Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CEPC BoosterDesign CEPC Booster Design FCC Week 2015, March, 2015 Marriot Georgetown Hotel Huiping Geng Presented for Chuang Zhang.
Advertisements

CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Design and Performance Expectation of ALPHA accelerator S.Y. Lee, IU 2/26/ Introduction 2. Possible CIS re-build and parameters 3. Issues in the.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui IHEP , Beijing Sep 17 th, 08IMAC.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Preliminary results on simulation of fast-ion instability at 3 km LBNL damping ring 21 April 2005 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Eun-San Kim.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
1 BEPCII Overview C. Zhang for BEPC Team Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS BEPCII Overview C. Zhang for BEPC Team Institute of High Energy Physics,
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
The machine status and operating mechanism of BEPCII CAO, Jianshe Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS April 16, 2013 The 4th Accelerator.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
V.Shiltsev 1 Comments on What Kind of Test Facility(ies) the ILC Needs Vladimir Shiltsev/ Fermilab.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
PETRA III, Status and Upgrade
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Failure analysis at BEPCII
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Superconductivity in the BEPCII Performance
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
BINP Tau-Charm Project
Recent studies on BEPCII longitudinal impedance
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
CEPC Booster Design Progress (Low field)
The design of interaction region
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Design Study of the CEPC Booster
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Design of Interaction Region
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Parameter Optimization in Higgs Factories Beam intensity, beam-beam parameters, by*, bunch length, number of bunches, bunch charge and emittance.
Commissioning Issues of BEPCII
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Injection design of CEPC
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Welcome EPICS'02 2002 EPICS Seminar Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences 20-22 August, 2002

Introduction to BEPCII EPICS Seminar 2002 (August 20, 2002, IHEP) From BEPC to BEPCII Basic Design Key Technologies Budget and schedule Summary

(1) From BEPC to BEPCII Status of the BEPC Why BEPCII What is BEPCII

1.1 The Status of the BEPC

The Layout of BEPC storage ring

Main Parameters Beam Energy (E) 1.0 ~ 2.5 GeV Revolution frequency (fr) 1.247 MHz Lattice Type FODO + Low-b Insertions *x -function at IP (*x/ *y) 1.3/0.05 m Transverse Tune (x/y) 5.8/6.8 (Col. Mode) 8.72/4.75 (SR Mode) Natural Energy Spread (e) 2.64E 10-4 Momentum Com. Factor (p) 0.042 (Col. Mode) 0.016 (SR Mode) Hor. Natural Emittance (x0) 0.4@1.55 GeV, 0.076@2.2GeV(SR) mmmr RF Frequency (frf) 199.533 MHz Harmonic Number (h) 160 RF Voltage (Vrf) 0.6~1.6 MV Bunch Number (Nb) 1*1 (Col.), 60~80 (SR) Maximum Beam Current 50mA@1.55 GeV (Col.,) 130mA (SR) Luminosity 5 1030 cm-2 s-1 @1.55 GeV, 11031 cm-2 s-1 @1.89GeV

Statistics of 00-01 Operation Fault Start-up Injection 6% 4% 12% BSRF MD 26% 10% BES 42%

Daily J/y operation of BEPC Period Days Beam time (hrs.) J/y events Lmax(1030cm-2 s-1) t(hrs) 99-00 142 2323 24 M 4 8-10 00-01 110 1900 22 M 5 8-10

Physics results from BEPC/BES

BSRF dedicated operation 70 days with three times for about 300 users every year Imax=140 mA, ex0=76 nm, t=20~30 hrs., Ninj=2

Synchrotron radiation application with BSRF

2.1 Why BEPCII BEPC/BESI collected 9 106 J/y events in about two years; Upgraded BEPC/BESII obtained 5107 J/y events in two years; BEPC/BESI collected 4 106 y events; BEPC /BESII operated for y from Nov. 23, 2001 to March 13, 2002; With 1 106 a week, 1.4107 y was collected in 100 days; Nice physics results are expected; For our physics goal, 6 109 J/y 2109 y per year are expected  BEPCII/BESIII!

1.3 Luminosity Strategy of the BEPCII Multy-bunch kbmax~400, kb=1  93 Choose large ex & optimum param.: Ib=9.75mA, xy=0.04 Micro-b:by* =5cm  1.5 cm SC insertion quads Reduce impedance +SC RF sz =5cm  <1.5cm (LBEPCII/ LBEPC) D.R.=(5.5/1.5) 93  9.8/35=96 LBEPC=1.010 31 cm-2s-1  LBEPCII =110 33 cm-2s-1

(2) The Basic Design The double ring structure of BEPCII Design Goals and Main Parameters Lattice and Dynamic Aperture Beam Collective Effects Beam Lifetime & Average Luminosity

2.1 The double ring structure of BEPCII

Mock-up of the double ring installation There is no showstopper for the transportation, installation, mounting and dismount of the magnets. The existing monuments for survey and alignment will be covered by the inner ring magnets. New monuments will be fixed on the wall of the tunnel. The antechamber of the positron ring needs to be carefully designed to fit the crucial space between two rings; The cable system, the cooling-water system, the pressure-air system and others need to be rearranged.

Magnet girder and pre-alignment

2.2 Design Goals and Main Parameters

Main Parameters

2.3 Lattice and Dynamic Aperture

2.4 Single beam collective effects Bunch length and impedance Vrf = 1.5MV, Z/n|eff0.2, Ith = 37mA  Ib = 9.8mA, l ~ 1.3 cm Beam-cavity interaction (with KEKB SC cavities) Resistive wall x/y = 6.6/7.6, Nb = 99, Ib = 9.8mA,  = 4.3ms; Ion effects Electron cloud instability: Antechamber with TiN coating for e+ ring Bunch feedback:tL=5 ms, tT =2 ms  Single beam instabilities can be damped !

2.5 Beam-beam effects Head-on beam-beam effect: similar to BEPC  x=0.04 has been demonstrated Parasitic beam-beam effect  c=112 mrad Horizontal crossing angle c  (5.5-11)2 mrad (BEPCII), 2.32 mrad (CESR) 112 mrad (KEKB), 12.5 2 mrad (DAFNE) Beam-beam simulation for BEPCII with BBC code has shown that the beam-beam parameters and crossing angle of 11 mrad are acceptable.

2.5 Beam Lifetime and Average Luminosity Taking t =1.35 hrs., tf= 0.4 hr. and L0=11033 cm -2s-1, the optimized collision time is calculated as 1.0 hrs. and the maximum average luminosity is calculated as Lmax~ 0.51033 cm-2s-1. The top-off injection will further improve the average luminosity.

(3) Key Technologies Injector Upgrades 500 MHz SC RF System SC Micro-b Quads and IR Magnet System Power Supply System Injection Kickers Vacuum System Instrumentation and Feedback Control Upgrade

BEPCII will apply state of art technologies

3.1 Injector upgrading Basic requirement: Higher intensity: positron injection rate  50 mA/min.; Full energy injection with E=1.55 ~ 1.89 GeV; To enhance the current and energy of the electron beam bombarding the target and to reduce the beam spot; To design and produce a new positron source and to improve its focusing; To increase the repetition rate from present 12.5 Hz to 50 Hz. To consider multi-bunch injection (fRF/fLinac=7/40);

The measures to increase positron intensity

BEPCII Positron Source

3.2 500 MHz SC RF System Basic requirement Sufficient RF voltage for short bunches. Sufficient high RF power. Suppressing the instabilities related to RF system. Stable and reliable RF system

RF Cavity in BEPCII Tunnel

3.3 SC Micro-b Quads and IR

3.4 Magnets System New arc magnets

Two-in-one Quadrupole IQ1

Septum Bending magnet ISPB Magnetic length 0.6m Magnetic Field 0.4 T Theckness 10mm Aperture 11078mm2 Current 2100 A Current density 52.7 A/mm2

(5) Power Supplies System

3.6 Vacuum System Vacuum pressure The BEPCII poses two challenges to the vacuum system, one is vacuum pressure (Arcs: 810-9Torr, IR: 510-10Torr), other is the impedance. Vacuum pressure Electron Ring Positron Ring

Vacuum Chamber Design

3.6 Injection Kickers

3.7 Instrumentation and Feedback Beam Position Monitor Bunch Current Monitor Beam Feedback System Synchrotron Light Monitor IP beam position control ……

3.8 Control System BEPC BEPCII  WS console Ethernet PC subsystems VAX 4500 Injection Beam diagnostic Linac CAMAC PS, Vacuum, RF BEPCII 

(4) Budget and Schedule The budget of BEPCII project is estimated as 640 MRMB. It is scheduled to finish in 4 years.

(5) Summary BEPC has been well operated with many exciting HEP and SR results for 13 years since it was put into operation in 1989. BEPCII is proposed as micro-b plus multibunches with two rings and its design luminosity is order of magnitude higher than present BEPC in energy range of J/y, y  and y. Some key technologies need to be developed to achieve the goal of BEPC II. The international collaboration will be promoted in order to accomplish this challenging and exciting project on schedule and budget.

May the EPICS’02 be a Great Success !