SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Revised June 2011.
Advertisements

Changes to Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith, Commissioner.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
TRANSITION SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 INDICATOR 13 BASIC REQUIREMENTS.
L everaging the IDEA for S uccessful T ransition P lanning Transition Planning Conference November 15, 2014 Law Offices of Mark B. Martin, P.A.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Continuous Improvement Monitoring System (CIMS) Indicator B13 Secondary Transition January 2015.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Apr-17 Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Requirements Training Referencing Kentucky Department of Education Indicator Webinar PowerPoint and.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Surrogate Parent Training
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report Indicator 13 Effective Transition Susan Beck, Ghaski Browning and Karen Ruddle Office of Special Programs.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Compliance & Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Referencing Kentucky Compliance Record Review School Year
Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Compliance & Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Referencing Kentucky Compliance Record Review School Year
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
What does Indicator #13 say? Virginia Department of Education  “Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable.
CIMP & DUE PROCESS POINTERS It’ that time again… Anoka-Hennepin participates in the Continuous Improvement Monitoring Process supported by.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
BIE Special Education Academy September 2011 Tampa Bay, Florida Presenter: Donald Griffin Education Specialist, Special Education Bureau of Indian Education.
ARC Chairperson Training Introduction 1. The Language of Special Education Acronyms 2.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
2010 B13 Data Collection March 24, 2010 Craig Wiles Public Sector Consultants Chuck Saur MI-TOP.
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
12/15/2015LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children Mid Year Update Leslie County Schools.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx March 22, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Compliance Referencing Kentucky Compliance Record Review School Year
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California Department of.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
CASE KDE UPDATE Division of Learning Services March 11, 2011.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Transition Plan Writing for the School Year.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
11/23/2016LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children School Year Information Leslie County Schools.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
Post-Secondary Transition
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Menlo Park City School District Special Education Self-Review (SESR)
TRANSITION AND THE IEP:
WDE Division of Individual Learning
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Indicator 13, Secondary Transition IEP Record Reviews
Special Education Student Record Review Protocol
Standards-based Individualized Education Program: Module Eight: Additional Components Specific to Secondary IEPs SBIEP Module Eight: Additional Components.
SPR&I Regional Training
Post-Secondary Transition
Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Compliance
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
The Transition Planning Process
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting Desk Audits/Onsite Visits Report for SPP Indicator 13 May 6, 2010

The Kentucky Department of Education (KDE), Division of Exceptional Children Services (DECS) has recently conducted twenty-nine (29) district desk audits, and eleven (11) district onsite visits

District Desk Audit/Onsite Visit Methodology

The focus areas for the reviews included priorities established by the Kentucky Department of Education Eligibility and least restrictive environment (LRE) for students identified for special education and related services in moderate incidence categories and multiple disabilities, regardless of the underlying disabilities Verification of district-generated data used in the Annual Performance Report (APR) for Indicators 11, 12 and 13 District compliance status for SPP Indicators 11, 12, 13 and 20

Districts were selected for either a desk audit or onsite visit based on several factors including the following: High percentage of district’s student population identified for special education services Potential compliance concerns in one or more areas District performance for students with disabilities on state assessments Parental concerns Diversity in geographic representation from across the state Diversity in district student population

Desk Audits/Onsite Visits The Data 328 student records 24 districts

Record Review Item #49 (a – i) SPP Indicator 13 Indicator at a glance % in Compliance Record Review Item #49 (a – i)

SPP Indicator 13 Indicator at a glance % Out of Compliance Record Review Item #49 (a – i)

49a The IEP includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals related to And when appropriate, independent living skills Training or education and Employment

49a n = 328 # out of compliance = 226 % out of compliance = 68.9 Language not measurable Goal as written did not contain required components

49b The IEP includes transition services that will reasonably enable the child to reach the postsecondary goals n = 328 # out of compliance = 18 % out of compliance = 5.5

49c For transition services likely to be provided or paid for by another agency, the other agency is invited to send a representative, if appropriate n = 328 # out of compliance = 29 % out of compliance = 8.8 Agency at meeting but not on Invitation Listed on IEP under “agency responsible” but not on Invitation

49d If an agency was invited to send a representative, signed Consent for Invitation is included n = 328 # out of compliance = 83* % out of compliance = 25.3 *forty-one (41) of eighty-three (83) files are from two (2) districts Still seeing some “blanket” Consent forms

49e As a transition service, the child has a multi-year course of study as outlined in the Individual Learning (Graduation) Plan n = 328 # out of compliance = 12 % out of compliance = 3.7 Occasionally still seeing MYCS only through student’s current year

49f Annual goal(s) included in the IEP are related to the transition service needs n = 328 # out of compliance = 43 % out of compliance = 13.1 Measurable Annual Goal the same as the Measurable Postsecondary Goal - with no other measurable annual goal linked to the postsecondary goal

49g Measurable postsecondary goals are based on age-appropriate transition assessment n = 328 # out of compliance = 13 % out of compliance = 3.9 Section blank on IEP; no discussion under transition service needs in the Present Levels

49h The child is invited to the ARC meeting where transition services are discussed n = 328 # out of compliance = 16 % out of compliance = 4.9 Student may have attended and even signed, but was not on Notice as invited

49i The measurable postsecondary goals are updated annually n = 328 # out of compliance = 20 % out of compliance = 6.1 IEP out of timeline

Desk Audits/Onsite Visits Corrective Action Plan Requirements Student-specific Systemic

Student-Specific Corrections Required corrective action for student-specific instances of noncompliance identified through the desk audit/onsite visit and described in the report

Student-Specific Corrections The district shall convene appropriately constituted Admission and Release Committees (ARC) to address the student-specific instances of noncompliance described in the report. The district shall submit documentation of the correction of all identified non-compliances to DECS as soon as possible, but documentation of all corrections must be received by DECS no later than November 15, 2010.

Systemic Corrections Required corrective action for systemic issues identified through the desk audit/ onsite visit and described in the report

Systemic Corrections 1. The district shall send the following individuals to training on the specific regulatory requirements for Indicator 13, and the development of Individual Education Programs (IEPs) that include the required transition content for each youth:   Director of Special Education (DoSE) At least one (1) ARC Chairperson from each high school and middle school in the district At least one (1) Special Education Department Chair, team leader or other special education staff person from each high school and middle school in the district This training will be conducted by KDE at a time and place to be determined by KDE.

Systemic Corrections 2. Subsequent to the training described above, the following district staff shall be required to attend a webinar on Indicator 13 provided by KDE:   All middle and high school special education teachers responsible for (or who may be responsible for) developing IEPs for students sixteen (16) and older (or younger if determined to be appropriate by the ARC) All high school and middle school ARC Chairpersons All related service personnel responsible for (or who may be responsible for) developing IEPs for students sixteen (16) and older (or younger if determined to be appropriate by the ARC)

Systemic Corrections 3. In addition to the quarterly reporting on the status of all other Corrective Action Plan (CAP) activities included in the report, the district shall submit with each quarterly report documentation of : All ARCs convened to discuss transition during that quarter

Systemic Corrections 3. (continued) Required documentation includes the following for each meeting:   Invitation to ARC meeting where transition was discussed Permission to invite outside agency (as appropriate) IGP/ILP/ Multi-year course of study Most current IEP and conference summary where secondary transition was discussed/updated Copy of previous year’s IEP

Using Career Cruising with Transition Students The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) mandates the provision of transition services to address the needs of youth with disabilities moving from school to post-school environments. The intent is to improve post-school outcomes for youth with disabilities.

Using Career Cruising with Transition Students In an effort to assist school districts in providing effective transition services, the National Alliance for Secondary Education and Transition (NASET) identified national standards and quality indicators that would encourage positive student outcomes.

Using Career Cruising with Transition Students Career Cruising has created a document showing how the program can be used to address IDEA’s recommended transition activities and NASET’s standards. The document may be found under the Other Helpful Documents heading in the Helpful Documents section of the School ILP Administration Tool.