New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Next Generation Content Area Reading Professional Development (NGCARPD) Summer 2012 Using Common Core to Enhance your Instruction 1.
Advertisements

Making the Connection to Assessment. Three components: Common Core State Standards Excellent Matches to State Curriculum Essential Skills and Knowledge.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the.
ACTFL’s Alignment of the Standards with the Common Core
Shifting Gears! A Professional Development Session Designed to Support Turnkey Training on the Shifting Gears Initiatives Educator.
1 K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy
CCSS/SBAC Update Sara Shore 1. SBAC Pilot Test Feb 20- May 10 Volunteer window closes Jan BalancedPilothttps://
OSSE CSSS Educator Leader Institute Secondary English Language Arts July 31 st to Aug 3 rd, 2012 Day 1 Facilitated by Heidi Beeman.
A Look at the Future of Assessments - ELA Ron Bauman · January 29, 2014.
Reading and Writing and the Common Core Standards Jen Fiegen Laura Norris Eva Petersen.
2 From NECAP to the Common Core and New Assessments English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Fall 2010,
PARCC Grade- and Subject-Specific Performance Level Descriptors Presented to the PARCC Governing Board and Advisory Committee on College Readiness June.
The Synthesis Essay How assigning and teaching the art of synthesis will help general ed students on the PARCC.
TUSD Scoring Extended Writing Using the PARCC Rubric as Framework September 2014.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
PARCC ELA Evidence Tables September 25, Today’s Outcomes Identify how Evidence-Centered Design informs the PARCC Summative Assessment. Identify.
Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Instructional Shifts Activity 1.
English Language Arts in Illinois
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Area Teachers.
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: K-5 Teachers.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
PARCC WORKSHOP Preparing Students for the Call to be College and Career Ready.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
Welcome to Implementing the Common Core State Standards
Adapted from: PARCC Model Content Frameworks English Language Arts/Literacy October 2011.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
Launching the Common Core State Standards Embrace Initiative Presented by Brittany Austin Literacy Interventionist.
New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC Mathematics Summative Assessment March 2013.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
Maryland Assessment Group Conference Wednesday, October 22, 2014.
10/11/2015MSDE1 PARCC Assessment Update PARCC Assessment Update Day 3, Session 4.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
STANDARDS FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS & LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES, SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTS Taking a Closer Look Inside the Common Core 1.
ELA Educator Effectiveness Academy.Summer 2011.© Maryland State Department of Education Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts & Literacy.
Session 1: CCR Anchor Standards and Structure of the CCSS in ELA & Literacy ELA Educator Effectiveness Academy Summer 2011.© Maryland State Department.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
COMMON CORE OVERVIEW English Language Arts Content Area Specialists Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported.
2010 AZ English Language Arts Standards Southern Arizona Summer Institute 2011 Pima County Regional Support Center Claudia Gaxiola.
CCSS outlines what students are expected to learn in K-12 ELA (English language arts) and math in order to be college and career ready.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT/PSAT Key Changes.
College Career Ready Conference Today we will:  Unpack the PARCC Narrative and Analytical writing rubrics while comparing them to the standards.
What is the Common Core State Standards Initiative? A state-led effort to establish a single set of clear standards for ELA and math Informed by the best.
ELA – 11 & 12 Common Core Vs Kansas Standards. DOMAIN Standards For Literature (RL)
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
Module 4—Literacy Strands Arts Education. Learning Outcomes Participants will: explore the relationship between the new Essential Standards and the Common.
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
GCSE English Language 8700 GCSE English Literature 8702 A two year course focused on the development of skills in reading, writing and speaking and listening.
Results. Performance Level Descriptors (PLDs) Indicate what a typical student at each level should be able to demonstrate based on his/her command.
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
+ PARCC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Winston - Salem / Forsyth County Schools ELA Module Two: Writing.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
LANGUAGE ARTS - Specifics
Narrative Writing Grades 6-12
Mount Holly Township School District September 2016
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Your Standards TODAY’S FLOW MORNING: Standards & 1st Unit Curriculum
Common Core Vs Kansas Standards
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Presentation transcript:

New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment

What are Performance Level Descriptors? Performance Level Descriptors or PLDs describe what students at each performance level know and can do relative to grade-level or course content standards assessed.

Building on Work to Date In October 2012 PARCC established 5 performance levels Level 5: Students performing at this level demonstrate a distinguished command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the Common Core State Standards assessed at their grade level. Level 4: Students performing at this level demonstrate a solid command… Level 3: Students performing at this level demonstrate a moderate command… Level 2: Students performing at this level demonstrate a partial command… Level 1: Students performing at this level demonstrate a minimal command…

PARCCs Process in Developing Performance Level Descriptors PLD Grade Band Meetings Final Draft PLDs Information from meetings gathered and synthesis created English Language Arts Operational Working Group refined PLDs ELA OWG created charts that explained the three factors that determined the levels. ELA OWG created a cover page to accompany the PLDs

Claims for ELA/Literacy ELA/Literacy for Grades 3–11 On Track Master Claim/Reporting Category: Students are on track to college and career readiness in ELA/Literacy. Major Claim: Reading Complex Text Students read and comprehend a range of sufficiently complex texts independently. SC: Vocabulary Interpretation and Use (RL/RI.X.4 and L.X.4-6) Students use context to determine the meaning of words and phrases. SC: Reading Informational Text (RI.X.1-10) Students demonstrate comprehension and draw evidence from readings of grade-level, complex informational texts. SC: Reading Literature (RL.X.1-10) Students demonstrate comprehension and draw evidence from readings of grade-level, complex literary text. Major Claim: Writing Students write effectively when using and/or analyzing sources. SC: Written Expression (W.X.1-10) Students produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to the task, purpose, and audience. SC: Conventions and Knowledge of Language (L.X.1-3) Students demonstrate knowledge of conventions and other important elements of language. SC: Research (data taken from Research Simulation Task) Students build and present knowledge through integration, comparison, and synthesis of ideas

Three factors that determined the levels Three factors that determined the levels. (text complexity; range of accuracy; quality of evidence) Grade 11 LevelLevel of Text Complexity 1 Range of Accuracy 2 Quality of Evidence 3 5 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Accurate Explicit and inferential 4 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Mostly accurate Accurate Explicit and inferential 3 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Generally accurate Mostly accurate Accurate Explicit and inferential 2 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Inaccurate Minimally accurate Mostly accurate Explicit Explicit and inferential

LevelLevel of Text Complexity 1 Range of Accuracy 2 Quality of Evidence 3 5 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Accurate Explicit and inferential 4 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Mostly accurate Accurate Explicit and inferential 3 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Generally accurate Mostly accurate Accurate Explicit and inferential 2 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Inaccurate Minimally accurate Mostly accurate Explicit Explicit and inferential PARCCs Process in Developing Performance Level Descriptors Grade 11

LevelLevel of Text Complexity 1 Range of Accuracy 2 Quality of Evidence 3 5 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Accurate Explicit and inferential 4 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Mostly accurate Accurate Explicit and inferential 3 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Generally accurate Mostly accurate Accurate Explicit and inferential 2 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Inaccurate Minimally accurate Mostly accurate Explicit Explicit and inferential Grade 11 PARCCs Process in Developing Performance Level Descriptors

LevelLevel of Text Complexity 1 Range of Accuracy 2 Quality of Evidence 3 5 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Accurate Explicit and inferential 4 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Mostly accurate Accurate Explicit and inferential 3 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Generally accurate Mostly accurate Accurate Explicit and inferential 2 Very Complex Moderately Complex Readily Accessible Inaccurate Minimally accurate Mostly accurate Explicit Explicit and inferential Grade 11 PARCCs Process in Developing Performance Level Descriptors

Looking at the PLDs This column provides the level being described This row provides information about the patterns displayed by students in reading at this level This row provides information about the patterns displayed by students in writing at this level

Looking at the PLDs These columns provide the written expression, knowledge of language and conventions that students are expected to demonstrate These columns provide the reading and vocabulary skills and content that students are expected to demonstrate

Staying True to the CCSS PLD writers wanted to stay true to the CCSS and therefore the PLDs are representative of this effort

Standard 1 Always at Play Standard 1 Focused on a students ability to find text-based evidence for generalizations, conclusions, or inferences drawn

Capturing What Students Can Do PLDs capture how all students perform show understandings and skill development across the spectrum of standards and text complexity levels assessed

New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment