Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.

Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:

CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Requests for Decisions on Panel Membership and Revised Schedule CBP Partnership Management Board September 13,

© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.

Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.

Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.

Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.

Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.

Proposed Process for Chesapeake Bay Program Adaptive Management Using ChesapeakeStat… Enhanced Partnering, Leadership, and Management Goal Implementation.

Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.

© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.

Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.

GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.

CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee December 3, 2013.

CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Progress to Date and Forthcoming Issues CBP Management Board Briefing May 9, 2012 Meeting.

CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.

CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/1/13 for GIT 6 Review.

Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.

Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.

HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.

Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.

CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,

James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.

Policy Development Process Committee Report to the Community, April 2011 Lee Howard, Committee Chair.

C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.

CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/5/13 for MB Review 1.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.

Section 4.9 Review Report Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015.

NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.

Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.

Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.

Nicholas DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.

Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.

Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership Management Board Meeting 9/13/12 Carin Bisland.

Monday, March 07, 20161Chairing PARM Events Programme Approval, Review and Modification: The roles and responsibilities of the PARM Chair Peggy Cooke Head.

Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.

Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.

Chesapeake Bay Program Independent Evaluator – GIT 6 Review & Next Steps.

AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.

Update to Members Analysis Team Update on current activities for comment List of proposed new project ideas Opportunity for Members to suggest new projects.

Chesapeake Bay Program

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference

School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:

Regional preparatory process for Rio+20

One ODOT: Positioned for the Future

Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System (DRAFT) October 31, 2016 (DRAFT)

E.O Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration

The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next

Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System DRAFT August 29, 2016 DRAFT 12/4/2018 DRAFT.

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System

CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for

Accelerator Safety Workshop SLAC

What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?

Building a Sustainable Community Collaboration

North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperative

CBP Citizen Advisory Committee Briefing February 22, 2013 Meeting

Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015

Planning for Place.

CBP Principals’ Staff Committee Briefing May 14, 2012 Meeting

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Architecture

Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting

TIBC Budget Formulation Improvement Project

Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System

Citizens Advisory Committee Discussion & Program Update Dana Aunkst Director USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 22,2019 Baltimore, MD.

Bolton Community Homes

Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Presentation transcript:

Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership Management Board Meeting 9/13/12 Carin Bisland

Purpose Evaluate C2K and streamlining of commitments Ensure a set of shared priorities that fully represents the interests of the Partnership including consideration of emerging issues(e.g. climate change) Clarify governance (roles, organization, operations) Design efficient operational structure for collaboration Enable effective communication of Partnership’s refreshed goals, outcomes and accomplishments

Background On July 11, 2011 the EC agreed to use a four stage process as the path forward. At the same meeting, they agreed to use an adaptive management decision support framework. The draft workplan was developed using these two documents as source materials

Setting Goals and Outcomes Develop Decision Support Framework GITs use framework for at least one goal by March 31, 2012 Remaining GIT goals through Framework by end of 2012 MB discuss and provide feedback to GIT chairs the full array of draft goal beginning in Aug. 2012 Advisory Committees will provide advice through MB and PSC representation

Setting Goals and Outcomes (Cont) 6. PSC (or Action Team) will review new goals/outcomes, review advice from MB and ACs, assess commitments made through EC actions to determine if new Agreement is necessary (March/Apr 2013 retreat). 7. Depending on #6, EC announces adoption of goals /new agreement (2013 EC meeting)

COMMENTS?

Governance Develop survey for MB to initiate discussions on any necessary changes to the structure, operational functions and membership of the MB. GIT 6 will analyze results GIT Chairs for input (Sept. 20, 2012) MB for recommendations to PSC (Oct. 2012) PSC for action (Oct/Nov 2012) Check results of survey monkey

Governance (Cont) 3. GIT 6 will develop draft protocol for “including federal, state, and local partners in the development of the new Agreement” MB to recommend to PSC (Nov. 2012) PSC for approval (Jan/Feb 2013 mtg) Use protocol to determine goals/outcomes of Program and whether a new agreement is necessary (March/April 2013 retreat) FLCD on PSC for this meeting

Governance (Cont) Using decision-making body identified in protocol, CBP to “revisit the governance and operations of the Chesapeake Bay Program and Partnership . . . To clarify relationships between previous agreement signatories, other federal agencies, and headwater states, and to formalize the role and relationships with the FLC . . .” EC and FLC approve changes to governance (2013 EC meeting)

COMMENTS?

Discussion and Next Steps Changes needed to workplan? Dates Steps Recommend forwarding to PSC for approval?

Discussion of Goals Outcome of Discussion – Feedback to the GITs that will help them improve goal statements Questions to Guide Discussion – Are the goals SMART? (Specific Measurable Achievable, Results-oriented, Time-Bound) Are there any goals that give you concern? Are there specific goals that you need more information on? Is there anything missing that would keep the Program from achieving its mission?