Integrated Safety Assessment as an Instrument for Waste Acceptance Criteria Derivation The inventory and maximal specific activity of radionuclides are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
D:\data\PowerPoint\Maravic\NCP-EURATOM Meeting - CCAB ppt Slide 1 National Contact Points for EURATOM- Information Exchange Meeting October 16,
Advertisements

Environmental Safety Case and Changes to Waste Acceptance Date: 25th April 2012 Dr Richard Cummings – LLWR ESC Project Manager Presentation to: Customer.
Generic Operational Safety Assessment (GOSA) Workshop on the Application of the IAEA Methodology and Safety Assessment Framework (SAFRAN) Tool for the.
The UK Approach - the Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Laura Newsome Scientist – Environment Agency September 2009.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
Challenges in developing a Safety Case WG5. How to Develop a Safety Case SC can be a tool for providing information to stakeholders other than regulators.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Workshop on the Safe Disposal of Low Level Radioactive Waste WG3 debriefing.
Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24.
TM Technical Meeting on the Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste
IAEA Technical Meeting on Future Human Actions at Disposal Sites IAEA, Vienna, Austria September 24-28, 2012 Overview of NRC Approach to Human Intrusion.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.4. Pre-disposal waste management Safety Standards.
Managing deviations from the Design Target with the Safety Case IAEA GEOSAF II Plenary 2014.
September 2014 Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61 Tom Corbett, Governor E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.6. Management of disused sealed sources Technical options and safety aspects.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Nicolas Solente Workshop on Regulatory Requirements to Ensure Safe Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources for Operators and Regulators Amman, JORDAN 7-11 April.
Sessions VI and VII Conclusions and summary Francois Besnus Session Chair Cape Town July 6, 2007.
Evaluation of the radiological consequences of tritium present in radioactive components from fusion reactors Task TW4-TSW-001-D1b: Waste and decommissioning.
Regulatory Approach to Radioactive Waste Management and Remediation in Central Asia Tamara Zhunussova Vienna, IAEA, 6-8 November, 2012.
SAFRAN Upgraded to support the implementation of the Borehole Disposal Concept Rodolfo Avila, Facilia AB.
Chapter 27 The Engineering Design Process. Learning Objectives Describe the various factors that are changing the design process Discuss the steps in.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part VI Planned Exposure Situations - Generic Requirements Module VI.3 Requirements for public exposure in.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
1.Issues concerning the Inventory 2.Issues concerning Gases 3.Site considerations 4.Construction Issues 5.Waste Packaging.
El Cabril near surface disposal facility
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on the Demonstration of Operational and Long Term Safety of Predisposal Management Facilities.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
ENGINEERING AS SOCIAL EXPERIMENTATION
Safety-related Issues for the Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) Dr. Jürgen Wollrath Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) Department Safety.
Management System Part II: Inventory of Radiation Sources – Regulatory Authority Information System (RAIS)
Working Group 3 Murmansk. SC structure – Assessment context has to be more elaborate and detailed – Optimization. Provide justification based on the document.
 B&H authorities, in 1998, established Radioactive Waste Storage Facility in order to accommodate for a relatively long term period the disused sealed.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Technical Services.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Siting Strategies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Requirements for.
Development of a disposal concept WG5. How to deal with the RP Principle Need to educate the public to put the risks in context Public want to see the.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM Technical Meeting to Discuss Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive.
IAEA ASN – Paris1 Work group 1 Outcome of the discussions Topic 2 and 3.
April 13, 2005 Philip Wheatley Incorporation of HLW Activities Within the NSNFP.
International Atomic Energy Agency V. Nys Definition and practical application of demonstration of operational and long-term safety for predisposal RWM.
Laboratory Decommissioning : Essential Tools and Lessons Learned Jim Carscadden Division of Environmental Protection Office of Research Facilities.
Texas supports the requirement for a site-specific analysis and specific dose limit of 25 mrem/yr within the 1,000-year compliance period Texas.
In the name of God. Common Technical Document On Biotech.
1 Introduction to safety case and safety assessment: purpose and content of safety case Ian Crossland Crossland Consulting
Technical Services. Objectives To identify the technical services needed within the infrastructure for an effective implementation of regulatory programme.
The Safety Case Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management Unit
Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
Development of Methodology for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Decommissioning Waste Management Scenarios Decommissioning costing in relation to the waste.
Module Planned exposure situations Public exposure (GSR Part 3)
Report on the outcome from the consultancy
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Product Evaluation Review Questions.
Name: André Rübel Organisation: GRS Date:
Earl Fordham, Deputy Director, Office of Radiation Protection
Olli Nummi, Fortum, Finland
ISO 14001:2015 Identifying Aspects And Impacts
Safety Case Components and Documentation
For more information, please visit the CAST website at:
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
IAEA International Workshop on Safe Disposal of LLW
ISO 14001:2004 Aspects And Impacts
1. Basics of Online Safety
Introduction: IAEA activities / Documents on human intrusion
TM TM on the Safe Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste
SAFRAN Upgraded to support the implementation of the Borehole Disposal Concept Rodolfo Avila, Facilia AB.
IAEA International Workshop on Safe Disposal of LLW
Presentation transcript:

Integrated Safety Assessment as an Instrument for Waste Acceptance Criteria Derivation The inventory and maximal specific activity of radionuclides are not the only but most significant parameters of Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) Safety Assessment (SA) is a necessary tool for derivation of waste acceptance criteria and for demonstration that derived values are safe. When considering disposal facility one should destinguish between Long-term (post-closure) Safety Assessment (LSA) and Operational Safety Assessment (OSA) Both LSA and OSA in general have similar structure and algorithm but scenarios, assumptions, models and instruments are different The main features affected the WAC as LSA results are the following: radionuclide half-life, mobility of each radionuclide, engineered and natural safety barriers retardation properties The main factors affected the WAC as OSA results are: Safety culture, RAW management system, number of workers and there qualification, presence of gamma-emitting radionuclides in the waste Stand alone long-term safety assessment or operational safety assessment are insufficient for derivation of such WAC parameters as the inventory and maximal radionuclide specific activity. Due to the same subject and potential contradictions in assumptions and models an integrated approach in using OSA and LSA for WAC derivation would be beneficial