Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Where to be careful when developing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Kirsty McCormack.

Advertisements

Manual Evaluation: Are we doing what we think we are doing?

Alignment and Quality 2/8/2014 Alignment and Quality 1 What is it? What do I need to look for?

Health and the Web: UK Experience Professor Sir Michael Rawlins Chairman, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence And Professor of Clinical.

Chronic disease self management – a systematic review of proactive telephone applications Carly Muller Dean Schillinger Division of General Internal Medicine.

BALANCING 2 AIM: To solve equations with variables on both sides.

Alcohol is a big problem 23% adults hazardous or harmful drinkers (7.1M) Consumption doubled in adolescents in past 10 yrs 3.6% alcohol dependent (1.1M)

Effective assessment for the degree in social work SWAP with JUC-SWEC Care Council for Wales Scottish Social Services Council Northern Ireland Social Care.

Telephone based self-management support for vascular conditions via non-healthcare professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis Dr Nicola Small,

What makes a good NIHR application? 9 February 2012 Professor Jonathan Michaels.

Introduction to the unit and mixed methods approaches to research Kerry Hood.

Evaluation Capacity Building Identifying and Addressing the Fields Needs.

Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop.

Research Design Service West Midlands RfPB Research Funding Application Workshop 28 th February 2014.

Pilot studies Karla Hemming The University of Birmingham.

Challenges in evaluating social interventions: would an RCT design have been the answer to all our problems? Lyndal Bond, Kathryn Skivington, Gerry McCartney,

Specialty Block B FC&H Module Year 4 Manchester Medical School Introduction to Public Health.

Making research and education WICKED. Aim Develop and evaluate a model of care to improve self-management in T1DM specifically for young people aged

1. Choosing outcomes and measures - for doing and using research James Lind Alliance Outcomes in clinical research – whose responsibility? 20 November.

Improving Quality of Trials through the MRC Network of Hubs for Trials Methodology Research Professor Lucinda (Cindy) Billingham Professor of Biostatistics.

Potential of Public Health Systematic Reviews to Impact on Primary Research Professor Laurence Moore September 2007.

Designing Influential Evaluations Session 5 Quality of Evidence Uganda Evaluation Week - Pre-Conference Workshop 19 th and 20 th May 2014.

Mixed methods in health services research: Pitfalls and pragmatism Robyn McDermott Mixed Methods Seminar JCU October 2014.

Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.

BALANCING EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY A NEW INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMME ADDRESSING THE ROLE OF VALUES IN HEALTH CARE Department of Primary Care and Public.

Clinical trials methodology group Simon Gates 9 February 2006.

“But WHAT did they actually do?” Poor reporting of interventions: a remediable barrier to research translation Associate Professor Tammy

ARQ part II data management Training pack 2: Monitoring drug abuse for policy and practice.

Campbell Collaboration Colloquium 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark The effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programmes Dr Sarah Miller Centre.

Evaluation of complex policy and care: more than methods Nicholas Mays Professor of Health Policy Department of Health Services Research & Policy Nuffield.

Dr Amanda Perry Centre for Criminal Justice Economics and Psychology, University of York.

Moving from Development to Efficacy & Intervention Fidelity Topics National Center for Special Education Research Grantee Meeting: June 28, 2010.

Research Designs for Complex Community Interventions for Childhood Obesity Prevention Robert W. Jeffery, Ph.D. Division of Epidemiology University of Minnesota.

18 th to 21 st June 2013 Primary Care Sciences Keele University RUNNING RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS For further enquiries contact Debbie Cooke Tel: +44(0)1782.

How qualitative research contributes to evaluation Professor Alicia O’Cathain ScHARR University of Sheffield 22 June 2015.

The use of Stepped Wedge cluster randomized trials: Systematic Review Dr Celia Taylor The University of Birmingham On behalf of my co-authors: Noreen Mdege,

Introduction to MAST Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

A cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies for obesity prevention Elizabeth Waters, Boyd Swinburn,

Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.

Structured consultation for prostate cancer patients

Quality Improvement at the Crossroads AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting Washington, DC - June 9, 2008.

Secondary Translation: Completing the process to Improving Health Daniel E. Ford, MD, MPH Vice Dean Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Introduction to Clinical.

Departments in Business Business Name 1 Business Name 2.

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Improving the health in persons with.

Knowledge Translation for Improving Health Masoud Solaymani-Dodaran MD MPH PhD FFPH CCT.

Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.

NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.

HTA Efficient Study Designs Peter Davidson Head of HTA at NETSCC.

1 Exotic Disease Response (EDR) Training Surveillance Processes – Overview.

Decoding the Evidence Myth: The Realities of Evidence Based Public Health.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 28: Disseminating Evidence: Reporting Research Findings.

©2016 MFMER | slide-1 Elementary School-based Obesity Intervention Utilizing an Educational Curriculum Natalie Gentile, MD PGY-2 Family Medicine Mayo Clinic.

admissions in residents in care homes.

Title Investigators and sites. Clinical Trial Proposal Presentation Template for open forum at the 2017 ASM.

ANODE Trial Overview V6.0 17/01/17.

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University

Front Line Innovation and Trials

Development and feasibility testing of a complex intervention

RUNNING RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS

MUSIC THERAPY INTERVENTION

Implementation Challenges of Wound Interdisciplinary Teams (WIT): A Community‐Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial.

Writing research and grant applications – from idea to submission

Intervention Development in Elderly Adults (IDEA)

Conducting Efficacy Trials

Surveillance. Public Health Approach Surveillance What is the Problem ? Problem Risk Factor Identification : What Is the Cause ? Intervention Evaluation.

Project Name: Country:

GACD Annual Scientific Meeting

How to apply successfully to the NIHR HTA Board?

Larrabee’s Quality of Nursing Care Theory

Mark Edberg, Ph. D. Associate Professor Dept

Presentation transcript:

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Where to be careful when developing and evaluating a complex intervention!! Experiences from presented and other projects in the field of primary health care

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Development 1. Identifying the evidence base 2. Identifying /developing theory 3. Modelling process and outcomes Feasibility/piloting 1. Teting procedures 2. Estimating recruitment 3. Sample size Evaluation 1. Effectiveness 2. Change process 3. Cost effectiveness Implementation 1. dissemination 2. Surveillance/monitoring 3. Long term follow up

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Development 1. Identifying the evidence base 2. Identifying /developing theory 3. Modelilng process and outcomes Feasibility/piloting 1. Testing procedures 2. Estimating recruitment 3. Sample size Evaluation 1. Effectiveness 2. Change process 3. Cost effectiveness Implementation 1. dissemination 2. Surveillance/monitoring 3. Long term follow up

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Development 1. Identifying the evidence base 2. Identifying /developing theory 3. Modelilng process and outcomes Feasibility/piloting 1. Testing procedures 2. Estimating recruitment 3. Sample size Evaluation 1. Effectiveness 2. Change process 3. Cost effectiveness Implementation 1. dissemination 2. Surveillance/monitoring 3. Long term follow up

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Evaluation, eksperimental designs Randomisation: robust, preventing selection bias Individually Cluster Stepped wedge Preference trials/prerandomisation N -of-1 design

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Evaluation, non - eksperimental designs when: Irreversible intervention Under the way Widespread use Effect is small Long time before effect Cost of study – justified?

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Development 1. Identifying the evidence base 2. Identifying /developing theory 3. Modelilng process and outcomes Feasibility/piloting 1. Testing procedures 2. Estimating recruitment 3. Sample size Evaluation 1. Effectiveness 2. Change process 3. Cost effectiveness Implementation 1. dissemination 2. Surveillance/monitoring 3. Long term follow up

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Development 1. Identifying the evidence base 2. Identifying /developing theory 3. Modelilng process and outcomes Feasibility/piloting 1. Testing procedures 2. Estimating recruitment 3. Sample size Evaluation 1. Effectiveness 2. Change process 3. Cost effectiveness Implementation 1. dissemination 2. Surveillance/monitoring 3. Long term follow up

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Development 1. Identifying the evidence base 2. Identifying /developing theory 3. Modelilng process and outcomes Feasibility/piloting 1. Testing procedures 2. Estimating recruitment 3. Sample size Evaluation 1. Effectiveness 2. Change process 3. Cost effectiveness Implementation 1. dissemination 2. Surveillance/monitoring 3. Long term follow up

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University MRC: Developing and evaluating complex intervention: new guidance

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Good questions to your project? 1.Have you conducted a systematic review 2.Who is the intervention aimed at? 3.Can you describe the intervention fully? 4.Have you done enough piloting 5.Effect sizes? Reporting: CONSORT, STROBE (obeservational), TREND (non- randomised), EQUATOR (health research)

Annelli Sandbæk MD, ph.d, Ass Professor School of Public Health, Departement of General Practice Aarhus University Workshop – Complex interventions Session - Room – 17.00