Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Advertisements

Steven Fishbane, Jeffrey S. Berns, M.D.  Kidney International 
Central venous catheter outcomes in nocturnal hemodialysis
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Long-term evolution of cardiomyopathy in dialysis patients
Epoetin use and Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative hemoglobin targets in patients returning to dialysis with failed renal transplants  C.A. Solid,
Summary of KDIGO 2012 CKD Guideline: behind the scenes, need for guidance, and a framework for moving forward  Adeera Levin, Paul E. Stevens  Kidney International 
Anemia management in chronic kidney disease
Tuberculosis and tubulointerstitial nephritis: an intriguing puzzle
Red blood cell life span and ‘erythropoietin resistance’
Determinants of phosphorus mobilization during hemodialysis
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Is there a pharmacologic basis for combination renin axis blockade?
Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
George A. Kaysen, Burl R. Don
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
How to interpret the eGFR in patients with small body surface area
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
This Month in AJKD American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Gentamicin pharmacokinetics during slow daily home hemodialysis
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
The analysis of survival data: the Kaplan–Meier method
Charles R. Nolan, Wajeh Y. Qunibi  Kidney International 
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Body size and outcomes on peritoneal dialysis in the United States
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Blood pressure targets in hemodialysis patients
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Locking of tunneled hemodialysis catheters with gentamicin and heparin
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Recent experience with high-dose intravenous iron administration
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
The effect of fruits and vegetables on urinary stone risk factors
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Abdulla K. Salahudeen, Erwin H. Fleischmann, John D. Bower 
Alternate-day dialysis may be needed for hemodialysis patients
Juan M. Lopez-Gomez, Eduardo Verde, Rafael Perez-Garcia 
Randomized long-term evaluation of bicarbonate-buffered CAPD solution
Long-term evolution of cardiomyopathy in dialysis patients
Electrocardiographic abnormalities and uremic cardiomyopathy
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 1977)
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Hemoglobin variability in epoetin-treated hemodialysis patients
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Epoetin use and Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative hemoglobin targets in patients returning to dialysis with failed renal transplants  C.A. Solid,
Carmine Zoccali, Francesca Mallamaci  Kidney International 
The Danish Renal Biopsy Register
Volume 81, Issue 7, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (September 2006)
Changes to the End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program
James B. Young, Hans-Hellmut Neumayer, Robert D. Gordon 
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages (April 2006)
The cost of starting and maintaining a large home hemodialysis program
Central venous catheter outcomes in nocturnal hemodialysis
Intra-individual variability in serum hepcidin precludes its use as a marker of iron status in hemodialysis patients  Bradley A. Ford, Charles S. Eby,
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 1325-1335 (September 2000) Effect of hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients with asymptomatic cardiomyopathy  Robert N. Foley, Patrick S. Parfrey, Janet Morgan, Paul E. Barré, Patricia Campbell, Pierre Cartier, Douglas Coyle, Adrian Fine, Paul Handa, Iris Kingma, Cathy Y. Lau, Adeera Levin, David Mendelssohn, Norman Muirhead, Brendan Murphy, Richard K. Plante, Gerald Posen, George A. Wells  Kidney International  Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 1325-1335 (September 2000) DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00289.x Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Weekly hemoglobin levels (A) and epoetin α doses (B) in patients with concentric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. Symbols are: (○) mean hemoglobin levels in the low hemoglobin target group; (•) normal hemoglobin target group. The vertical bars are 95% confidence intervals. Kidney International 2000 58, 1325-1335DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00289.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Weekly hemoglobin levels (A) and epoetin α doses (B) in patients with LV dilation. Symbols are: (○) mean hemoglobin levels in the low hemoglobin target group; (•) normal hemoglobin target group. The vertical bars are 95% confidence intervals. Kidney International 2000 58, 1325-1335DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00289.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 (A) Patients with concentric LV hypertrophy. Cumulative frequency distribution of the change in LV mass index from baseline to 48 weeks in the low (solid lines) and high (dotted lines) target hemoglobin groups. The groups are similar in terms of central tendency (P = 0.35 by Mann–Whitney U-test) and distribution shape (P = 0.60 by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Z-test). (B) Patients with concentric LV hypertrophy. Change in LV mass index from baseline to 48 weeks on the Y axis plotted against mean hemoglobin levels achieved. Symbols are: (○) mean hemoglobin levels in the low hemoglobin target group; (•) normal hemoglobin target group. The correlation between the change in LV mass index and mean hemoglobin did not reach statistical significance (β coefficient -6.94 g/m2 per 1 g/dL increment in mean hemoglobin, 95% confidence interval -14.61 to 7.30 g/m2 per 1 g/dL, R = 0.24, P = 0.075). Kidney International 2000 58, 1325-1335DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00289.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 (A) Patients with concentric LV hypertrophy. Cumulative frequency distribution of the change in LV cavity volume index from baseline to 48 weeks in the low (solid lines) and high (dotted lines) target hemoglobin groups. The groups are similar in terms of central tendency (P = 0.13 by the Mann–Whitney U-test) but differ in terms of distribution shape (P = 0.036 by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Z-test). (B) Patients with concentric LV hypertrophy. Change in LV cavity volume index from baseline to 48 weeks on the Y axis plotted against mean hemoglobin levels achieved. Symbols are: mean hemoglobin levels in the low hemoglobin target group; (•) normal hemoglobin target group. The correlation between change in LV cavity volume index and mean hemoglobin was statistically significant (β coefficient -8.00 mL/m2 per 1 g/dL increment in mean hemoglobin, 95% confidence interval -13.91 to -2.09 mL/m2 per 1 g/dL, R = 0.34, P = 0.009). Kidney International 2000 58, 1325-1335DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00289.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 (A) Patients with LV dilation. Cumulative frequency distribution of the change in LV mass index from baseline to 48 weeks in the low (solid lines) and high (dotted lines) target groups. The groups are similar in terms of central tendency (P = 0.66 by Mann–Whitney U-test) and distribution shape (P = 0.93 by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Z-test). (B) Patients with LV dilation. Change in LV mass index from baseline to 48 weeks on the Y axis plotted against mean hemoglobin levels achieved. Symbols are: (○) mean hemoglobin levels in the low hemoglobin target group; (•) represent the normal hemoglobin target group. The correlation between the change in LV mass index and mean hemoglobin was not statistically significant (β coefficient 0.03 g/m2 per 1 g/dL increment in mean hemoglobin, 95% confidence interval -0.90 to 0.85 g/m2 per 1 g/dL, R = 0.01, P = 0.95). Kidney International 2000 58, 1325-1335DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00289.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 (A) Patients with LV dilation. Cumulative frequency distribution of the change in LV cavity volume index from baseline to 48 weeks in the low (solid lines) and high (dotted lines) target hemoglobin groups. The groups are similar in terms of central tendency (P = 0.45 by the Mann–Whitney U-test) and distribution shape (P = 0.26 by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Z-test). (B) Patients with LV dilation. Change in LV cavity volume index from baseline to 48 weeks on the Y axis plotted against mean hemoglobin levels achieved on the X axis. Symbols are: (○) mean hemoglobin levels in the low hemoglobin target group; (•) normal hemoglobin target group. The correlation between change in LV cavity volume index and mean hemoglobin is not statistically significant (β coefficient 0.46 mL/m2 per 1 g/dL increment in mean hemoglobin, 95% confidence interval -0.31 to 1.24 mL/m2 per 1 g/dL, R = 0.02, P = 0.24). Kidney International 2000 58, 1325-1335DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00289.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions