Quantitative Image Restoration in Bright Field Optical Microscopy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Growth and Morphology of Escherichia coli: Experiments and Stochastic Model  Pradeep Kumar, Albert Libchaber  Biophysical.
Advertisements

Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Multi-Image Colocalization and Its Statistical Significance
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
High-Density 3D Single Molecular Analysis Based on Compressed Sensing
Arikta Biswas, Amal Alex, Bidisha Sinha  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Precision and Variability in Bacterial Temperature Sensing
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages (November 2007)
Stephen R. Norris, Marcos F. Núñez, Kristen J. Verhey 
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Dynamics of the Serine Chemoreceptor in the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane: A High- Speed Single-Molecule Tracking Study  Dongmyung Oh, Yang Yu, Hochan.
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Dongdong Li, Jun Xiong, Anlian Qu, Tao Xu  Biophysical Journal 
Modes of Diffusion of Cholera Toxin Bound to GM1 on Live Cell Membrane by Image Mean Square Displacement Analysis  Pierre D.J. Moens, Michelle A. Digman,
Single Vesicle Assaying of SNARE-Synaptotagmin-Driven Fusion Reveals Fast and Slow Modes of Both Docking and Fusion and Intrasample Heterogeneity  Sune.
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Yong Wang, Paul Penkul, Joshua N. Milstein  Biophysical Journal 
Homodimeric Kinesin-2 KIF3CC Promotes Microtubule Dynamics
Aida Ebrahimi, Laszlo N. Csonka, Muhammad A. Alam  Biophysical Journal 
Qiaochu Li, Stephen J. King, Ajay Gopinathan, Jing Xu 
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Masataka Chiba, Makito Miyazaki, Shin’ichi Ishiwata 
V. Vetri, G. Ossato, V. Militello, M.A. Digman, M. Leone, E. Gratton 
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Xiao-Han Li, Elizabeth Rhoades  Biophysical Journal 
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Fractal Characterization of Chromatin Decompaction in Live Cells
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
3D Protein Dynamics in the Cell Nucleus
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 107, Issue 10, Pages (November 2014)
The Standard Deviation in Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Will J. Eldridge, Zachary A. Steelman, Brianna Loomis, Adam Wax 
Teuta Pilizota, Joshua W. Shaevitz  Biophysical Journal 
Hongqiang Ma, Jianquan Xu, Jingyi Jin, Yi Huang, Yang Liu 
Protein Diffusion in the Periplasm of E. coli under Osmotic Stress
On the Quantification of Cellular Velocity Fields
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Blocking of Single α-Hemolysin Pore by Rhodamine Derivatives
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Motility at High Pressure
Multi-Image Colocalization and Its Statistical Significance
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Quantification of Fluorophore Copy Number from Intrinsic Fluctuations during Fluorescence Photobleaching  Chitra R. Nayak, Andrew D. Rutenberg  Biophysical.
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Felix Ruhnow, Linda Kloβ, Stefan Diez  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 113, Issue 10, Pages (November 2017)
Plasmolysis and Cell Shape Depend on Solute Outer-Membrane Permeability during Hyperosmotic Shock in E. coli  Teuta Pilizota, Joshua W. Shaevitz  Biophysical.
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Yufang Wang, Ling Guo, Ido Golding, Edward C. Cox, N.P. Ong 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Presentation transcript:

Quantitative Image Restoration in Bright Field Optical Microscopy Braulio Gutiérrez-Medina, Manuel de Jesús Sánchez Miranda  Biophysical Journal  Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages 1916-1919 (November 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.002 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 QRBF effectively restores cellular morphology in BF images of single E. coli. (A) Shown here is the x-z intensity distribution of the theoretical PSF used for deconvolution. z = 0 corresponds to in-focus, where image contrast is least. (B–M) Shown here is a cell undergoing division imaged using BF (B–D), QRBF (E–G), DIC (H–J), and fluorescence (F) (K–M) microscopy. The x-z and z-y intensity profiles correspond to the dashed cyan lines of their respective x-y image. QRBF and F images are displayed in false color. z = 0.3 μm in (B). (N–Q) Shown here is validation of QRBF. A cell is observed before (N) and after deconvolution (O). In (O), the cellular contour (black line) and width (straight line) were automatically determined from the QRBF image. (P) The cellular contour identified in (O) was superimposed to the corresponding fluorescence image of the same cell. (Q) Shown here is distribution of cellular widths (W) for a bacterial population (n = 108), measured from BF images deconvolved using a theoretical (black bars) or experimental (gray bars, red online) PSF. The solid line is a Gaussian fit to the theoretical-PSF width distribution (653 ± 73 nm, mean ± SD). The inset displays the width values, showing coincidence between the two types of data. The scale bar represents 2 μm. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1916-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.002) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 High-throughput, automated quantification of bacterial width and length during hyperosmotic shock. (A) Shown here is a 2D-QRBF image of unstained E. coli cells immobilized on a coverslip at [NaCl] = 0.5 M. Insets show enlarged views of cells, evidencing plasmolysis (white arrows). The contours of cells (black lines) were determined automatically. The scale bar represents 5 μm (1 μm, insets). (B) Cell samples exposed to increasing concentrations of NaCl were imaged and processed using 2D-QRBF. The cellular width (W) was plotted against length (L) and 2D histograms were created for four different [NaCl] datasets (0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 M). Histograms were normalized with respect to the maximum bin count. (C) Given here are histograms (P) of width (W) and length (L) for increasing [NaCl], normalized by the number of cells measured in each case. (Insets) Width (Wn) and length (Ln) values were normalized with respect to W and L values at [NaCl] = 0 M, (mean ± SD). For (B) and (C): n = 2283 (0 M); 4596 (0.25 M); 6657 (0.5 M); and 6079 (1 M). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1916-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.002) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions