Kay Perry, Young Hwang, Frederic D. Bushman, Gregory D. Van Duyne 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Conservation of Structure and Mechanism between Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I and Site-Specific Recombinases  Chonghui Cheng, Paul Kussie, Nikola Pavletich,
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Structures of Mismatch Replication Errors Observed in a DNA Polymerase
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Crystal Structure of a Bacterial Topoisomerase IB in Complex with DNA Reveals a Secondary DNA Binding Site  Asmita Patel, Lyudmila Yakovleva, Stewart.
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Shane J. Caldwell, Yue Huang, Albert M. Berghuis  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structure of the Yeast Hst2 Protein Deacetylase in Ternary Complex with 2′-O-Acetyl ADP Ribose and Histone Peptide  Kehao Zhao, Xiaomei Chai, Ronen Marmorstein 
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
Structural Elements of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor–DNA Complex
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Structural Basis for Catalytic Activation of a Serine Recombinase
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Structural Basis for Specificity in the Poxvirus Topoisomerase
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Michael M. Brent, Ruchi Anand, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Insights from the Structure of a Smallpox Virus Topoisomerase-DNA Transition State Mimic  Kay Perry, Young Hwang, Frederic D. Bushman, Gregory D. Van Duyne  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 127-137 (January 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.10.020 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Variola Virus TopIB-DNA-Vanadate Complex (A) Overall structure of the complex. NTD, N-terminal domain; CTD, C-terminal domain. (B) Electron density within the active site following refinement. The density is from a σA-weighted 2Fo − Fc map contoured at 1.2σ. (C) Sequence of the DNA duplex used to form the vTopIB-DNA-vanadate complex with the core recognition/activation sequence shaded gray. The vanadate linkage is indicated by “v,” with covalent attachment of Tyr274 indicated. The numbering indicated is used throughout the text. In all panels, DNA downstream of the cleavage site is colored yellow and the vanadium linkage is highlighted in brown and red. Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, 3, 5, and 6 were produced using PyMOL (DeLano, 2002). Structure 2010 18, 127-137DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.020) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Downstream DNA Contacts (A) View of the DNA downstream of the cleavage site with interactions illustrated for α10a, α9, the amino-terminal domain, and the β7-β8 loop. The α5 and α10a helices are bound in adjacent major grooves flanking the cleavage site. (B) Schematic of vTopIB-DNA contacts downstream of the cleavage site. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds and solid lines indicate van der Waals contacts. The downstream DNA in (A) and (B) is colored yellow and includes part of an adjacent duplex related by crystallographic symmetry (see Figure S1). (C) Sequence alignment of seven poxvirus TopIBs, one bacterial TopIB, one human TopIB, and the two subunits of trypanosomal TopIB in the α9-α10 region. Secondary structure assignments are for variola virus TopIB. Protein sequence GenBank accession numbers are Var: variola (NP_042133); Swi: swinepox (NP_570234); Fow: fowlpox (NP_039106); Mol: Mollescum contagiosum (NP_044038); Ect: Ectromelia (NP_671606); Myx: Myxoma (NP_051788); Cro: crocodilepox; Dr: Deinococcus radiodurans (NP_294413); Hs: human (NP_003277); and LdL (AAF73185)/LdS (ABW86320): large and small subunits of Leishmania donovani, respectively. Conserved TopIB residues are shaded yellow and residues likely to be involved in downstream contacts in the small TopIB enzymes are shaded gray. Structure 2010 18, 127-137DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.020) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of Variola Virus TopIB and L. donovani TopIB Transition State Mimic Complexes The view orientations of the two complexes are identical with respect to the conserved active site residues. Protein regions that contact DNA downstream of the cleavage site are colored green. In (A), the DNA is bent by 35°–40°, resulting in a trajectory that facilitates interaction with the N terminus of α9. Note the different orientations of the α9 helix in the two complexes. The downstream DNA in (A) and (B) is colored yellow, and in (A) the downstream DNA includes part of an adjacent duplex related by crystallographic symmetry (see Figure S1). The ldTopIB-DNA complex PDB ID code is 2B9S. Structure 2010 18, 127-137DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.020) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Active Site of the vTopIB-DNA Transition State Mimic (A) Stereo diagram showing the five conserved active site residues and three water molecules most closely associated with the reaction center. The three water molecules and Lys167 form a chain linking Tyr274 and O5′ of the −1Ade residue. (B) Schematic of the active site showing all of the hydrogen-bonding interactions made by the residues in (A). Solvent molecules are indicated by red and gray circles. See Figure S2 for a comparison of active site hydrogen-bonding distances for the noncovalent, covalent, and transition state mimic structures. Structure 2010 18, 127-137DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.020) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Conformation of the −1 Sugar during TopIB Catalysis (A) The −1Ade sugar in the vTopIB-DNA-vanadate complex. The backbone torsion angle γ (the C3′-C4′-C5′-O5′ dihedral angle) adopts a trans configuration, placing O5′ in position for axial coordination of vanadium and in position for hydrogen bonding by Lys167 and Arg130. The sugar also adopts an RNA-like C3′-endo pucker. (B) The corresponding sugar in a precleavage complex of human TopIB (Y723F mutant) bound to DNA (PDB ID code 1A35). Here, the γ angle is close to the standard value of −60° and the sugar is C2′-endo. The phosphate has not yet rotated and O5′ is not in position for interaction with Lys532 and Arg488. Structure 2010 18, 127-137DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.020) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 A Role for Asp168 in Strand Ligation Asp168 makes short van der Waals or CH-O hydrogen-bonding contacts to the –1 and +2 sugars located on opposite faces of the minor groove. The β7-β8 loop is anchored to the upstream DNA via four distinct interactions involving the backbone and side chain of Asp168 and the side chain of Lys167. Lys167 and Asp168 in turn provide a docking surface for the −1 sugar, where interactions with the ribose ring and O5′ may promote a favorable conformation for efficient ligation. Asp168 contacts several ribose ring atoms with distances of <3.5 Å; the closest contacts are shown. Structure 2010 18, 127-137DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.020) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions