Cards Against Humanity & Public Opinion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Scientific Study of Research Questions
Advertisements

10.3 Estimating a Population Proportion
Public Opinion and Political Action (Ch. 11 Review) Goals: 1. Explain the importance of polls and their influence in politics and government. 2. How is.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Inference for Counts:
CHAPTER 8: Producing Data Sampling ESSENTIAL STATISTICS Second Edition David S. Moore, William I. Notz, and Michael A. Fligner Lecture Presentation.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 19 Confidence Intervals for Proportions.
1 Hypothesis testing & Chi-square COMM Nan Yu Fall 2007.
Can a sample size of 1500 people accurately reflect the opinion of the entire country?
11.1 Forming Public Opinion Ms. Nesbit Civics and Economics.
Data to be released after chamber annual meeting and Methodology Statement.
Methodology Sample of 402 Interviews conducted between August 19-30, 2015 Screening qualifications included West Virginia residency, current voter registration,
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Introductions Syllabus Introductions B-day Problem.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Introductions Syllabus Introductions B-day Problem.
Institute for Social Policy and Understanding American Muslim Poll: Politics, Priorities and Prejudice in 2016.
Overcoming Barriers to Change
Basic Statistics The Chi Square Test of Independence.
Solution: D. Solution: D Confidence Intervals for Proportions Chapter 18 Confidence Intervals for Proportions Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Public Opinion and Political Action
Statistics 200 Lecture #9 Tuesday, September 20, 2016
Chapter 9 Warranted Inferences. Chapter 9 Warranted Inferences.
ABSTRACT        The topic of our study was “Is your cumulative Grade Point Average (GPA) higher for living in a two or more parent household rather than.
Chapter 11 Asking and Answering Questions About The Difference Between Two Population Proportions Created by Kathy Fritz.
Public Opinion Views that people hold on public issues
The Logic of Scientific Causal Inference
Exam 1 Review GOVT 120.
Chapter Seven Public Opinion.
Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing
Testing Hypotheses about Proportions
Section 8.4 Day 2.
Close Reading - Generating Material
Hypothesis Testing Review
Exam 1 Review GOVT 120.
Inference for Sampling
The Scientific Method.
Module 02 Research Strategies.
How the Japanese See Themselves, the U.S. and Their World
Inferential Statistics
Week 11 Chapter 17. Testing Hypotheses about Proportions
Political Science Scope and Methods
Federalist Papers Activity
The Scientific Method.
The Scientific Method.
The Scientific Method.
Sociological Research Methods
Chapter 11: Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Exam 5 Review GOVT 201.
The Scientific Method.
Significance Tests: The Basics
15.1 Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Public Opinion: Divided by Race?
Political Science Scope and Methods
& Political Socialization
Political Socialization
Significance Tests: The Basics
Contingency Tables.
The Scientific Method.
8th Grade Science Content Standard
MATH 2311 Section 6.1.
Inference for Sampling
SAGE Lecture Spark [11/06/18] The Publisher of the Social Sciences.
Social Research Methods
Chapter 9: Significance Testing
Warm Up A Gallup poll asked 1600 adults in the U.S. “Did you attend church in the past 7 days?” 715 people said yes. Assume the survey used a simple.
Chapter 4 Summary.
Quantitative design: Ungraded review questions
Puerto Rican Diaspora Findings and Recommendations from two statewide surveys in Florida and New York May 2019.
STA 291 Summer 2008 Lecture 20 Dustin Lueker.
STA 291 Spring 2008 Lecture 17 Dustin Lueker.
8th Grade Science Content Standard
List of your team members Member 1 Member 2 Member 3
Presentation transcript:

Cards Against Humanity & Public Opinion Lindsay Hundley PS/IR 101Z (Summer 2018)

CAH Public Opinion Polling Conducting public opinion polls every month since October 2017. Random sampling using random digit dialing – includes both cell phones and landlines. Data available at https://thepulseofthenation.com.

Another U.S. Civil War? Survey Question: Do you think it is likely or unlikely that there will be a Civil War in the United States within the next decade? Likely Unlikely Don’t know/Refused to Answer What factors might explain why some people think the United States is at risk of Civil War while others do not? Political Party? Age? Race? … … Whether people would prefer Darth Vader to be President?

Preference of Darth Vader or Donald Trump Survey Question: Who would you prefer as president of the United States, Darth Vader or Donald Trump? Darth Vader Donald Trump Don’t know/Refused to Answer Do you think people who’d prefer Darth Vader would be more or less likely to think the U.S. is at risk of civil war?

Formalizing our hypothesis… Hypothesis: People who’d prefer Darth Vader as president are more likely to think there will be a civil war in the United States than people who’d prefer Donald Trump. What’s the IV? Preference of Darth Vader vs. Donald Trump What’s the DV? Belief that another U.S. civil war is likely.

Articulating a Connecting Logic… Why would people who’d prefer Darth Vader be more likely to think the U.S. is at risk of civil war? Proposal: People who’d prefer Darth Vader are more willing to rebel against the government (maybe they’re already plotting something…)

What Assumptions am I Making? Assume that people who’d prefer Darth Vader would be less likely to be deterred by the cost of rebelling against a strong government. Is this a reasonable assumption? How justify? Fearon & Laitin (2003) suggest no, but maybe willingness to incur costs of rebellion depends on how motivated people are?

What data patterns should we expect? If our hypothesis is correct, we would expect to see a higher percentage of people who prefer Darth Vader as president than those who prefer Donald Trump believing that civil war is likely. If our hypothesis is incorrect, we would expect to see either: a similar percentage of people who Prefer Darth Vader and who prefer Donald Trump believing civil war is likely. OR more people who prefer Donald Trump believing civil war is likely.

Results For convenience, let’s drop the “Don’t know/Refuse to Answer Respondents” Darth Vader Donald Trump Don’t Know/ Refuse to Answer Likely 148 115 49 Unlikely 150 362 113 16 13 34 Darth Vader Donald Trump Likely 148 115 Unlikely 150 362

Results Now calculate % of Darth Vader “Supporters” who think civil war is likely/unlikely. And do the same for Donald Trump “Supporters.” Darth Vader Donald Trump Likely 49.6% (148) 24.1% (115) Unlikely 50.3% (150) 75.9% (362)

Is there support for our hypothesis? Yes! 49.6% of Darth Vader supporters think that it is likely that there will be another U.S. civil war, compared to only 24.1% of Donald Trump supporters. This is a 25.5 percentage point difference! How likely would we have observed these results by chance? Using online calculator, we get  χ2/df  =  53.43. The corresponding p-value = 0.000 (Very significant) Darth Vader Donald Trump Likely 49.6% (148) 24.1% (115) Unlikely 50.3% (150) 75.9% (362)

Acknowledge weaknesses in data analysis What is our margin of error? Is our sample non-representative entirely due to a bad luck of the draw? Our sample size is 775 (148+115+150+362) Using online calculator, our margin of error is 3.5%. What about non-sampling error? Are you concerned about the way questions were asked? What if it the sample was PS101 students? Other potential weaknesses: Are there other connecting logics that could be explaining the relationship between preference for Vader and belief civil war is likely? Could our relationship be spurious?

In conclusion… People who’d prefer Darth Vader as President over Donald Trump are more likely to believe that the U.S. is at risk of civil war. While this paper proposed that the reason for this relationship is that people who’d prefer Darth Vader are more likely to envision mobilizing against the state, other connecting logics could be at play. For instance, … Future research should directly test these competing causal logics. For example, researchers could ask additional questions about whether the respondent could envision rebelling against the state…

Other fun finds in CAH data

Common Sense versus Science! People who rely on common sense over science are more likely to support military action against Russia.

Ideological (In)consistency? 70% of democrats do not believe that Muslims are at least partly to blame for acts of terrorism committed in the name of Islam. They say no because blaming an entire group of people for violence committed by a fringe minority is a textbook example of prejudice. Yet, 64% of Democrats think that Trump supporters are at least partly to blame for Charlottesville. 74% of Republicans think that people should be free to express their political opinions in the workplace without getting fired. And yet, 81% think that professional athletes should NOT be allowed to sit or kneel during the national anthem as part of a political protest.

The Real Threat to American Jobs… People who have seen more than one Transformers movie are more likely to worry that their robots will replace their jobs!