Unpacking the prescribed titles Journal #11

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
9 x9 81 4/12/2015 Know Your Facts!. 9 x2 18 4/12/2015 Know Your Facts!
Advertisements

1 x0 0 4/15/2015 Know Your Facts!. 9 x1 9 4/15/2015 Know Your Facts!
1 x0 0 4/16/2015 Know Your Facts!. 1 x8 8 4/16/2015 Know Your Facts!
3 x0 0 7/18/2015 Know Your Facts!. 4 x3 12 7/18/2015 Know Your Facts!
Tok Essays tok May 2015 examination session Instructions to candidates! Your theory of knowledge essay for examination must be submitted to.
4 x1 4 10/18/2015 Know Your Facts!. 5 x /18/2015 Know Your Facts!
3 x0 0 10/18/2015 Know Your Facts!. 11 x /18/2015 Know Your Facts!
Agenda Announcements: Midterm due on Sunday November 16 by 5 pm in dropbox; Title your paper “FI Last Name Midterm” No class this week! Example entries.
Multiplication Facts X 3 = 2. 8 x 4 = 3. 7 x 2 =
TAKS Reading Process Analyze the Task Activate Prior Knowledge Plan and Predict Read Use Information.
My Reading Journal Student: __________________________.
Presentation Title.
Presentation Title.
TOK essay building: Groupwork exercise
Understanding Prescribed Titles
AS to A Level Understanding the standard
STRUCTURE OF A MEMORIAL
Political theory and law
Structure of exam question
TOK ESSAY The title sets the scope of the question. Your job is to find the knowledge issues within that scope. Then, decide what AoK and WoK to include:
Are you ready for the Literacy Test?
TOK - Theory of Knowledge.
Developing approaches to learning skills Step 1Objective strand: Approaches to learning skill: Step 2Explicit learning experience: Step 3Implicit learning.
Putting Knowledge into Practice
What is an historical factor? Examples of factors in history…
Using Secondary Sources [Secondary Sources.pptx]
Investigating science
TOK- Introduction.
قواعد الاختبارات التحصيلية
סדר דין פלילי – חקיקה ומהות ההליך הפלילי
AS LEVEL Paper One – Section A / B
Implicit Differentiation
Section 1: What is ‘developed’ explanation?
Ecology Review posters
Learn Your 2x Facts.
Journal: Write down as many observations about the photo as you can
Group 1 Group 1 Group 1 Group 1 word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word.

Test. essai.
Суури мэдлэг Basic Knowledge
Prescribed title.
The Mid Tudors A2 Evaluation and enquiry questions
History Assessments – Paper 2
Persuasive Essays The Planning Process
An introduction to Theory of Knowledge
NET History Exam Skills
STARS: Strategies to Achieve Reading Success
40A Final Exam Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Paragraph Organization
Title: Paper 1 Assessment Date: Monday 15th May 2017
= x 2 = = 20 4 x 5 = = 16 4 x 4 = = 18 6 x 3 = = 12 2 x 6 = 12.
A very brief mark scheme…
You must show all steps of your working out.
Section 1: What is ‘developed’ explanation?
Question 1.
Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric
Journal: Think about the emotions being portrayed in and about the story behind the photograph above. What details do you notice that help you develop.
Today Arrange yourself into groups of 4-6.
Presentation Title Your information.
Question.
DBQ.
QUESTION: Compare and contrast the policies of Alexander II ( ) and Alexander III ( ) of Russia. (May 2006) Topic: Time Frame: Argument: Analyse:
< Enter Lesson Title >
Structuring an Essay.
Title Introduction Body Conclusion Preview of the essay
Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma
TOK Essay: Unpacking the Title
Presentation transcript:

Unpacking the prescribed titles Journal #11 TOK Essay Unpacking the prescribed titles Journal #11

TOK ESSAY May 2017 5. Given access to the same facts, how is it possible that there can be disagreement between experts in a discipline? Develop your answer with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Answer the following in Journal #11 for per Answer the following in Journal #11 for per. title #5– be thorough & detailed in your answers Identify key words in the prescribed title and consider their meaning with respect to the relevant arguments. What are the explicit and implicit demands in the title? In what way is the assertions/position in the title defensible/contestable/provocative? Is the title itself an explicit or implicit knowledge question? Practice rephrasing it in your own words. What are the associated knowledge concepts? What 2 areas of knowledge would work well with this title? Now, write two-three knowledge questions on the title 5. Given access to the same facts, how is it possible that there can be disagreement between experts in a discipline? Develop your answer with reference to two areas of knowledge.