Group work on challenges Learning oriented M&E System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOs and DONTs Joan-Anton Carbonell Kingston University EC External Expert TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
Advertisements

Margaret Geary Crime Reduction & Social Inclusion Director Government Office for the West Midlands.
Monitoring and evaluation of carers’ services and projects Dr Andrea Wigfield - Associate Professor of Social Policy Centre for International Research.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia Bangkok, Thailand 7-8 April 2009 Tracking national portfolios and assessing results.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Page 0 Agency Approaches to Managing for Development Results Why Results? What Results? Key Challenges, lessons learnt Core principles and draft action.
Erica Wimbush Head of Evaluation, NHS Health Scotland Swiss Jubilee Symposium on Public Health Evaluations – Lessons Learned and Future Directions 17 June.
What makes a successful development project? Kristin Olsen IOD PARC
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
2013 NEO Program Monitoring & Evaluation Framework.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 Structural Funds Evaluation A VIEW FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Anna Burylo, DG Regional Policy, Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
St. John’s, Antigua May What is STAP? In 1994, the GEF Instrument sets up STAP – “UNEP shall establish, in consultation with UNDP and the World.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Importance of Monitoring and Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Monitoring and Evaluation  How to Build an M&E System.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
CAN EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ALONE HELPS IMPROVE SERVICE DELIVERY? Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions Cherèl.
Session 1 S3.1 session day 5 4 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
MODULE 18 – PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Gender-Responsive NAP Processes
Spending Reviews in Ireland
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Project monitoring and evaluation
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Background of the Workshop Managing Information for Results
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
CRP DS M&E Framework Enrico Bonaiuti Research Program Coordinator
Session 1 – Study Objectives
High-resolution Climate Projections VN
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Evaluation of Nutrition-Sensitive Programs*
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Updating the Value Proposition:
FAME DIRECTOR’S OFFICE
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
WEBINAR on partner search 2nd call for proposals
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
ROOTS 1+2 Advocacy toolkit
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Integrating Climate Change into Development Programming – Tracking, Measuring & Learning for Adaptive Management Issues and an analytical framework for.
Nox Chitepo, Stanley Ntakumba, Gemma Paine
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Integrating Gender M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
FAME DIRECTOR’S OFFICE
Presentation transcript:

Group work on challenges Learning oriented M&E System CRP-DS Science and Implementation Workshop 30th June – 4th July, 2014 Holiday Inn Hotel - Amman, Jordan

From the cards How to develop learning oriented M&E system to enhance performances of the CRP Assessment of the change Lack of Quantification of success/ generic research Impact Learning how resilience is measured and assessed Quantitative and focused results are needed More info on benefits / beneficiaries of new technologies

1. What are the underlying issues in this cluster and your experience? Why do we need M&E? To achieve outputs, outcomes and impact through targeting. To reflect progress across CRP IDOs, outcomes, cross-cutting issues. The M&E should have clear objectives and a primary role in any intervention undertaken by the project. To achieve the overall goal (it is required by the CO) Measurement (Flagship specific indicators) Credibility Dissemination Reference/Baseline Frequency

1. What are the underlying issues in this cluster and your experience? Learning. Definition of L-O M&E. What it is its role and components? What is M&E? Are two distinct processes: a) monitoring and b) evaluation. Both can be done from the Donor side and from the project site. The evaluation can be internal and external. Adequate combination of qualitative and quantitative data Support to Gender analysis along the program Should reflect effi Efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, sustainability, and impact.

1. What are the underlying issues in this cluster and your experience? Priorities from the Group Limited knowledge on how learning process in embedded in the M&E We don’t know how to establish a friendly reporting structure We learn more from evaluation since the way our project is structured does not help to learn from monitoring.

2. What do we really want to achieve with a learning oriented M&E system in this CRP? Learning & Improvement Consolidate lessons learnt (best practices and failures) Adjust deviations timely (Identify constrains and how to adapt the program). Better (logical) planning to achieve impact

3. How to develop an effective and efficient learning oriented M&E system at regional level and programme level? Establish an M&E knowledge management time. It should be allocated for each FP. This implies budget allocation and more workload on current staff. The system should have its three component hardware, software and orgware. M&E should develop a qualitative monitoring to be independent It should be a simple system to be used It should be developed on the basis of bilateral projects reporting

3. How to develop an effective and efficient learning oriented M&E system at regional level and programme level? it needs to be compatible with other donor/CRP reporting; the CRPs/Centers need to push the consortium to do something about it since we cannot have different and constant reporting. It should capture quality info through informal communications (face to face, phone, skype…) Specific tailored trainings should be provided at different level of CRP DS doers/practitioners combined with training on result-oriented research (design, implementation and M&E)

4. What needs to change in the CRP to enable learning and adaptation in a rigorous manner? More structure personal contacts Change in mind set of CRP DS Willingness to share knowledge, information and data Shifting mindset from center focus to CRP Focal point coordinator should have control over the funds/budgets M&E teams across CRPs Should meet at Consortium Level