring prograss 6 fold emit:2.3nm
Injection design of CEPC
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Electron Cooling Work Plan for New Strong Cooling Baseline
Presentation transcript:

Mainring prograss 6 fold emit:2.3nm Analytical results are agree with numeric results. 8 sextupole families and two tune shift variables, and we got the result showed in the plot. This is the best solution in that condition(8 sextupole families and two tune shift variables). 2rd chrom:270 3th chrom: 199. Pro.Cai say it is not bad, but expect more knobs to have better result. If we want better result, more sextupole families and more tune shift variables are expected.(but he formulae are so long that Mathematica in my labtop will breakdown, maybe the code need optimization)

X=72.8sigma Y=1237.2sigma@0%

X=48.6sigma Y=824.8sigma@0.5% X=24.3sigma Y=421.4sigma@1%

DA from my own code

Less than 6 min with 8 core@i7_6700Q

256 turns in 109 seconds

512 turns in 219 seconds

Phase space plot

Difficulties At begining, we want to use my own element simulator and link to Zlib to obtain the one-turn-map. Zlib is the most suitable to this situation, with high efficiency and convenient. The picture below shows the idea how to obtain one-turn-map using Zlib.(From Yan Yitong’s reprot)

Difficulties When we check the results from Zlib carefully, we find that Zlib always lose the first order in some Tps operation(such as ‘*’ and ‘/’). I read Yan’s papers and try to understand this result. Maybe it is because his tracking scheme. We know the core idea of Zlib, and I can also write a library like Zlib. But it is little far from accelerator physics. Now I am try to change his code. A little difficult, without handbook and comment. Solutions: change the simulator Use some symbol libraries. All of these will lose efficiency.

Requirement for Linac Parameter Symbol Unit Value E- beam energy Ee- GeV 6 E+ beam energy Ee+ Repetition rate frep Hz 50 E- bunch population Ne-   2×1010 E+ bunch population Ne+ Energy spread (E+/E-) σE <1×10-3 Emitance (E-) 0.3 mm mrad Emitance (E+)

Design Goal Consideration of injection Injected Beam p/2 Inject in X direction. Closed orbit kickers Injected Beam Circulating Beam p/2

Design Goal Consideration of injection Emit in mainring is 2E-9 m*rad, asuming beta_x=590 meter in the injection point. Asuming DA_x=20 sigma@dp=0.5% in the mainring. Asuming beta_x=590 meter in the injection point. The total space for injection: 8 sigma is retained for revolution beam to get enough quantum life time: 6 sigma is retained for injection beam to loss less particles: 3.2mm is lefted for septum and emit of booster@120Gev is 3.5E-9 m*rad.