Alternative Germ Cell Death Pathway in Drosophila Involves HtrA2/Omi, Lysosomes, and a Caspase-9 Counterpart  Keren Yacobi-Sharon, Yuval Namdar, Eli Arama 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Distinct Mechanisms of Apoptosis-Induced Compensatory Proliferation in Proliferating and Differentiating Tissues in the Drosophila Eye  Yun Fan, Andreas.
Eva Decotto, Allan C. Spradling  Developmental Cell 
Tony DeFalco, Nicole Camara, Stéphanie Le Bras, Mark Van Doren 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
The let-7 microRNA Directs Vulval Development through a Single Target
Lacy J. Barton, Belinda S. Pinto, Lori L. Wallrath, Pamela K. Geyer 
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Dcr-1 Maintains Drosophila Ovarian Stem Cells
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Persistent Replicative Stress Alters Polycomb Phenotypes and Tissue Homeostasis in Drosophila melanogaster  Severine Landais, Cecilia D’Alterio, D. Leanne.
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Tissue Repair through Cell Competition and Compensatory Cellular Hypertrophy in Postmitotic Epithelia  Yoichiro Tamori, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
LET-418/Mi2 and SPR-5/LSD1 Cooperatively Prevent Somatic Reprogramming of C. elegans Germline Stem Cells  Stéphanie Käser-Pébernard, Fritz Müller, Chantal.
Monica Boyle, Chihunt Wong, Michael Rocha, D. Leanne Jones 
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
The Mouse Spo11 Gene Is Required for Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Dedifferentiating Spermatogonia Outcompete Somatic Stem Cells for Niche Occupancy in the Drosophila Testis  X. Rebecca Sheng, Crista M. Brawley, Erika.
Phf7 Controls Male Sex Determination in the Drosophila Germline
The let-7 microRNA Directs Vulval Development through a Single Target
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Regulation of Temporal Identity Transitions in Drosophila Neuroblasts
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Jacob Gonzalez, Hongying Qi, Na Liu, Haifan Lin  Cell Reports 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Katie S. Kindt, Gabriel Finch, Teresa Nicolson  Developmental Cell 
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders  Jennifer A. Lee, Claudia M.B. Carvalho, James.
Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal  Judith L. Leatherman,
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Karen G Hales, Margaret T Fuller  Cell 
Cell-Nonautonomous Regulation of C. elegans Germ Cell Death by kri-1
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Steven Z. DeLuca, Patrick H. O'Farrell  Developmental Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 14, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Florence Couteau, Monique Zetka  Developmental Cell 
The REF-1 Family of bHLH Transcription Factors Pattern C
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis  Phylis Hétié, Margaret de Cuevas, Erika.
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Sugar Receptors in Drosophila
F. Christian Bennett, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology 
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Alternative Germ Cell Death Pathway in Drosophila Involves HtrA2/Omi, Lysosomes, and a Caspase-9 Counterpart  Keren Yacobi-Sharon, Yuval Namdar, Eli Arama  Developmental Cell  Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 29-42 (April 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2013 25, 29-42DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Spontaneous GCD Is Associated with DNA Fragmentation but Not Effector Caspase Activation (A) Schematic representation of the Drosophila testis apex. At the very tip of the testis are the nondividing somatic hub cells (orange), which constitute a niche for the germline stem cells (GSC; blue). Asymmetric division of a GSC yields a stem cell and a gonialblast (dark purple). The latter then undergoes four mitotic divisions with incomplete cytokinesis producing interconnected 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-cell spermatogonial bundles called cysts (light purple), which, after an extensive growth phase, enter meiosis as primary spermatocytes. Germ cell cysts remain enveloped by a pair of somatic “cyst cells” (light blue), originating from cyst progenitor cells (CPC; green), throughout spermatogenesis. Note the illustrated dying eight-cell spermatogonial cyst (red). (B and C) Apical tips of wild-type testes stained to visualize the nuclei (DAPI; blue) and fragmented DNA (TUNEL; red). The insets present channel separations and enlargements of the squared areas. (D) A wild-type testis labeled as in (B) and additionally stained to visualize activated effector caspases (cCasp.3; green). IS, individualizing spermatids; WBs, waste bags. (E) A testis expressing a diap1 RNAi transgene in spermatogonial cells by the bam-Gal4 driver line was labeled as in (D). Dying cysts are either active caspase-positive but TUNEL-negative (early cell death stage; arrows) or TUNEL-positive with a faint active caspase signal (late stage; white arrowheads). A spontaneously dying spermatogonial cyst in a region excluded from the bam-Gal4 expression domain is indicated by a yellow arrowhead. Scale bars, 20 μm. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 29-42DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 GCD Proceeds in the Absence of the Effector Caspases and the Apoptosome but Involves Dronc (A and B) Testes from drice and dcp-1 homozygous mutants, respectively, were stained as in Figure 1B. Scale bars, 20 μm. (C) Quantification of GCD levels in the testes described in (A) and (B). The presented values are relative to wild-type. The number of counted testes (n) is indicated within each column. Error bars represent standard errors. p values of the level differences between wild-type and mutants are indicated above the bars. NS, nonsignificant. (D–F) Testes ectopically expressing either (D) GFP, (E) p35, or (F) Diap1 in the spermatogonial cells (using the nos-Gal4 driver; see also Figure S1B) were stained as in Figure 1B. (G) Quantification of GCD levels in the testes described in (D)–(F). All calculations were performed as in (C). (H and I) Testes from representative mutant allelic combinations of dronc and ark, respectively, were stained as in (A). (J) Quantification of GCD levels in mutant testes of the indicated phenotypes. All calculations were performed as in (C). Developmental Cell 2013 25, 29-42DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TEM Analysis of Spontaneously Dying Spermatogonial Cysts Electron micrographs of cross-sections through the apical tip of the Drosophila adult testes. Areas confined by white squares and marked by white letters were magnified and presented in separated micrographs with corresponding letters. Scale bars, 5 μm (A, D, and G); 0.5 μm (B, F, and H); 1 μm (C); 2 μm (E); and 0.2 μm (I). See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 29-42DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ROS Accumulation, High Lysosomal Activity, and Some Lysosomal Hydrolases Are Involved in GCD (A–C) Apical tips of wild-type testes stained with (A and B) Hochest or (C) DAPI to reveal the nuclei (blue) and either (A) DHE to detect ROS (red) or (B and C) LysoTracker to detect lysosomal activity (red). (C) To reveal the dying cysts, testes were also labeled with TUNEL (green). (B) A yellow circle outlines a dying cyst with visible packed nuclei (an early-mid GCD stage), whereas a white circle outlines a dying cyst with faint Hochest signal of the nuclei (an advanced GCD stage). (C) Arrowheads indicate two dying cysts at either early-mid GCD stage (the lower cyst) or advanced stage (the upper cyst). (D and E) Representative testes from the indicated genotypes were stained as in Figure 1B. (F) Quantification of GCD levels in testes from the indicated genotypes. All calculations were performed as in Figure 2C. Scale bars, 20 μm (A–E). See also Figure S3. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 29-42DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Mitochondrial Serine Protease HtrA2/Omi Is an Important Mediator of GCD (A) An in-scale diagram of the genomic organization of htrA2/omi (red arrow trapezoid) and other flanking genes (black arrow trapezoids) is highlighted in pink. The directions of the arrows correspond to the relative 5′-3′ directions of the genes. Chromosomal bands (gray) are indicated above. Green bars denote the deleted areas in the small deficiencies and the omiΔ1 mutant, whereas dashed gray lines depict their distal and proximal breakpoints. The genomic segments used in the “rescue” constructs are indicated by red bars. (B) A schematic structure of the Drosophila HtrA2/Omi protein. The relative locations of the different domains and the fly-TILL mutants are indicated. MTS, mitochondrial targeting sequence. (C) Quantification of GCD levels in testes from the indicated genotypes. All calculations were performed as in Figure 2C. (D and E) Representative testes from the indicated genotypes were stained as in Figure 1B. Scale bar, 20 μm. (F and G) Quantification of GCD levels in testes from the indicated genotypes. The presence of a specific “rescue” transgene is depicted in red letters. All calculations were performed as in Figure 2C. See also Figure S4. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 29-42DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 In Vivo Analyses of IBM-Deficient and Catalytically Inactive Forms of HtrA2/Omi (A) A schematic structure of the coding region in the HtrA2/Omi rescue constructs. The introduced mutations are denoted by red asterisks. (B) Representative testes from the indicated genotypes were stained as in Figure 1B. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) Quantification of GCD levels in testes from the indicated genotypes. “Rescue” transgenes are depicted in red letters. All calculations were performed as in Figure 2C. (D) Quantification of pupal progeny of male parents from the indicated genotypes mated to wild-type females. “Rescue” transgenes are depicted in red letters. The number of repeats (n) is indicated in the vicinity of each column. Error bars represent standard errors. p values of the level differences are indicated above the bars. NS, nonsignificant. (E) The omi “rescue” transgenes are expressed at similar levels. Transcriptional expression from the transgenes was confirmed by RT-PCR analyses on RNA from testes of the indicated genotypes. RT+Taq and Taq indicate reactions with or without reverse transcriptase, respectively. WT, wild-type cDNA; omitran, transgene cDNAs; omiIFD, omiDf1/IFD cDNA; omigen, omi genomic DNA. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 29-42DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison between the Models of GCD and Conventional Apoptosis Pathways in Drosophila (A) The diagram depicts the components involved in GCD. Solid arrows indicate proposed connections based on interpretation of the genetic data in this study, whereas dashed arrows describe possible interactions based on data from the literature. The asterisk signifies a proposed target for Dronc based on (Gyrd-Hansen et al., 2006). (B) A schematic model of the core apoptotic machinery in Drosophila. Major components and interactions are depicted by solid arrows (activation) or T-shapes (inhibition), whereas dashed lines or arrows signify less general components and interactions. See also Figure S5. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 29-42DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.02.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions