Training & Education Branch CIMIC - COE Training & Education Branch LTC Jan Brouwer Branch Head Training and Education CIMIC Centre of Excellence

Program of Work: CCOE as Department Head NATO Accredited Department Head for CIMIC EFT’s Certified courses SAGE Developments System Approach to Training & Education CCOE Modify TRA: Requirements SHAPE/HQ’s Course Assessment  TNA Solutions Quality Assurance Satellite New Other CCOE as DH is responsible for executing the so called NATO’s System Approach to Training. This is the core function as a DH. We support SHAPE and ACT in this TRA process. An important guidance on Requirements is the SAGE (Saceur’s Annual Guidance on Education) A TRA needs to be assessed and we as DH need to match all current solutions (=trainings from COE, NATO and/or other countries or institutions like FINCENT/SWEDINT). If we still lacking a solution for a Requirements we need to develop this. Like a course or even a simple vignette in an existing course. So we are responsible for CIMIC courses on all levels based on NATO’s ACO Requirements. Not only in the house, also elsewhere were we are allowed to certify courses from “listed” to “approved”. This constant evaluation process will be translated into a DAP. This will be our (yearly) physical “responsibility report” to ACT and NATO of how we follow and organizes the CIMIC discipline as a DH. The overall naming for the entire process is “Program of Work” Revision based on requirements and needs. At the ADC to align with CoI. Discipline Alignment Plan

Non-NATO (partner) members CCOE - Key Stakeholders - Sponsoring Nations ACT/ACO NCS/NFS CIMIC Units Satellite TRA/PoW CIMIC Training T&E Non-NATO (partner) members MTT/Tailor made UNCMCOORD UN EU Disciplinery Lead CCOE as an institute has the mentioned entities as Stakeholders. What do they mean for T&E (….more or less) Course spt and dev EU (Countries) US SOCOM

Collective Training & Exercises Learning model -CCOE Reference to Systematic Approach- 100 REMEMBER 200 UNDERSTAND 300 APPLY 400 EXCEL 500 LEADERSHIP This is a way to look at training evolvement. Developments to a higher level will be achieved on two different ways; by the content from lessons to PO’s and by the way lessons are given, from classroom to exercise. The TRA give PO’s as highest to achieve. But the way to it is a blend including training and exercises. (so hard to gain 500 in classroom….) TRA Analysis Collective Training & Exercises Education Individual Training

CIMIC - T&E Focus- 2016 2017 2018 2019 Exercises Collective Defense Exercises Pyramid/ Pinacle Common Effort CIMIC Capacity Building Assessment Hybrid Threat Resilience Compe- tences Exercises Inter- operability Last year the focus was based on the 3 main items (Coll Def, Hybrid and Resilience) They still are very valid, but we need to revise our complete landscape. Including these past developments. And for the coming 2 years including the EU development, exercises and capacity building. This is besides the revision, which will have priority and more explained in the next slide. 2016 2017 2018 2019

Scenario revision - general CIMIC - Sub projects 360 Revision- Scenario revision - general Support to Steadfast Pyramid Pinnacle (PP) Exercises Pyramid/ Pinacle Common Effort CIMIC Capacity Building NCHCC NCSWC/NCFWC Revision of our 2 main courses. But also finalizing the Awarenss course(s) Revise the scenario used until now. Based on the overall requirements. Support the Steadfast ex with CIMIC knowledge, input, SME’s (SHAPE Level) Support existing HQ’s (Ulm, Arcc, GNC, ….) with CIMIC input like tailor made injects based on actual developments NCBAC CIMIC Events

The Survey Overview and Outlook All comments received  Thank you!! Number of Participants: 25 / 52 (48 %) Emphasize key elements necessary for our revision Full outcome survey available if wished To be continued….?

360 Revision of CCOE Courses Observation / Comments: Remarks about the scope of the revision. What is the landscape? Is it part of the overall scheduling at CCOE since 2015. What’s next? Only NATO?

No clear picture, so what is CCOE doing? Cycles of reviewing training Solutions No clear picture, so what is CCOE doing?

Experimenting in all our courses  excellent results! Modelling & Simulation This (partially) assessment of methodology is based on CCOE’s estimation; it is a novelty and we some how expect that it is an important support to our solutions! Experimenting in all our courses  excellent results! Intention to use it in all courses This solution methodology is also based on needs/requirements

CCOE pays many attention to M&S during both CoI and ADC! Modelling & Simulation M&S methodology CCOE pays many attention to M&S during both CoI and ADC!

Use of Scenarios As said before with M&S, T&E is looking at the methodology needed. (partly executed by a small TNA) We have reviewed the recommendations in the survey and it will be incorporated in the revision process of T&E So starting with the survey, discussing with the CoI these days in Rome….to be continued!

Are all topics equally important? Real World Events in Scenarios Are all topics equally important? In a fast changing world, can all main events be addressed properly or do we need to prioritize in order to facilitate up to date and timely training?

Operational experience to be added to T &E Much experienced has been offered from numerous institutions to CCOE: Thank you! MSPOTC; 1 CMI Command; Bundeswehr C. and Staff College; NFIU; Peace Support Training Centre, CAN; Army Intelligence Centre, Denmark; NFIU Bulgaria; Pax for Peace; JFCB J9; 1 CMI Command; SHAPE J9; CCOMC

Exercises as such will receive more focus from CCOE Specific Exercises for CIMIC Training Exercises as such will receive more focus from CCOE Mentioned are: JOCO, Trident series, VIKING series, actually all exrcises CIMIC is included (including cultural oriented exercises…)

Summary - Revision Higher Command Course Q15 The NATO Higher Command Course (NCHCC) has been designed for Senior Military and civilian leadership. In revising the NCHCC, it will be critical to meet the requirements of a fast changing security environment. Please rank these specific training requirements and assess how they can best be taught in your understanding?

Revision Higher Command Course - NCHCC

Revision Higher Command Course - NCHCC

Revision Higher Command Course - NCHCC

Revision Higher Command Course - NCHCC

Revision Higher Command Course - NCHCC

Revision Higher Command Course - NCHCC

Revision Higher Command Course - NCHCC

Revision Higher Command Course - NCHCC

Summary - Revision Higher Command Course In summary:

Modelling & Simulation Scenario’s and vignettes The Syndicates Modelling & Simulation Cross Cutting Topics Scenario’s and vignettes NCHCC Receive introduction in scope and opportunities of the use of Modelling & Simulation in CIMIC training and discuss content, priorities and scheduling of implementation. Syndicate to gather and discuss specific CCT, real life events and developments which are to be prioritized and incorporated into CIMIC training within a 12 – 24 month implementation horizon. Participants will discuss and assess the use of available/approved current scenarios with CIMIC content, versus the shorter term use and development of specialized vignettes in the Course landscape to provide a training environment reflecting actual situations. Validate and update identified requirements of HQs and related structures regarding CMI/CIMIC T&E and the way to effectively implement these findings in the NCHCC within a 12 month timeframe.

The syndicate outcomes…. NCHCC: Will be used as a part (…) of the TNA revision for the course To be continued Reflected in DAP 18 M&S and Scenarios Will be used as a methodology to “align” our solutions CCT/Real life events: Can be seen as part of the “Requirements” Needs to be incorporated in revision All outcomes will be reviewed and assessed. We need feedback! CCOE T&E is aiming for a continuous alignment with actualities and current demands. This ADC will hopefully give input to the question “How” to organize and structure this.