The Measurement of sin2β(eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays with BABAR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Sep 11, 2006SLUO Anual Meeting Search for Super-Penguins: CP Violation in B 0 ->K+K-K 0 D. Dujmic, SLAC For BABAR Collaboration D. Dujmic, SLAC For.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
Sin2  1 /sin2  via penguin processes Beauty 2006 Sep.25-29, Univ. of Oxford Yutaka Ushiroda (KEK)
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
SLAC DOE Review, Jun CP Violation in Penguin Decays Denis Dujmic, SLAC.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
Page 1 B 0   Ks + quasi 2 body modes Koji Hara (Nagoya University) CKM2006 WG4    from charmless B decays.
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Guglielmo De Nardo Napoli University and INFN 7th Meeting on B Physics, Orsay, France, October 4th 2010.
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
August 20, 2007 Charmless Hadronic B decays at BaBar1 Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar Woochun Park University of South Carolina Representing the BaBar.
Max Baak1 Impact of Tag-side Interference on Measurement of sin(2  +  ) with Fully Reconstructed B 0  D (*)  Decays Max Baak NIKHEF, Amsterdam For.
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
1 ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2  in Loop-Dominated Decays with B A B AR The Measurement of sin2β (eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
Summary of  2 measurements at Super KEKB Hirokazu Ishino Tokyo Institute of Technology 19 Dec., 2006.
11 th July 2003Daniel Bowerman1 2-Body Charmless B-Decays at B A B AR and BELLE Physics at LHC Prague Daniel Bowerman Imperial College 11 th July 2003.
CP-Violating Asymmetries in Charmless B Decays: Towards a measurement of  James D. Olsen Princeton University International Conference on High Energy.
B  K   p  and photon spectrum at Belle Heyoung Yang Seoul National University for Belle Collaboration ICHEP2004.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria 20 July, 2013 Representing the BaBar.
Guglielmo De Nardo for the BABAR collaboration Napoli University and INFN ICHEP 2010, Paris, 23 July 2010.
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
Improved measurements of B → hh decays at Belle
Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar
D0 mixing and charm CP violation
Present status of Charm Measurements
Hadronic B Decays at BELLE and BABAR
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Measurements of a and future projections
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
Search for Super-Penguins: CP Violation in B0->K+K-K0
Measurements of the UT Angle a from BABAR
Representing the BaBar Collaboration
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar
new measurements of sin(2β) & cos(2β) at BaBar
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
“sin2f1” measurement with bs penguin decays at Belle
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Charmless Quasi-two-Body Modes at BaBar
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
Gabriella Sciolla (MIT)
Constraints on α from B Decays at BaBar
f3 measurements by Belle
Search for Direct CP Violation in 3-body Cabibbo-suppressed D0 Decays
Sin(2β) measurement with b→c transitions in BaBar
Branching Fractions and CP Violation in BdKK at BaBar
Presentation transcript:

The Measurement of sin2β(eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays with BABAR Andreas Höcker Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire, Orsay For the BABAR Collaboration ICHEP 2004 August 16 - 22, 2004, Beijing, China hoecker@lal.in2p3.fr Preliminary analyses documented in BABAR-CONF-04/33, 04/25, 04/40, 04/19, 04/30 ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR The Quest for New Physics in B Decays Since the successful and precise measurement of sin2β in decays (in perfect agreement with the SM), considerable effort at B Factories towards the search for specific signs of New Physics (NP)…. WHY ? The gauge hierarchy Problem (Higgs sector, scale ~ 1 TeV) Baryogenesis (CKM CPV too small) The strong CP Problem (why is  ~ 0 ?) Grand Unification of the gauge couplings ... many more see, e.g., the instructive talk by Y. Grossman at LP’03: hep-ph/0310229 Conflict between limits from flavor physics  1 TeV (e.g., K0, D0, B0 mixing), and NP scale (1 TeV)  NP cannot have a generic flavor structure Requires flavor suppression and/or generic suppression and/or alignment Note that: if NP contributes significantly to CPV in loop decays, we naturally expect it to be different among the modes  averaging only useful in case of SM ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Confronting Loop Decays with Tree Dominance decays are tree and penguin diagrams, with equal dominant weak phases decays are pure “internal” and “flavor-singlet” penguin diagrams High virtual mass scales involved: believed to be sensitive to New Physics Both decays dominated by single weak phase Tree: Penguin: New Physics? 3 ? ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Penguin Olympia Naive (dimensional) uncertainties on sin2 One may identify golden, silver and bronze-plated s-penguin modes: Gold Color-suppressed tree Silver Color-suppressed tree Bronze Note that within QCD Factorization these uncertainties turn out to be much smaller ! ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR All Results are PRELIMINARY ! Definition of Time-dependent CP asymmetry observables: CP observables with: ~ –CPsin(2 ) and ~ 0 for b  ccs, sss ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Highlights on Common Analysis Techniques Strong DIRC Particle ID to separate pions from kaons Event shape monomials (L0,L2), and B kinematics optimally combined in Multivariate Analyzer [MVA] (Neural Network (NN) or Fisher Discriminant) New NN-based B-flavor tagging with “Q” up to 30.6 % Unbinned maximum-likelihood fit using beam-energy-substituted B mass (mES), B-energy difference (E), the resonance mass and decay angle, the MVA, and t Likelihood components are signal (correctly and misreconstructed), continuum background, charmed and charmless B-related backgrounds; as many likelihood-model parameters as possible are determined simultaneously from the fit to reduce systematic errors Tagging-performance parameters and t resolution parameters determined simultaneously from fit to fully reconstructed B decays to charm ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Analysis of B 0   K 0 227106 B pairs full background continuum bkg ML fit finds 114 ± 12 signal events 98 ± 18 signal events Systematic errors dominated by opposite-CP background PDF modeling Tag-side CP violation combined fit : sin2 [cc] @ 0.9 ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Analysis of B 0/+   K 0/+ 227106 B pairs B0KS (statistical errors only) Complementary penguin mode: Significant direct CP violation would be hint for New Physics B0KL Fit finds 400 ± 23 signal events ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Analysis of B 0  K+K–K S (I) 227 106 B pairs Excluding  : dominant contribution (85%) of inclusive BR  much more statistics than KS Unknown a priori CP content: CP-even fraction must be determined experimentally Angular moments analysis (main result): Study  [K+K–] helicity angle distribution and: Average moments computed from sum of background-corrected signal weights, returned by ML fit (“sPlot” technique [Pivk-Le Diberder, physics/0402083]) Isospin analysis (cross check) [Belle, PRD 69, 012001 (2004)] (statistical error only) ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Analysis of B 0  K+K–K S (II) Results from CP fit Fit finds 452 ± 28 signal events (excluding  KS events) Systematic errors dominated by Fit bias Tag-side CP Violation ML fit: use C=0: sin2 [cc] @ 0.7 CP content ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Analysis of B 0  ’ K S 227106 B pairs Large statistics mode: , we exploit: Reconstruct in multiple final states: ’   + –,  0  and     ,  + – 0 and KS  + – , 0 0 3.0 Fit finds 819 ± 38 events No CPV found in control sample ML fit : sin2 [cc] @ 3.0 Systematic errors dominated by: Fit bias (MC statistics) ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Analysis of B 0  f0 K S 209 106 B pairs New, silver-plated s-penguin mode with [BABAR, hep-ex/0406040] Requires thorough estimate of CP dilution due to interference in B0   + – KS Dalitz plot Fit finds 152 ± 19 events CPV @ 2.3 ML fit : Systematic errors dominated by Fit bias & interference with other modes sin2 [cc] @ 0.6 ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Analysis of B 0   0 K S (I) 227 106 B pairs Challenging vertexing (t ) due to lifetime of KS : require at least 4 SVT hits (~60% of events) for t measurement determine t from global fit to entire decay tree (use Ebeam, IP (+2B)-constraint) keep remaining “no-t ”events for direct CPV measurement mass-constrained Replace E and mES by: and  reduced correlation, improved resolution (mmiss) Fit finds 300 ± 23 events ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Analysis of B 0   0 K S (II) ~ SM sPlot 1 2 3 physical limit Systematic errors dominated by Background tagging asymmetry SVT alignment, vertexing ML fit : sin2 [cc] @ 1.3 No bias in control sample decays without using J / -decay tracks for vertexing ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR sin2 (and related direct-CP ) Results from BABAR s-penguin average at 2.7 from sin2[cc] (BABAR only) no indication for direct CP violation ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR

A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR Conclusion BABAR has new sin2(eff) results for all s-penguin analyses, most using 227 106 B pairs Introduced and observed new silver-plated s-penguin mode Sophisticated vertexing allows time-dependent measurement of CPV in The significant decrease in the statistical errors begins to provide precision measurements of CP violation in loop processes The “Stamodometer” indicates for the different modes: ... and overall: s-penguins ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2 in Loop-Dominated Decays with BABAR