Global Forest Carbon Budget (tons of C/y)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Carbon Farming Initiative and Agricultural Emissions This presentation was prepared by the University of Melbourne for the Regional Landcare Facilitator.
Advertisements

Effect of Climate Change on Canada’s Forests and Rural Communities Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture & Forestry Avrim Lazar President & CEO Forest.
Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
Trees and Climate Change. Global Warming the recent increase of the mean temperatures in the earth’s atmosphere and oceans which is predominantly caused.
Maine Forestry Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options Thomas D. Peterson PSU James E. Smith USFS Jack D. Kartez USM.
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
An Introduction to Carbon Modelling Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Quito, Ecuador March, 2004.
Bioenergy: GHG balances ‘Carbon lean’, not ‘carbon neutral’
World Forests Forests cover 30% of the world’s land surface.
Opportunities to Increase Carbon Sequestration Through Forestry Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Global Change Research Program Senate Agriculture.
Understanding the carbon footprint of wood and paper products Presented to: State of California, Department of General Services EPP Task Force PCRC Paper.
The LULUCF sector: land use, land-use change and forestry
Managing forests for carbon storage Bill Keeton Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont.
Carbon sequestration in China’s ecosystems, Jingyun Fang Department of Ecology Peking University Feb. 14, 2008.
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. USDA Forest Service GTR NE-343.
Carbon Sequestration Anjani Kumar CPSP218L Dudash
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change.
Stakeholder consultation on discussion document on GHG mitigation potential within the agriculture and forest sector Portlaoise 15 May 2015 Eugene Hendrick.
Climate Change and Forestry Allan L. Carroll, Ph.D. Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Pacific Forestry Centre Victoria, Canada Senior Research.
Carbon and forest management Robert Matthews Forest Research Biometrics, Surveys and Statistics Division Alice Holt Research Station, Farnham.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
Forest Inventory Methods and Carbon Analysis Linda S. Heath Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station In Support of the United.
Presentation Title Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of Adaptation Supporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action Forest Ecosystems:
Magnus Matisons Brussels 4 June Setting the scene- The forest-based sector contribution to growth of the bio based economy.
Wood Bioenergy Carbon Accounting – Beyond Carbon Neutrality Ken Skog, Project Leader USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin.
Global Emissions from the Agriculture and Forest Sectors: Status and Trends Indu K Murthy Indian Institute of Science.
Forest Carbon Budgets, with examples, mainly with a US temperate forest perspective Linda S. Heath USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station Durham,
Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Forest Carbon Accounting Approaches for Use in Regulatory and Financial Trading Schemes Biometrics Working Group.
A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies Q: What is Carbon Sequestration? A: Capture and Storage of Carbon in Sinks Terrestrial (forest, agriculture)
Carbon Sequestration in Farm and Forest Ecosystems Sarah Hines April 2009
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
FOREST SECTOR MITIGATION IN INDIA Ravindranath, Sudha & Sandhya Indian Institute of Science Bangalore.
Forestry Projects: Measurement and Monitoring Werner A. Kurz Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Victoria, BC, Canada Biological Sequestration.
Is Biomass Burning Worse than Coal? Kevin Bundy & Brian Nowicki Center for Biological Diversity
The Forest Resource in Iowa. Iowa’s Forest Cover   Iowa’s forests cover 8% of our landscape   87% of our 2,97,000 acres are owned by private landowners.
Gordon Smith April 28-29, 2009 Biological Sequestration through Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Identifying Challenges and Evaluating Potential Solutions Washington,
Deforestation Joe, Cohen, Harrison. Role of Consumers  Forests are cut down for money or to provide for families  Farmers cut forests to create space.
William S. Keeton University of Vermont, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources Towards a Unified Vision of Forest Carbon Management.
Inventory Approaches to Forest Baselines: MAV Bottomland Hardwoods Case Study James E. Smith and Linda S. Heath Northeastern Research Station Durham, NH.
Public Land, Timber Harvests and Climate Mitigation: Quantifying Carbon Sequestration Potential on U.S. Public Timberlands Brian C. Murray, Nicholas Institute,
Status: Criterion 5—Maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles Linda S. Heath James E. Smith USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research.
Carbon in United States Forests and Wood Products, : State-by-State Estimates Richard A. Birdsey George M. Lewis USDA Forest Service Global Change.
Casey McCabe Global Change: Biome Perspective. (Illustration by Nicolle Rager Fuller, National Science Foundation.)
What research results are policy relevant? Annette Freibauer.
Forest management, forest products & the climate.
DECC’s BEaC Model (Bioenergy Emissions and Counterfactual Model) Dr Anna Stephenson March 8 th, 2013.
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green 20 November 2003IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting -
The Cliff Notes on Biomass Fuels and Greenhouse Gas Levels Clean Air Task Force 18 Tremont Street Suite 530 Boston, MA Prepared for 2016 Northeast.
Tomas Lundmark SLU Sweden
Carbon Sequestration Akilah Martin Fall 2005.
2015 RPA Update: Forest Carbon Projections for the United States
Post 2035: Fossil Emissions and the Paris Agreement
Robin Matthews Climate Change Theme Leader Macaulay Institute
Tropical rainforest: carbon sink or carbon source?
Forest Management and the Expanding Global Forest Carbon Sink
The Human Component of the Global Carbon Cycle
Forestry Miller—Chapter 23.
Rangelands & Forestry.
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Forest Ecosystem and Management
Gary M Pierzynski, P.V.V. Prasad, C.W. Rice, B. Lynn, and R. Lollato
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Forestry Pp
Mårten Larsson Deputy Director General
Can managed forest land provide effective strategies for climate change mitigation ? - examples from Sweden IEA Bioenergy Canberra, March 26-30, 2001.
Global Forest Carbon Sequestration and Integrated Assessment
Massachusetts Forest Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study
The Carbon Cycle.
Modeling current and projected carbon storage in wood and paper
GLOBAL EFFECTS.
Presentation transcript:

Global Forest Carbon Budget (tons of C/y) Carbon sink or source (-) 2000-2007 Boreal Forests (like Canada, northern Alaska, and Russia) 551 million tons Temperate Forest (like much of the United States) 860 millon tons Tropical Intact (not heavily disturbed) 1.1 billon tons Total sink established forests 2.5 billon tons   Tropical forests that have been cut down but are now regrowing 1.9 billon tons Emissions from Tropical that have been cut down and not replated -3.1 billon tons Tropical land-use emission -1.2 billion tons Global forest sink 4.4 billion tons Global net forest sink (total carbon captured by forest minus the total carbon lost when forest are cut down and not replanted) 1.3 billion tons Pan et al. 2011 Science 333:988-993

Global Carbon Fluxes Pan et al. 2011 Science 333:988-993

U.S. Forest Carbon Balance- (0 is neutral- rising line represents carbon being released) 16.5 billion tons stored; 220 million tons per year 46 billion tons released, 196 million tons per year Fig. 4.The carbon balance of the U.S. forest sector shows that clearing for agriculture, pasture, development, and wood use released ∼42 000 Tg of carbon from 1700 to 1935, and recovered ∼15 000 Tg of carbon from 1935 to 2010. Adapted and reprinted from Birdsey et al. 2006, with permission from the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America. McKinley et al. 2011. Ecological Applications 21:1902–1924

Carbon storage in the USA Zhu, Zhiliang, and Reed, B.C., eds., 2012, Baseline and projected future carbon storage and greenhouse-gas fluxes in ecosystems of the Western United States: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1797, 192 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1797/.)

Carbon flux

USDA Forest Service. 2010. Carbon storage in US forests, by state, sub-region, and ownership group. Available online at www.fia.fs.fed.us/Forest%20Carbon/docs/Total%20Carbon%20storage%20in%20US%20Forests%2020101028.xls [Only forest land included,.}

PNW Old Growth Reserves Smithwick, Erica AH, et al. "Potential upper bounds of carbon stores in forests of the Pacific Northwest." Ecological Applications 12.5 (2002): 1303-1317.

PNW Old Growth Reserves Smithwick, Erica AH, et al. "Potential upper bounds of carbon stores in forests of the Pacific Northwest." Ecological Applications 12.5 (2002): 1303-1317.

Carbon accumulation with active forest management can increase C, but… Cumulative carbon (Mg/ha) 0 20 40 60 80 100 McKinley et al. 2011. Years

…declines and recovers when starting with Old Growth forest Cumulative carbon (Mg/ha) Carbon balance from two hypothetical forest management projects with different initial ecosystem carbon stocks. Cumulative carbon stocks in both ecosystems, carbon removed from forest for use in wood products (long [L]- and short-lived [S]), substitution, and biomass energy (bio-energy) are shown for two scenarios: (A) land that has been afforested and (B) a forest with high initial carbon stocks. Carbon stocks for trees, litter, and soils are net carbon stocks only. Both scenarios are harvested in 40-year intervals. This diagram assumes that all harvested biomass will be used and does not account for logging emissions. Gains in carbon sequestration occur in two ways; (1) increasing the average ecosystem carbon stock (panel A; tree biomass), and (2) accounting for carbon stored in wood products in use and landfills, as well as preventing the release of fossil fuel carbon (counted as stored carbon) via product substitution or biomass energy (panel A; landfill, short- and long-lived products, and bio-energy). However, carbon can be lost for some time (panel B) when forests with substantial carbon stocks are harvested (e.g., some old-growth forests) until carbon stocks can accrue via sequestration in landfills, products, and with substitution effects. (The figure is adapted from the 2007 IPCC report.) McKinley et al. 2011. Ecological Applications 21:1902–1924

Managing 2nd growth to increase carbon storage 0 60 120 180 Forest age (years) Carbon Storage Rate vs Total Storage Carbon Industrial Forestry Harvest Age Increase rotation length Reduce harvest intensity Leave snags and coarse woody debris Minimize soil disturbance Slide: Paul Fischer 1 Canadell and Raupach 2008. Science 320: 1456-7.

Harvest and carbon pools 0 60 120 180 Carbon Wood products Carbon with NO HARVEST Carbon with HARVEST But compared to no harvest, it is clear that we can do better. Forest age (years) Slide: Paul Fischer