Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Crystal Structure of a Complex between the Aminoglycoside Tobramycin and an Oligonucleotide Containing the Ribosomal Decoding A Site  Quentin Vicens,
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan, Ellen Nalivaika, Celia A. Schiffer  Structure 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
The 1.85 Å Structure of Vaccinia Protein VP39: A Bifunctional Enzyme That Participates in the Modification of Both mRNA Ends  Alec E Hodel, Paul D Gershon,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Alfred Lammens, Alexandra Schele, Karl-Peter Hopfner  Current Biology 
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Structure of the Yeast Hst2 Protein Deacetylase in Ternary Complex with 2′-O-Acetyl ADP Ribose and Histone Peptide  Kehao Zhao, Xiaomei Chai, Ronen Marmorstein 
Quentin Vicens, Eric Westhof  Structure 
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Engineered Domain Swapping as an On/Off Switch for Protein Function
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 110, Issue 6, Pages (September 2002)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Carl C. Correll, Betty Freeborn, Peter B. Moore, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Restriction Enzyme BsoBI–DNA Complex
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 1017-1027 (November 2001) Single-Site Mutations Induce 3D Domain Swapping in the B1 Domain of Protein L from Peptostreptococcus magnus  Jason W. O'Neill, David E. Kim, Keyji Johnsen, David Baker, Kam Y.J. Zhang  Structure  Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 1017-1027 (November 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00667-0

Figure 1 The Asymmetric Unit of V49A (a) The asymmetric unit contains two monomers (cyan/brown) and a domain-swapped dimer (orange and magenta). The molecules are labeled Mol A, B, C, and D, respectively. The β strands and α helix are labeled on molecule A. Arrows point to the A49 in each molecule. The hinge region consists of the residues in the second β turn (residues 53–56). (b) The repacking of side chains near the V49A residues for the monomer (cyan), dimer (orange/magenta), and WT (green). For the V49A monomer the side-chain of Y34 has the largest shift, similar to the V49A domain-swapped dimer. In the V49A domain-swapped dimer the side chain of Y56 shifts due to the β strand extension and causes further shifts in F26 and a 180° rotation about χ1 for L58 Structure 2001 9, 1017-1027DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00667-0)

Figure 2 Stereo Views of Electron Density from Composite Omit Maps of V49A and G55A at the Second β Turn/Hinge Region The residues near K54, G55, and Y56 are shown. (a) Second β turn in the V49A monomer. (b) V49A hinge region in the domain-swapped dimer. (c) G55A domain-swapped dimer hinge region. The residue from the strand in the domain-swapped pair is denoted as G55′, for example. Non-carbon atoms are color coded with blue for nitrogen and red for oxygen. The electron density around the residue of the hinge region is contoured at 1σ Structure 2001 9, 1017-1027DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00667-0)

Figure 3 The Time and Protein Concentration Dependency of Domain Swapping in G55A and V49A Revealed by Size Exclusion Chromatography (a) At the high concentration (1250 μM) G55A is primarily a dimer. (b) Dilution of 1250 μM G55A protein to a lower concentration (100 μM) shifted the equilibrium to the monomer and resulted in an approximately equal amount of monomer and dimer. (c) Further dilution to 15 μM resulted in an even higher percentage of the monomer over the dimer. Experiments (b) and (c) are measured after reequilibration of diluted G55A from the 1250 μM stock after 8 days. Comparing (a), (b), and (c) revealed a shift toward a higher monomer-to-dimer ratio, with a decrease in protein concentration. (d) Freshly refolded G55A at 15 μM runs as a monomer. Comparing (d) with (c) showed that even at 15 μM there is a slow monomer-to-dimer conversion that takes days to complete. (e) A high concentration of V49A (3100 μM) is predominantly the monomer but shows a small amount of the dimer. (f) WT runs as a monomer at the highest concentration tested. “D” and “M” represent where the dimer and monomer elute from the column. The vertical units are OD280-relative units that reflect the overall protein concentration. The horizontal units correspond to the elution volume from the analytical Superdex-75 size exclusion column Structure 2001 9, 1017-1027DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00667-0)

Figure 4 The G55A Domain-Swapped Dimer (a) The G55A crystal structure reveals a domain-swapped dimer related by a crystallographic 2-fold axis. Red lines represent the Cα of A55. The symmetrically opposed Cα of A55 and its symmetry mate are 3.9 Å apart. (b) An overlay of G55A (blue) and V49A (yellow) domain-swapped dimers. The hinge angle difference is about 58° between the two monomer lobes Structure 2001 9, 1017-1027DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00667-0)

Figure 5 The Hydrogen Bonding Pattern in the Hinge-Loop Region The hinge-loop includes residues 53–56, which in WT is the second β turn and in V49A and G55A is the hinge region. The four hydrogen bonds (H bonds) in the WT turn are shown with green dashed lines. The V49A molecule has six H bonds, whereas G55A has six H bonds with classical distances plus two long H bonds (gray dashed line) that are 3.3 Å between donor and acceptor atoms. In the V49A molecule, D53 has a positive φ angle and D53′ has a negative φ angle. This asymmetry reflects the different H bonding patterns between the V49A and G55A hinge regions Structure 2001 9, 1017-1027DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00667-0)

Figure 6 An Overlay of the K54G and WT* Structures Shown in green are Cα representations of the WT crystal structure overlaid with the K54G structure (magenta). The K54G substitution removes the Cβ-carbonyl oxygen clashing without changing the second β turn conformation. Typical distances for O-N-Cβ are 3.7–4.2 Å, and those for Cβ-O are 3.0–3.4 Å, whereas in the WT* structure the Cβ and carbonyl oxygen distance is 2.76 Å Structure 2001 9, 1017-1027DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00667-0)

Figure 7 Overlay of G15A and WT* Structures The G15A substitution (blue) creates unfavorable van der Waals contacts between the Cβ atom of A15 and adjacent carbonyl oxygens from A15 and N14. However, despite the additional strain G15A mutant remains monomeric. WT* is shown in green Structure 2001 9, 1017-1027DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00667-0)