Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Advertisements

A Disconnect between High-Affinity Binding and Efficient Regulation by Antifolates and Purines in the Tetrahydrofolate Riboswitch  Jeremiah J. Trausch,
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Matthieu Desroses, Mikael Altun  Cell Chemical Biology 
Crystal Structures of Sirt3 Complexes with 4′-Bromo-Resveratrol Reveal Binding Sites and Inhibition Mechanism  Giang Thi Tuyet Nguyen, Melanie Gertz,
Adding Specificity to Artificial Transcription Activators
Finding the Missing Code of RNA Recognition by PUF Proteins
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Ancestral Protein Reconstruction Yields Insights into Adaptive Evolution of Binding Specificity in Solute-Binding Proteins  Ben E. Clifton, Colin J. Jackson 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Interactions of Pleckstrin Homology Domains with Membranes: Adding Back the Bilayer via High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics  Eiji Yamamoto, Antreas C.
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Darren Thompson, Mark B Pepys, Steve P Wood  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2019)
Ins and Outs of Kinase DFG Motifs
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
A General Strategy for Creating “Inactive-Conformation” Abl Inhibitors
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Making a New Turn In Matrix Metalloprotease Inhibition
Sanjay B. Hari, Ethan A. Merritt, Dustin J. Maly  Chemistry & Biology 
Sachin Surade, Tom L. Blundell  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Conformation-Selective ATP-Competitive Inhibitors Control Regulatory Interactions and Noncatalytic Functions of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases  Sanjay B.
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Inhibitor Specificity via Protein Dynamics
E.Radzio Andzelm, J Lew, S Taylor  Structure 
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Ethan B. Butler, Yong Xiong, Jimin Wang, Scott A. Strobel 
Structural Basis of Swinholide A Binding to Actin
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Inflammatory Twins from PI3K Gang Brought to Justice?
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
A Mimivirus Enzyme that Participates in Viral Entry
The Structure of JNK3 in Complex with Small Molecule Inhibitors
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structure of the EntB Multidomain Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase and Functional Analysis of Its Interaction with the EntE Adenylation Domain  Eric J.
Mark S. Dunstan, Debraj GuhaThakurta, David. E. Draper, Graeme L. Conn 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
A General Strategy for Creating “Inactive-Conformation” Abl Inhibitors
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 201-211 (February 2006) Differential Binding of Inhibitors to Active and Inactive CDK2 Provides Insights for Drug Design  George Kontopidis, Campbell McInnes, Sravan R. Pandalaneni, Iain McNae, Darren Gibson, Mokdad Mezna, Mark Thomas, Gavin Wood, Shudong Wang, Malcolm D. Walkinshaw, Peter M. Fischer  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 201-211 (February 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.11.011 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Correlation of Calculated Interaction Energies with Experimental Inhibition Constants (A–D) Graphs for pyrimidine analogs 1–6 alone ([A], monomeric; [B], active), and including a set of diverse CDK2 inhibitors from the PDB ([C], monomeric; [D], active) in inactive monomeric and active cyclin bound structures. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 201-211DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Richardson Diagram of the Overlay of Active and Inactive apo-CDK2 (A) Active apo-CDK2 is shown in yellow; inactive apo-CDK2 is shown in blue. The differences in the orientation of the N and C domains and in the large movement of the T-loop upon cyclin binding can be observed upon overlay of the active and inactive structures from residues 170–285. (B) Electron density difference maps (2Fo − 1Fc) in the ATP binding site of the CDK2/cyclin A/4 complex. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 201-211DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Crystal Structures of Ligands 1 and 4 Bound in Active and Inactive CDK2 (A–C) The overlay shown is residues 77–143 of the same inhibitor (yellow, active; blue, inactive) and with the substituted aniline derivative 4 (yellow) bound in (B) monomeric CDK2 (green) and (C) active (pink) CDK2. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 201-211DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison of the Active and Monomeric CDK2 Binding Modes of Pyrimidine Inhibitors 3, 5, and 6 (A) Inhibitor 3 bound in the ATP binding site of active (yellow) and inactive (blue) CDK2 showing the large shift of Y15 in the active CDK2 structure. (B) The structures of ligand 5 bound in active (yellow) and inactive (blue) CDK2, overlaid from residues 77–143. (C) The phenyltriazole group of ligand 6 occupies a different conformation depending on which activation state of CDK2 it is bound to and makes substantially different interactions with the binding site in each context. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 201-211DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions