The CSES Questionnaire Design Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation Council Meeting Structure and Resources Background: The Implementation Council (Council) roles and responsibilities are described in the.
Advertisements

Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Proposals A Template. In Organizations & Workplaces: proposals… 1.Clarify work agreements within and outside the organization 2.Set forth your productivity.
Internet Surveys and the CSES David Howell University of Michigan Cyberinfrastructure and National Election Studies.
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
United Nations Statistics Division
How an idea becomes an IEC standard Gary Johnson Chairman IEC SC45A
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 February 2011 How to apply: Legal Framework – Beneficiaries – Application and Selection Procedure.
Dataset presentation: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Agata Kwiatkowska.
Introduction 1. Purpose of the Chapter 2. Institutional arrangements Country Practices 3. Legal framework Country Practices 4. Preliminary conclusions.
Ninth Annual Meeting of the WG: Objectives and Agenda Jennifer H. Madans U.S.A.
1 REVIMP From review to improvement Dr. Adrie Visscher Faculty of Behavioural Sciences The Netherlands.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
4th Quality Conference (4QC) Impact Assessment Study Rui Sousa, PhD Catholic University of Portugal Lisbon, 16 July 2007.
The Energy Statistics Compilers Manual - with focus on energy accounts Session on International Energy Statistics London Group on Environmental Accounting.
The GLP is funded by The Department for International Development GLOBAL LEARNING T Task – -Please go through the slides and follow the instructions -Please.
Introduction to The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Jessica Fortin GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences David.
NASCE: Programme requirements Paul Ridgway. Need for NASCE? Cost of Skills training Pressures for training outside service hours Pressures for training.
June 2004 Marisa Agostinelli. Tutors’ meeting programme REPORTING AND REFLECTING on the teachers’ training course.REPORTING AND REFLECTING BREAKING NEWS:
Report of the Technical Subcommittee Mario Bergeron, Technical Subcommittee Chair/NGEC Vice Chair.
The Joint ECE-Eurostat programme on the new recommendations for the 2010 round of Population and Housing Censuses in the ECE region Joint ECE-Eurostat.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation GA Meeting 21/22 January 2016 Partners: UK and Canada.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Overview
The New SACS All the Questions You Wanted to Ask about Accreditation, and Even Some You Didn’t…
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates
Mapping of barriers to social inclusion of young people in vulnerable situations DRAFT report consultations Strasbourg, October 1, 2014.
National planning for Open Research euroCRIS 2017, 30 May 2017
Meeting Procedure.
Task force on statistical units: survey of current practices
University Resource Alignment: Goals and Process
RESEARCH TOOLS FOR UNDERSTANDING SPORTS CONSUMERS
The future of disability statistics within the ESS Agenda point 3.6
Briefing on Action points
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Improving Question Evaluation for Federal Surveys: The Beginning
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)
Digital Stewardship Curriculum
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Presentation and Evaluation
seriss myEVS portal for the EVS 2017 survey
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
Education and Training Statistics Working Group Meeting of 17 November 2010 Item 5 – Further actions Eurostat in regard to the follow up of the feasibility.
5QC Update IPSG Meeting Lisbon, 15 November 2007
X-DIS/XBRL Phase 2 Kick-Off
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
DG Troika – 26 October – Portugal
Gender Based Violence State of Play Item 4 of the draft agenda
Qualtrics for data collection
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EUPAN
The EES 2009 & PIREDEU In search of a more ‘permanent’ solution
Strengthening the Role of EQAVET National Reference Points
REFIT Platform 20/02/2019 Diversity Europe Group.
Item 4.2 – Towards the 2016 AES Philippe Lombardo Eurostat-F5
Recommendation CM/Rec(2017)4 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Youth Work 19/05/2019.
Solving Problems in Groups
District of Innovation
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Formalizing the Wireless Chair’s Meeting
WPFS PROGRAMME OF WORK WPFS October 2008 by Michèle Chavoix-Mannato OECD/STD.
5.b3 Monitoring & Reporting 2019
Report of the Technical Subcommittee
The Nuts and Bolts of Utilizing an Executive Council
WEST Program Assessments Past and Present
European Safety Survey : News on the draft Council and European Parliament Regulation Task Force Victimisation 17 February 2011.
UNECE-UNODC Task Force on Victim Surveys
Presentation transcript:

The CSES Questionnaire Design Process David Howell University of Michigan dahowell@umich.edu Jessica Fortin GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences jessica.fortin@gesis.org European Survey Research Association (ESRA) Lausanne, Switzerland July, 2011

CSES Questionnaire Over 60 countries participate Common module of survey questions new theme every five years some questions the same some different according to new theme to be run “as is” Administrative, demographic and voting variables to national standards

Questionnaire Design Process

Questionnaire Design Process A lengthy development process Over a three year period, 2008-2011 Iterative As transparent as possible Collaborative, with broad input

Planning Committee Formation A Planning Committee, comprised of, selected by, and informed by collaborators, designs and oversees each Module. Public call for nominations Nominating Committee recommends members Plenary Session confirms list and suggests additional members Result = 20 members from 15 countries

Theme Development Every five years a new module is developed to specifically address a big question in science. Multiple public calls for theme proposals Task Force collects proposals Task Force presents and evaluates proposals for Plenary Session and Planning Committee Theme(s) tentatively decided upon before questionnaire design begins

Questionnaire Development After a theme is arrived at, attention turns to developing the questionnaire for it. Subcommittees formed to pursue the new theme(s) and improvements to past questions Subcommittees return to proposers for revisions to their original proposals Draft questionnaire produced Planning Committee discussion, revision Repeat as necessary

Pretesting The draft questionnaire is pretested cross-nationally in different contexts. Partial pretests in Brazil, Germany, UK Full pretests in Canada, Ireland Reports received from pretest countries

Questionnaire Finalization After having received extensive feedback, the questionnaire can now be finalized. Subcommittees formed to address sections outside of the new theme(s) A Plenary Session provides final feedback Review of pretest results, subcommittees Planning Committee makes final changes Final questionnaire disseminated

Challenges

Design Challenges 10-15 minutes is not much questionnaire time … but, pressure to reduce collaborator burden competing with other content on surveys competing with other comparative studies Existing, validated questions preferred Priority to cross-national questions must be applicable in most all countries must work well across most all countries must be feasible in a variety of study designs

Information Challenges A lot of people are involved Managing and tracking lots of input Reconciling many opinions and approaches Consensus not always possible Making decisions with imperfect information More testing in more contexts would always be better, but relies on volunteers who... Have an election coming up (optimally) Have a funded survey with available space Can produce reports in a timely fashion Eventually decisions must be finalized

Collective Challenges A lot of countries are involved Cross-national and cross-cultural applicability and equivalence Accommodating the variety of institutional arrangements in the many countries Difficult to predict or account for all situations, even with broad cross-national participation in the process

Where to go from here

Where to go from here A formal post-process evaluation We’ve done this a number of times now What worked well, what didn’t Consider improvements Formalize and document process for next time Some possibilities: More extensive pretesting Allow more time for pretesting Test in more cultures and contexts Possible use of focus groups

Where to go from here More focus on cross-national/cultural issues ... concept equivalence ... collaborator/interview instructions ... translation issues More methodological working groups Learning from the approaches of other cross-national studies

Thank you for your time! To learn more about CSES, or to download data: www.cses.org ...or email your questions to: cses@umich.edu