Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment with transoesophageal echocardiography: 2D vs 3D imaging B. Cowie, R. Kluger, M. Kalpokas British Journal of Anaesthesia Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 201-206 (February 2013) DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes350 Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Box plots of EDV, ESV, and EF measured by the three techniques. The middle lines represent medians and boxes represent the 25th to 75th percentile. All outliers are shown as points. EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2013 110, 201-206DOI: (10.1093/bja/aes350) Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Bland–Altman plots of EDV, ESV, and EF by the three techniques: 2D, xPlane, and 3D. The numbers in brackets beneath the biases are the 95% confidence intervals for the biases. EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2013 110, 201-206DOI: (10.1093/bja/aes350) Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions