Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
JAV1 Controls Jasmonate-Regulated Plant Defense
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (May 2011)
Jun-Ho Ha, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung, Chung-Mo Park 
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
The RdDM Pathway Is Required for Basal Heat Tolerance in Arabidopsis
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2017)
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
The WUSCHEL Related Homeobox Protein WOX7 Regulates the Sugar Response of Lateral Root Development in Arabidopsis thaliana  Danyu Kong, Yueling Hao, Hongchang.
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Young-Hee Cho, Sang-Dong Yoo, Jen Sheen  Cell 
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 18, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Turnip Yellow Mosaic Virus P69 Interacts with and Suppresses GLK Transcription Factors to Cause Pale-Green Symptoms in Arabidopsis  Fangrui Ni, Liang.
Xiang Han, Hao Yu, Rongrong Yuan, Yan Yang, Fengying An, Genji Qin
HOS1 Facilitates the Phytochrome B-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Function during Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis  Ju-Heon Kim, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung,
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Arabidopsis ABF3 and ABF4 Transcription Factors Act with the NF-YC Complex to Regulate SOC1 Expression and Mediate Drought-Accelerated Flowering  Keumbi.
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Wang Long , Mai Yan-Xia , Zhang Yan-Chun , Luo Qian , Yang Hong-Quan  
The bHLH Transcription Factors MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 Are Required for Jasmonate- Mediated Inhibition of Flowering in Arabidopsis  Houping Wang, Yang Li,
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 361-371 (August 2014) Regulation of Active DNA Demethylation by an α-Crystallin Domain Protein in Arabidopsis  Weiqiang Qian, Daisuke Miki, Mingguang Lei, Xiaohong Zhu, Huiming Zhang, Yunhua Liu, Yan Li, Zhaobo Lang, Jing Wang, Kai Tang, Renyi Liu, Jian-Kang Zhu  Molecular Cell  Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 361-371 (August 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.008 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2014 55, 361-371DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Identification of idm2 Mutants, Their Genetic Interactions with ros1, rdr2, and nrpe1 Mutations, and Their Effects on DNA Methylation, Histone Modification, and Transcriptional Silencing (A) Analysis of DNA methylation level at the At1g26400 locus by Chop PCR. Because HhaI digestion is sensitive to CG DNA methylation, DNA hypermethylation results in increased levels of the PCR product. Undigested DNA is shown as a control. (B) Bisulfite sequencing data showing the effects of idm2 mutations on At1g26400 DNA methylation in different sequence contexts and genetic interactions with ros1, rdr2, or nrpe1. (C) Effect of idm1 and idm2 mutations on 35S-SUC2 transgene-mediated root growth suppression. Seedlings were grown on plates with MS medium plus 2% sucrose for 3 weeks before they were photographed. (D) Real-time PCR analysis of the expression levels of SUC2 and HPTII transgenes in the different genotypes. TUB8 was used as an internal control. Error bars represent standard error (n = 3). (E) ChIP assay of H3K4me2 and K3H9me2 in the wild-type, idm1-9, and idm2-3. Ten-day-old seedlings were used for ChIP assay with antibodies against H3K9me2 or H3K4me2. The ChIP signal was quantified relative to input DNA. The no-antibody precipitates served as negative control. Two biological replicates were performed, and very similar results were obtained. Standard errors were calculated from three technical repeats. (F) The DNA hypermethylation phenotype of idm2-1 plants is rescued by transgenic expression of wild-type IDM2 but not by expression of the D49E, G246D, or G260D mutant. Chop PCR results for At1g26400 are shown for two representative transgenic lines generated from each construct. See also Figures S1 and S4 and Tables S4 and S5. Molecular Cell 2014 55, 361-371DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Analysis of DMRs Identified in idm2 Mutant (A) The number of DMRs identified in idm2 and the overlap of hyper-DMRs between different mutant plants. (B) Composition of the hypermethylated loci in idm2-1, idm1-1, ros1-4, and rdd mutants. TE, transposable element. (C) Enrichment of small RNAs (sRNAs) in the 1,218 hypermethylated regions identified in idm2-1. Small RNA reads were generated from the wild-type and rdd mutant plants by Lister et al. (2008). Black dots indicate the sRNA densities from randomly selected regions in the genome, and red dots indicate the sRNA densities in the hypermethylated regions in idm2-1. Horizontal lines indicate the 99th percentile of sRNA density from 1,000 simulated runs. (D and E) Overlap of hyper-DMRs between idm2 and idm1 (D) and between idm2 and rdd (E). Boxplots represent methylation levels of each class of DMRs. See also Figure S2 and Tables S1 and S2. Molecular Cell 2014 55, 361-371DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Gene Expression Level in idm1 and idm2 Mutants (A) Expression of the hypermethylated genes or genes near DMRs in 2-week-old idm1-1, idm2-1, and ros1-4 seedlings. Error bars represent standard error (n = 3). (B) Overlap of differentially expressed genes between the different comparison groups. See also Figure S3 and Tables S3 and S4. Molecular Cell 2014 55, 361-371DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Protein-Protein Interactions between IDM2 and IDM1 (A) Yeast two-hybrid analysis of IDM1 and IDM2 interaction. AD, activating domain; BD, binding domain. (B) LCI assays showing that IDM1 can interact with IDM2 in Arabidopsis protoplasts. 1, IDM1-nLUC+IDM2-cLUC; 2, IDM1-nLUC+cLUC; 3, nLUC+IDM2-cLUC; 4, nLUC+cLUC. Three biological replicates were performed, and very similar results were obtained. Standard errors were calculated from three technical repeats. (C) Co-IP of IDM1 and IDM2 in tobacco leaves. MYC-tagged IDM2 and GFP-tagged IDM1 were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. Anti-GFP was used for immunoprecipitation (IP); anti-MYC and anti-GFP were used for immunoblotting. Input, total protein before immunoprecipitation. (D) The interaction between Flag-IDM2 and IDM1-HA as determined by co-IP. Transgenic plants expressing Flag-IDM2 or IDM1-HA under their native promoters and their F1 offspring were used for co-IP. Molecular Cell 2014 55, 361-371DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Subnuclear Localization of IDM2 and Its Colocalization with IDM1 (A) Detection of IDM2 (red) in the wild-type and idm2-1 mutant nuclei by immunostaining using anti-iDM2. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (B) Dual immunolocalization of IDM2 (red) and IDM1-HA (green). DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). The frequency of nuclei displaying each interphase pattern is shown on the right. Scale bars represent 10 μm. See also Figure S5. Molecular Cell 2014 55, 361-371DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Effect of idm2 Mutation on Histone Modification Marks H3K18ac and H3K23ac levels at the DMRs and 35S promoter and control regions were determined by ChIP on wild-type, idm1-9, and idm2-3 plants with anti-H3K18ac or anti-H3K23ac antibodies. The ChIP signal was quantified relative to input DNA. The no-antibody precipitates served as negative control. Two biological replicates were performed, and very similar results were obtained. Standard errors were calculated from three technical repeats. See also Figure S6 and Table S4. Molecular Cell 2014 55, 361-371DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions