Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Advertisements

Involvement of chloride channels in hepatic copper metabolism: ClC-4 promotes copper incorporation into ceruloplasmin  Ting Wang, Steven A. Weinman  Gastroenterology 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Regulation of Mast Cell Survival by IgE
The Mitochondrial Protein hTID-1 Partners With the Caspase-Cleaved Adenomatous Polyposis Cell Tumor Suppressor to Facilitate Apoptosis  Jiang Qian, Erin.
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2003)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Involvement of chloride channels in hepatic copper metabolism: ClC-4 promotes copper incorporation into ceruloplasmin  Ting Wang, Steven A. Weinman  Gastroenterology 
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 140, Issue 4, Pages e1 (April 2011)
Spleen Tyrosine Kinase Mediates EGFR Signaling to Regulate Keratinocyte Terminal Differentiation  Nan-Lin Wu, Duen-Yi Huang, Li-Fang Wang, Reiji Kannagi,
IGF-II-Mediated COX-2 Gene Expression in Human Keratinocytes Through Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway  Hye Jung Kim, Tae-Yoon Kim  Journal.
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Lamp-2a Facilitates MHC Class II Presentation of Cytoplasmic Antigens
Decreased Growth Inhibitory Responses of Squamous Carcinoma Cells to Interferon-γ Involve Failure to Recruit cki Proteins into cdk2 Complexes  Beth L.
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Identification and Characterization of an IκB Kinase
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Rafael Gongora, Robert P Stephan, Zhixin Zhang, Max D Cooper  Immunity 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Regulation of Mast Cell Survival by IgE
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Noritaka Oyama, Keiji Iwatsuki, Yoshimi Homma, Fumio Kaneko 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
The Drosophila CLOCK Protein Undergoes Daily Rhythms in Abundance, Phosphorylation, and Interactions with the PER–TIM Complex  Choogon Lee, Kiho Bae,
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Olivier Micheau, Jürg Tschopp  Cell 
Interleukin-6-Resistant Melanoma Cells Exhibit Reduced Activation of STAT3 and Lack of Inhibition of Cyclin E-Associated Kinase Activity  Markus Böhm,
Laura Lande-Diner, Jianmin Zhang, Howard Cedar  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
CD28 Signaling via VAV/SLP-76 Adaptors
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 116, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Matt Yasuo Pecot, Vivek Malhotra  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 1996)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
CTLA-4 Regulates Induction of Anergy In Vivo
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Rsk1 mediates a MEK–MAP kinase cell survival signal
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Nathalie Schmitt, Yang Liu, Salah-Eddine Bentebibel, Hideki Ueno 
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
LAT Links the Pre-BCR to Calcium Signaling
Targeted Cleavage of Signaling Proteins by Caspase 3 Inhibits T Cell Receptor Signaling in Anergic T Cells  Irene Puga, Anjana Rao, Fernando Macian  Immunity 
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Notch 1 Signaling Regulates Peripheral T Cell Activation
The CD28 Signaling Pathway Regulates Glucose Metabolism
RhoA GTPase Regulates B Cell Receptor Signaling
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 47-56 (January 1997) Induction of Cell Cycle Arrest and B Cell Terminal Differentiation by CDK Inhibitor p18 INK4c and IL-6  Leslie Morse, Dongquan Chen, David Franklin, Yue Xiong, Selina Chen-Kiang  Immunity  Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 47-56 (January 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80241-1

Figure 1 IL-6 Induces Cell Death in B Cell Terminal Differentiation (A) Selection of terminally differentiated B cells. CESS cells were cultured in the presence (+IL-6) or absence (−IL-6) of IL-6 for 5 days. MHC class II–negative (Free) and class II–positive (Bound) cells were separated by the use of HLA-beads, stained for intracellular IgG (red), surface MHC class II (green), and DAPI (blue) to localize the cell nucleus, and analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy. The small spheres present in the bound fraction represent HLA-beads that remained associated with cells after the staining procedure. (B) IL-6 induces the death of differentiated B cells. Left: CESS cells were cultured with (+IL-6) or without (−IL-6) IL-6 for 6 days. After separation by the use of HLA-beads, the MHC-positive cells (Bound) were cultured in the absence of IL-6. The MHC class II–negative cells were cultured in the presence (Free +IL-6) or absence (Free −IL-6) of IL-6, as were the control cells without separation (+IL-6, −IL-6). Right: CESS (MHC class II–positive) and NJBC (MHC class II–negative) were subject to the HLA bead separation procedure and cultured in the absence of IL-6. The viable cells were determined by trypan blue staining (in duplicates) on days after separation as indicated. Immunity 1997 6, 47-56DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80241-1)

Figure 2 IL-6 Induces Cell Cycle Arrest (A) Simultaneous cell cycle arrest and differentiation. CESS cells were incubated in the presence (+IL-6) or absence (−IL-6) of IL-6 for days indicated, labeled with BrdU and stained for intracellular IgG (red), BrdU (green), and DAPI (blue) to localize the nucleus. (B) Time course of cell cycle arrest and differentiation. The presence (Ighi) or absence (Iglo) of enhanced intracellular IgG, and the presence (BrdU+) or absence (BrdU−) of BrdU incorporation were determined on days of IL-6 treatment as in (A). At least 500 stained cells were characterized for each time point shown in the histogram, and the error bars were derived from five samplings in a typical experiment. The experiment was performed six times. Immunity 1997 6, 47-56DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80241-1)

Figure 3 Inhibition of pRb Phosphorylation by IL-6 (A) IL-6 suppresses pRb phosphorylation. pRb in CESS cells (5 × 106) left untreated (0) or treated with IL-6 (30 U/ml) for days indicated was analyzed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. The phosphorylated forms (ppRB) and hypophosphorylated pRb (pRB) are indicated. (B) pRb is hypophosphorylated in differentiated cells. pRb in CESS cells treated with IL-6 for 6 days and unseparated (+IL-6) or separated into differentiated (Free) and undifferentiated (Bound) populations by the use of HLA-beads was analyzed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. Each lane represents 5 × 106 cells of each population. (C) Phosphorylation of newly synthesized pRb is inhibited by IL-6. pRb in CESS cells (1 × 107) was labeled with [35S]-methionine for 3 hr on days of IL-6 treatment as indicated and analyzed by immunoprecipitation. (D) IL-6 regulates the ratios of pRB to ppRB. The relative intensities of steady-state pRB and ppRB as shown in Figure 3A (closed squares) and biosynthetically labeled pRB and ppRB as shown in Figure 3C (open triangles) were determined by scanning and are expressed as ratios of pRB to ppRB. Immunity 1997 6, 47-56DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80241-1)

Figure 4 p21 Is Activated in IL-6–Differentiated Cells (A) Time course of p21 activation. p21 in CESS cells (1 × 107), left untreated (0) or treated with IL-6 for days indicated, was analyzed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. (B) p21 is activated in differentiated cells. The p21 levels in CESS cells left untreated (0) or treated with IL-6 for 5 days and unseparated (+IL-6) or separated into differentiated (Free) and undifferentiated (Bound) populations were analyzed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. Each lane represents 3 × 106 cells of each population. The 14C-labeled molecular weight markers (in kilodaltons) are shown at left. (C) The relative intensity of p21 shown in Figure 4A was determined by densitometry scanning, with the p21 level in untreated cells arbitrarily set as 1. Immunity 1997 6, 47-56DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80241-1)

Figure 5 IL-6 Activates p18 Synthesis and Its Association with CDK6 (A) IL-6 enhances the association of p18 with CDK6. p18 and CDK6 were immunoprecipitated with anti-p18-C or anti-CDK6, with or without preincubation with antigenic peptides, from 1 × 107 CESS cells left untreated or treated with IL-6 for 5 days. The immune complexes were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-CDK6. (B) Time course of IL-6–induced p18 activation and p18-CDK6 association. p18 and CDK6 were immunoprecipitated with anti-p18-C or anti-CDK6 from 4 × 107 CESS cells at hours after IL-6 treatment as indicated. The immune complexes were analyzed by sequential blotting with anti-p18 (directed against recombinant p18) and anti-CDK6. (C) IL-6 activates the association of newly synthesized p18 and CDK6. [35S]-methionine–labeled CDK6- and CDK6-associated proteins were immunoprecipitated from CESS cells (1 × 107) left untreated (0) or treated with IL-6 for 96 hr, with or without preincubation with the CDK6 antigenic peptide as indicated. The proteins in the immune complexes were resolved by SDS–PAGE. The migrations of CDK6, p18, and the 14C-labeled protein markers (in kilodaltons) are marked. Immunity 1997 6, 47-56DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80241-1)

Figure 6 IL-6 Activates IgM Synthesis but Not Cell Cycle Arrest (A) IL-6 activates IgM synthesis but not cell cycle arrest. SKW cells were incubated in the presence (+IL-6) or absence (−IL-6) of IL-6 (50 U/ml) for 2 days, labeled with BrdU and stained for intracellular IgM (red), BrdU (green), and DAPI. (B) IL-6 does not affect the growth or viability of IgM-bearing cells. SKW cells were incubated in the presence or absence of IL-6 as indicated, stained with trypan blue, and counted to determine cell growth and viability. Immunity 1997 6, 47-56DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80241-1)

Figure 7 Overexpression of p18 and IL-6 Stimulation Reconstitutes Coupled Cell Cycle Arrest and Differentiation (A) Overexpression of p18 causes cell cycle arrest. SKW cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding CD4, or CD4 and p18 together, and cultured in the presence (+IL-6) or absence of IL-6 (−IL-6) for 48 hr as indicated. BrdU was added to the medium for the last 24 hr before staining for intracellular IgM (red), BrdU (green), and DAPI (blue). The small red spheres represent the anti-CD4 magnetic beads used for selecting transfected cells that remained after the staining procedure. Arrowheads mark representative CD4+BrdU−IgMlo cells transfected with CD4 and p18; CD4+BrdU+ IgMhi cells transfected with CD4 and treated with IL-6; and CD4+BrdU−IgMhi and CD4+BrdU+IgMhi cells transfected with both CD4 and p18 and treated with IL-6. At least 500 cells were characterized for each panel shown. This experiment was performed four times. (B) Enhanced expression of p18 and p18-CDK6 association in p18-transfected cells. SKW cells (8 × 106) were transfected with various amounts (micrograms) of CD4 and p18 expression plasmids, as well as the vector for p18 as indicated. Immunoprecipitation with anti-p18 peptide antibody and sequential blotting with anti-p18 and anti-CDK6 antibodies were performed as described in Figure 5B. This experiment was performed four times. Immunity 1997 6, 47-56DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80241-1)