Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Advertisements

Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Ecm29 Fulfils Quality Control Functions in Proteasome Assembly
The UBA2 Domain Functions as an Intrinsic Stabilization Signal that Protects Rad23 from Proteasomal Degradation  Stijn Heessen, Maria G. Masucci, Nico.
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2008)
Takashi Kubota, Kohei Nishimura, Masato T. Kanemaki, Anne D. Donaldson 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Matthew D. Petroski, Raymond J. Deshaies  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (February 2017)
The TRAF6 Ubiquitin Ligase and TAK1 Kinase Mediate IKK Activation by BCL10 and MALT1 in T Lymphocytes  Lijun Sun, Li Deng, Chee-Kwee Ea, Zong-Ping Xia,
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
TopBP1 Controls BLM Protein Level to Maintain Genome Stability
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Regulation of Transcription by Ubiquitination without Proteolysis
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Cdc7-Dbf4 Phosphorylates MCM Proteins via a Docking Site-Mediated Mechanism to Promote S Phase Progression  Yi-Jun Sheu, Bruce Stillman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
The APC/C Subunit Mnd2/Apc15 Promotes Cdc20 Autoubiquitination and Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Inactivation  Scott A. Foster, David O. Morgan  Molecular.
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Ubiquitinated Proteins Activate the Proteasome by Binding to Usp14/Ubp6, which Causes 20S Gate Opening  Andreas Peth, Henrike C. Besche, Alfred L. Goldberg 
Sichen Shao, Ramanujan S. Hegde  Molecular Cell 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
The DEAD-Box Protein Ded1 Modulates Translation by the Formation and Resolution of an eIF4F-mRNA Complex  Angela Hilliker, Zhaofeng Gao, Eckhard Jankowsky,
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
SUMOylation of Psmd1 Controls Adrm1 Interaction with the Proteasome
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (December 2007)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
A Ubiquitin Replacement Strategy in Human Cells Reveals Distinct Mechanisms of IKK Activation by TNFα and IL-1β  Ming Xu, Brian Skaug, Wenwen Zeng, Zhijian.
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e7 (May 2017)
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (December 2015)
Multiubiquitin Chain Receptors Define a Layer of Substrate Selectivity in the Ubiquitin- Proteasome System  Rati Verma, Robert Oania, Johannes Graumann,
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Evaluation of a Diffusion-Driven Mechanism for Substrate Ubiquitination by the SCF- Cdc34 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex  Matthew D. Petroski, Gary Kleiger,
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Sebastian Rumpf, Stefan Jentsch  Molecular Cell 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
Adelina A. Davies, Andrea Neiss, Helle D. Ulrich  Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Vidhya Ramachandran, Khyati H. Shah, Paul K. Herman  Molecular Cell 
Modification by Single Ubiquitin Moieties Rather Than Polyubiquitination Is Sufficient for Proteasomal Processing of the p105 NF-κB Precursor  Yelena.
Sequential E2s Drive Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly on APC Targets
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages (June 2011)
E3-Independent Monoubiquitination of Ubiquitin-Binding Proteins
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Minoru Funakoshi, Robert J. Tomko, Hideki Kobayashi, Mark Hochstrasser 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 733-745 (June 2010) Monoubiquitination of RPN10 Regulates Substrate Recruitment to the Proteasome  Marta Isasa, Elijah J. Katz, Woong Kim, Verónica Yugo, Sheyla González, Donald S. Kirkpatrick, Timothy M. Thomson, Daniel Finley, Steven P. Gygi, Bernat Crosas  Molecular Cell  Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 733-745 (June 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.001 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Rpn10 Is Monoubiquitinated In Vivo (A) Logarithmically growing wild-type yeast cells (see strain list in Table S1) analyzed by western blotting using Rpn10 antibody. Time points were taken as shown. (B) Purified TAP-tagged Rpn10, analyzed by western blotting. Increasing amounts of fractions were visualized by short (left) and long film exposures. Bands a and b represent putative mono- and diubiquitinated Rpn10. Asterisk, Rpn10 breakdown product. (C) Native 6xHis-Ubiquitin conjugates eluted at different imidazole concentrations (lanes 1–7), analyzed by western blotting with Rpn10 antibody. The same purification and analysis procedure was performed using a hul5Δ strain (lanes 8–14). Immunoblots with antibodies against proteasome subunits Rpt1, α7, and Rpn12 are included. Asterisks, unspecific bands detected with Rpn10 antibody. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 733-745DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Monoubiquitination of Proteasomal Rpn10 Is Dynamically Regulated (A and B) Fraction UR8 (see the Supplemental Information and Figure S2A) was incubated without ATP (lanes 1–4), with 5 mM ATP (lanes 5–8) or with 5 mM ATP and purified proteasomes (lanes 10–13), at 30°C, and time points were taken. In (B), assays were performed using UR8 fraction and proteasomes from hul5Δ strains. (C) Total cell lysates from a wild-type strain were applied to a Superose 6 column. Fractions obtained were analyzed by western blotting of Rpn10, Rpn12, or α7 proteasome components. (D) Proteasomes purified in the presence of 5 mM ATP and 5 μM MG132 were analyzed by two dimensioned electrophoresis (isoelectrofocusing and 4%–12% gradient SDS-PAGE) followed by Rpn10 immunodetection. Asterisk, Rpn10 breakdown product. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 733-745DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Levels of Monoubiquitinated Rpn10 Are Controlled by Rsp5-Ubp2 Enzymatic System In Vivo (A) Wild-type, rsp5-1, ubp2Δ, and double rsp5-1 ubp2Δ strains, carrying GST-Rpn10 galactose-inducible plasmid (plasmids are listed in Table S2), were expressed and shifted to restrictive temperature. GST-Rpn10 was pulled down and analyzed by Rpn10 western blotting. Lanes 1–4, cultures grown at 28°C. Lanes 5–8, cultures grown at 35°C. Induction levels are shown in Figure S3B. (B) Monoubiquitinated Rpn10 from a ubp6Δ strain (see Figure S3E and the Experimental Procedures) was incubated with equimolar amounts of Ubp2, Ubp6, and Ubp6C118A. Reactions were analyzed by Rpn10 western blotting. (C) Total cell lysates from wild-type, ubp2Δ, and ubp6Δ strains were applied to a Superose 6 chromatography. Fractions that contain eluted proteasome were analyzed by Rpn10 western blotting. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 733-745DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Reconstitution of the Reaction of Rpn10 Monoubiquitination In Vitro (A) Recombinant Rsp5, Rpn10, Ubc4, ubiquitin, and E1 were incubated as indicated. Right lanes show a reaction in which Rpn10 input was doubled. Lower panel, longer exposures that show diubiquitinated Rpn10 (Rpn10-Ub2) more clearly. (B) Proteasomes (wild-type and Rpn10UIM) were incubated with Rsp5, E1, Ubc4, and ubiquitin. (C) Proteasomes (wild-type and Rpn10UIM) were incubated with a cell lysate fraction. An inhibitory effect of o-phenanthroline was observed when 1 mM final concentration of this compound was added to the reaction. Asterisk, Rpn10 breakdown product. (D and E) Scaled-up reactions of Rpn10 monoubiquitination in vitro, using wild-type (D) or methylated ubiquitin (E). Asterisk, unspecific band also observed in (A). (F) Autoubiquitinated Rsp5 using wild-type or methylated ubiquitin, from reactions similar to (D) and (E), respectively. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 733-745DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Analysis of Rpn10 Lysines Modified by Ubiquitin (A) Summary of mass spectrometry analysis of Rpn10. Left, relative abundance of the Gly-Gly peptides found. Right, scheme of Rpn10 protein including all lysines contained in the sequence. Modified lysines are shown in bold. (B–D) GST-Rpn10 K to R mutants including all Rpn10 lysines (oligos are listed in Table S3) were expressed under galactose induction. Pulled-down GST-Rpn10 forms were analyzed by Rpn10 western blotting. (E) Monoubiquitination reactions of Rpn10K84only mutant using wild-type and methylated ubiquitin. Asterisk, electrophoretic artifact shown by the mutant, observed also in nonincubated samples. Short and long exposures of the film are shown. (F) Ability of a set of Rpn10 mutants to rescue growth defect exhibited by rpn10Δrad23Δ yeast strain (see the Supplemental Information). Rpn10 forms were expressed at 22°C using a galactose-inducible vector, selected with a URA3 marker. Cells (3 × 104) were spotted in the first column, and 3/7 serial dilutions were made for the successive columns. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 733-745DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Monoubiquitinated Rpn10 Shows an Inactive UIM and Decreases the Proteolytic Activity of the Proteasome (A) Binding assay of Rpn10 and mUb-Rpn10 to a fraction of endogenous HIS-ubiquitin conjugates (see Figure S5A and the Supplemental Information) immobilized on Ni-NTA beads (lane 1). Liquid phase inputs include unmodified Rpn10, as a control (lane 3), and a monoubiquitination reaction sample (mUb reaction), which contains both unmodified Rpn10 and mUb-Rpn10 (Rpn10-Ub1) (lane 4). Bound material is shown in lanes 5 and 6. (B) Binding assay of Rpn10 and C-terminal ubiquitin fusions (Rpn10-Ub and Rpn10-UbI44A), immobilized in beads (lanes 1–4), to a fraction of endogenous HIS-ubiquitin conjugates (input, lane 5). Bound material was eluted and analyzed by HIS western blotting (lanes 6–9). (C) Binding assay of unmodified and mUb-Rpn10 (wild-type and K84only mutant), Rpn10-Ub, and Rpn10-UbI44A to unanchored polyubiquitin chains immobilized in beads (lane 1). Input and bound material are shown for each sample (lanes 3–12). A control of Rpn10 binding to empty beads is included in lane 2. A longer film exposure is shown for lanes 5–8. (D) Reaction of Rpn10 monoubiquitination in vitro using wild-type ubiquitin and I44A mutant. (E) Time course degradation assays in vitro with proteasomes deficient in Rpn10, equimolar amounts of Rpn10 forms, and ubiquitinated cyclin B. Points at indicated times were taken and analyzed by anti-cyclin B, Rpn10, and Rpn12 western blotting. (F) Rpn10-Ub binding to rpn10Δ proteasomes. GST-Rpn10, GST-Rpn10-Ub, and GST-Rpn10-UbI44A were immobilized to beads, and proteasomes were applied as the soluble phase. (G) Rescue of Rpn10 function by Rpn10-Ub forms, including Rpn10, Rpn10-Ub, and Rpn10-UbI44A expressed from a vector. The assay was performed as in Figure 5F. Levels of protein expression are shown in Figure S5D. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 733-745DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Monoubiquitination of Rpn10 Is Decreased under Certain Stress Conditions (A–G) Yeast cells (wild-type, rad23Δ, and ubp2Δ) were grown in YPD liquid media at the described conditions. Cadmium, 200 μM; EMS, 0.08%; NaCl, 500 mM. Samples were taken at indicated times and the number of cells normalized and analyzed by western blotting with Rpn10 antibody. Molecular Cell 2010 38, 733-745DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions