Carrying Out Significance Tests

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson Tests about a Population Parameter.
Advertisements

AP Statistics Section 11.2 B. A 95% confidence interval captures the true value of in 95% of all samples. If we are 95% confident that the true lies in.
Lesson Tests about a Population Mean. Knowledge Objectives Define the one-sample t statistic.
Business Statistics for Managerial Decision
Lesson Carrying Out Significance Tests. Vocabulary Hypothesis – a statement or claim regarding a characteristic of one or more populations Hypothesis.
Lesson Comparing Two Means.
Lesson 11 - R Review of Testing a Claim. Objectives Explain the logic of significance testing. List and explain the differences between a null hypothesis.
LESSON Tests about a Population Parameter.
AP Statistics Section 11.2 A Inference Toolbox for Significance Tests
Two-Sided Hypothesis Tests. p ,29 p ,32,33 p
Lesson Testing Claims about a Population Mean Assuming the Population Standard Deviation is Known.
Lesson Comparing Two Proportions. Knowledge Objectives Identify the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution of p-hat 1 – p-hat.
Lesson Significance Tests: The Basics. Vocabulary Hypothesis – a statement or claim regarding a characteristic of one or more populations Hypothesis.
Lesson Comparing Two Proportions. Inference Toolbox Review Step 1: Hypothesis –Identify population of interest and parameter –State H 0 and H a.
Lesson Comparing Two Means. Knowledge Objectives Describe the three conditions necessary for doing inference involving two population means. Clarify.
Hypothesis Testing Errors. Hypothesis Testing Suppose we believe the average systolic blood pressure of healthy adults is normally distributed with mean.
Statistical Significance. p ,14,15 p ,22,24,26.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter Hypothesis Tests Regarding a Parameter 10.
Chapter Nine Hypothesis Testing.
Tutorial 11: Hypothesis Testing
Review of Power of a Test
Tests About a Population Proportion
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition
Chapter 9: Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
Review of Testing a Claim
Inference about Two Means - Independent Samples
Review of Chapter 12 Significance Tests in Practice
Hypothesis Tests Regarding a Parameter
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Chapter 9: Testing a Claim
Hypothesis Testing for Proportions
Significance Tests: A Four-Step Process
Hypothesis Testing: Hypotheses
Review of Chapter 10 Confidence Intervals
AP Stats Check In Where we’ve been…
Hypothesis Tests for a Population Mean in Practice
Section 11.2: Carrying Out Significance Tests
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
Lesson Comparing Two Means.
YOU HAVE REACHED THE FINAL OBJECTIVE OF THE COURSE
Lesson Use and Abuse of Tests.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Click the mouse button or press the Space Bar to display the answers.
AP STATISTICS LESSON 10 – 2 (DAY 3)
Lecture 10/24/ Tests of Significance
Chapter 9 Testing a Claim
STA 291 Spring 2008 Lecture 18 Dustin Lueker.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Review of Chapter 10 Comparing Two Population Parameters
Intro to Confidence Intervals Introduction to Inference
Chapter 9: Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Click the mouse button or press the Space Bar to display the answers.
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 9: Testing a Claim
Chapter 9: Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Section 11.1: Significance Tests: Basics
Chapter 9: Testing a Claim
Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing
Chapter 9: Testing a Claim
How Confident Are You?.
Testing Claims about a Population Standard Deviation
Presentation transcript:

Carrying Out Significance Tests Lesson 11 - 2 Carrying Out Significance Tests

Knowledge Objectives Identify and explain the four steps involved in formal hypothesis testing.

Construction Objectives Using the Inference Toolbox, conduct a z test for a population mean. Explain the relationship between a level α two-sided significance test for µ and a level 1 – α confidence interval for µ . Conduct a two-sided significance test for µ using a confidence interval.

Vocabulary Hypothesis – a statement or claim regarding a characteristic of one or more populations Hypothesis Testing – procedure, base on sample evidence and probability, used to test hypotheses Null Hypothesis – H0, is a statement to be tested; assumed to be true until evidence indicates otherwise Alternative Hypothesis – H1, is a claim to be tested.(what we will test to see if evidence supports the possibility) Level of Significance – probability of making a Type I error, α

Inference Toolbox To test a claim about an unknown population parameter Step 1: Hypotheses Identify population of interest and parameter State null and alternative hypotheses Step 2: Conditions Check 3 conditions (SRS, Normality, Independence); if met, then continue (or proceed under caution if not) Step 3: Calculations State test or test statistic Use calculator to calculate test statistic and p-value Step 4: Interpretation Conclusion, connection and context about P-value and the hypotheses

Z Test for a Population Mean Note: not usually seen in AP world (t-test more common)

Hypothesis Testing Approaches Classical Logic: If the sample mean is too many standard deviations from the mean stated in the null hypothesis, then we reject the null hypothesis (accept the alternative) P-Value Logic: Assuming H0 is true, if the probability of getting a sample mean as extreme or more extreme than the one obtained is small, then we reject the null hypothesis (accept the alternative). Confidence Intervals Logic: If the sample mean lies in the confidence interval about the status quo, then we fail to reject the null hypothesis

Reject null hypothesis, if Classical Approach -zα -zα/2 zα/2 zα Critical Regions x – μ0 Test Statistic: z0 = ------------- σ/√n Reject null hypothesis, if Left-Tailed Two-Tailed Right-Tailed z0 < - zα z0 < - zα/2 or z0 > z α/2 z0 > zα

Reject null hypothesis, if P-Value Approach z0 -|z0| |z0| z0 P-Value is the area highlighted x – μ0 Test Statistic: z0 = ------------- σ/√n Reject null hypothesis, if P-Value < α

Confidence Interval Approach x – zα/2 · σ/√n x + zα/2 · σ/√n Lower Bound Upper Bound μ0 Reject null hypothesis, if μ0 is not in the confidence interval

Example 1 Assume that cell phone bills are normally distributed. A simple random sample of 12 cell phone bills finds x-bar = $65.014. The mean in 2004 was $50.64. Assume σ = $18.49. Test if the average bill is different today at the α = 0.05 level. Use each approach. Step 1: Hypothesis H0:  = $50.64 (mean cell phone bill is unchanged) Ha:  ≠ $50.64 (mean cell phone bill has changed) Step 2: Conditions SRS: stated in problem Normality: population is normally distributed Independence: far more than 120 cell phones

Example 1: Classical Approach A simple random sample of 12 cell phone bills finds x-bar = $65.014. The mean in 2004 was $50.64. Assume σ = $18.49. Test if the average bill is different today at the α = 0.05 level. Use the classical approach. not equal  two-tailed X-bar – μ 65.014 – 50.64 14.374 Z0 = --------------- = ---------------------- = ------------- = 2.69 σ / √n 18.49/√12 5.3376 Using alpha, α = 0.05 the shaded region are the rejection regions. The sample mean would be too many standard deviations away from the population mean. Since z0 lies in the rejection region, we would reject H0. Zc = 1.96 Zc (α/2 = 0.025) = 1.96

Example 1: P-Value A simple random sample of 12 cell phone bills finds x-bar = $65.014. The mean in 2004 was $50.64. Assume σ = $18.49. Test if the average bill is different today at the α = 0.05 level. Use the P-value approach. not equal  two-tailed X-bar – μ 65.014 – 50.64 14.374 Z0 = --------------- = ---------------------- = ------------- = 2.69 σ / √n 18.49/√12 5.3376 The shaded region is the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is greater than $65.014; which is equal to 2(0.0036) = 0.0072. Using alpha, α = 0.05, we would reject H0 because the p-value is less than α. -Z0 = -2.69 P( z < Z0 = -2.69) = 0.0036 (double this to get p-value because its two-sided!)

Using Your Calculator: Z-Test For classical or p-value approaches Press STAT Tab over to TESTS Select Z-Test and ENTER Highlight Stats Entry μ0, σ, x-bar, and n from summary stats Highlight test type (two-sided, left, or right) Highlight Calculate and ENTER Read z-critical and/or p-value off screen From previous problem: z0 = 2.693 and p-value = 0.0071

Example 1: Confidence Interval A simple random sample of 12 cell phone bills finds x-bar = $65.014. The mean in 2004 was $50.64. Assume σ = $18.49. Test if the average bill is different today at the α = 0.05 level. Use confidence intervals. Confidence Interval = Point Estimate ± Margin of Error = x-bar ± Zα/2 σ / √n = 65.014 ± 1.96 (18.49) / √12 = 65.014 ± 10.4617 Zc (α/2) = 1.96 50.64 x-bar 54.55 75.48 The shaded region is the region outside the 1- α, or 95% confidence interval. Since the old population mean lies outside the confidence interval, then we would reject H0.

Using Your Calculator: Z-Interval Press STAT Tab over to TESTS Select Z-Interval and ENTER Highlight Stats Entry σ, x-bar, and n from summary stats Entry your confidence level (1- α) Highlight Calculate and ENTER Read confidence interval off of screen If μ0 is in the interval, then FTR If μ0 is outside the interval, then REJ From previous problem: u0 = 50.64 and interval (54.552, 75.476) Therefore Reject

Example 2 National Center for Health has that the mean systolic blood pressure for males 35 to 44 years of age is 128. The medical director for a company examines the medical records of 72 male executives in the age group and finds that their mean blood pressure is 129.93. Is there evidence to support that their blood pressure is different? Step 1: Hypothesis H0:  = 128 (younger male executives’ mean blood pressure is 128) Ha:  ≠ 128 (their blood pressure is different than 128) Step 2: Conditions SRS: possible issue, but selected from free annual exams Normality: sample size large enough for CLT to apply Independence: have to assume more than 720 young male executives in the company (large company!!)

Example 2: P-Value Step 3: Calculations: Step 4: Interpretation: X-bar – μ 129.93 – 128 1.93 Z0 = --------------- = ---------------------- = ------------- = 1.092 σ / √n 15/√72 1.7678 From calculator: z = 1.0918 p-value = 0.2749 More than 27% of the time with a sample size of 72 from the general population of males in the 35-44 age group, we would get blood pressure values this extreme or more  Fail to reject H0; not enough evidence to say that this companies executives differ from the general population.

Example 3 Medical director for a large company institutes a health promotion campaign to encourage employees to exercise more and eat a healthier diet. One measure of the effectiveness of such a program is a drop in blood pressure. The director chooses a random sample of 50 employees and compares their blood pressures from physical exams given before the campaign and again a year later. The mean change in systolic blood pressure for these n=50 employees is -6. We take the population standard deviation to be σ=20. The director decides to use an α=0.05 significance level.

Example 3 cont Hypothesis: H0: Ha: Conditions: 1: 2: 3: μ = 0 blood pressure is same μ < 0 Regime lowers blood pressure SRS -- stated in the problem statement Normality -- unknown underlying distribution, but large sample size of 50 says x-bar will be Normally distributed (CLT) Independence -- since sampling is w/o replacement; assume company has over 500 employees

Example 3 cont Calculations: Interpretation: x – μ0 -6 – 0 Z0 = ----------- = ------------------ σ/√n 20/√50 = -2.12 P-value = P(z < Z0) = P(z < -2.12) = 0.0170 (unusual !) P-value = 0.0170  so only 1.7% of the time could we get a more extreme value. Since this is less than α = 0.05, we reject H0 and conclude that the mean difference in blood pressure is negative (so the regime may have worked!)

Example 4 The Deely lab analyzes specimens of a drug to determine the concentration of the active ingredient. The results are not precise and repeated measurements follow a Normal distribution quite closely. The analysis procedure has no bias, so the mean of the population of all measurements is the true concentration of the specimen. The standard deviation of this distribution was found to be σ=0.0068 grams per liter. A client sends a specimen for which the concentration of active ingredients is supposed to be 0.86%. Deely’s three analyses give concentrations of 0.8403, 0.8363, and 0.8447. Is their significant evidence at the 1% level that the concentration is not 0.86%? Use a confidence interval approach as well as z-test.

Example 4 cont Hypothesis: H0: Ha: Conditions: 1: 2: 3: μ = 0.86 grams per liter μ  0.86 grams per liter SRS -- assume that each analyses represents an observation in a simple random sample Normality -- stated in the problem that distribution is Normal Independence -- assume each test is independent for the others

Example 4 cont Calculations: Interpretation: x – μ0 0.8404 – 0.86 Z0 = ----------- = ------------------ σ/√n 0.0068/√3 = -4.99 P-value = 2P(z < Z0) = 2P(z < -4.99) = 0.0004 (unusual !) x-bar  z* σ / √n 0.8404  2.576 (0.0068) / √3 0.8404  0.0101 (0.8303, 0.8505) P-value = 0.0004  so only .04% of the time could we get a more extreme value. Since this is less than α = 0.01, we reject H0 and conclude that the mean concentration of active ingredients is not 0.86

Summary and Homework Summary Homework A hypothesis test of means compares whether the true mean is either Equal to, or not equal to, μ0 Equal to, or less than, μ0 Equal to, or more than, μ0 There are three equivalent methods of performing the hypothesis test The classical approach The P-value approach The confidence interval approach Homework pg 713 ; 11.35 - 40 X-bar – μ Z0 = --------------- σ / √n