Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comprehensive Analysis of Tissue-wide Gene Expression and Phenotype Data Reveals Tissues Affected in Rare Genetic Disorders  Ariel Feiglin, Bryce K. Allen,
Advertisements

M. Fu, G. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, B. Yu, F. Meng 
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (March 2016)
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Adam M. Corrigan, Jonathan R. Chubb  Current Biology 
Martin O'Neill, Wolfram Schultz  Neuron 
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages e7 (May 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Identification and Validation of Genetic Variants that Influence Transcription Factor and Cell Signaling Protein Levels  Ronald J. Hause, Amy L. Stark,
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Target-Specific Precision of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Combinatorial Microenvironments Impose a Continuum of Cellular Responses to a Single Pathway-Targeted Anti-cancer Compound  Chun-Han Lin, Tiina Jokela,
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks of Human Myeloid Differentiation
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Andrew D. Bosson, Jesse R. Zamudio, Phillip A. Sharp  Molecular Cell 
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Transcriptional Profiling of Quiescent Muscle Stem Cells In Vivo
Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Cell-type Phylogenetics and the Origin of Endometrial Stromal Cells
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Xiaomo Chen, Marc Zirnsak, Tirin Moore  Cell Reports 
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Alterations in mRNA 3′ UTR Isoform Abundance Accompany Gene Expression Changes in Human Huntington’s Disease Brains  Lindsay Romo, Ami Ashar-Patel, Edith.
Comprehensive Analysis of Tissue-wide Gene Expression and Phenotype Data Reveals Tissues Affected in Rare Genetic Disorders  Ariel Feiglin, Bryce K. Allen,
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (February 2018)
R.H. Brophy, B. Zhang, L. Cai, R.W. Wright, L.J. Sandell, M.F. Rai 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Haploinsufficiency at the Nkx3.1 locus
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (August 2002)
Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Maria S. Robles, Sean J. Humphrey, Matthias Mann  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (October 2018)
Population Responses to Contour Integration: Early Encoding of Discrete Elements and Late Perceptual Grouping  Ariel Gilad, Elhanan Meirovithz, Hamutal.
The Numerology of T Cell Functional Diversity
BATLAS: Deconvoluting Brown Adipose Tissue
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 380-389 (January 2016) Simultaneous Multiplexed Measurement of RNA and Proteins in Single Cells  Spyros Darmanis, Caroline Julie Gallant, Voichita Dana Marinescu, Mia Niklasson, Anna Segerman, Georgios Flamourakis, Simon Fredriksson, Erika Assarsson, Martin Lundberg, Sven Nelander, Bengt Westermark, Ulf Landegren  Cell Reports  Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 380-389 (January 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.021 Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2016 14, 380-389DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.021) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Approach and Validation (A) Illustration of the experimental approach. Single cells are isolated by FACS and lysed immediately. Cell lysates are split for subsequent protein and RNA analysis by PEA and gene-targeted TaqMan assays, respectively. (B) Standard curves of sorted 1,000, 100, and 10 U3035MG cells plus no cell control (blank) for select PEA assays. The circle and triangle data points represent biological replicates. The red horizontal bar denotes the mean background value, whereas the dashed lines are the mean ± 3 SD. y axis values represent extension control normalized Cq values. See also Figure S1. (C) Coefficient of variation analysis of n = 40 split U3035MG single cells, where both halves were analyzed with the same PEA single cell protein panel. The coefficient of variation of each assay is plotted as a function of the number cells, out of a total 40 cells, in which the assay generated a detectable signal cells (top left). The top right panel shows the correlation between the mean values for each protein assay, comparing cell half 1 and 2 for each cell. The bottom panel shows the correlation coefficients between each of the two lysate aliquots, calculated for each cell across all assays. Cell Reports 2016 14, 380-389DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.021) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Analysis of Agreement between Averages of Single Cells and a Bulk Population Sample and Single-Cell RNA-Protein Correlations (A) Plot of the delta values (6d Control – 6d BMP4) for the means from the single cells (x axis) or the population controls (n = 150 cells) (y axis) sorted at the same time as the single cells (Pearson’s r = 0.68). Gene products that disagree between the average single and bulk controls are in bold. (B) Correlation plots between RNA and protein levels for selected analytes in all single cells belonging to the 0-hr untreated (green), day-6 untreated (red), and day-6 BMP4-treated (yellow) populations. Distributions of protein and RNA levels are shown as ticks on the y and x axes respectively. See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2016 14, 380-389DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.021) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Analysis of BMP4 Response in Glioblastoma Patient Cell Line U3035MG (A) PCA (left) and gene vector (right) plots for PC1 and PC2 for day-6 untreated and BMP4-treated cells, using combined normalized RNA and protein data. For the PCA plot, values for each marker in individual cells are reflected on a scale from blue to red. The colors and numbers at the top of the heatmap correspond to subclusters identified through the hierarchical clustering analysis shown in (B) with subclusters 1 (orange) and 2 (green) encompassing the day-6 untreated cells and subclusters 3 (turquoise) and 4 (purple) belonging to the day-6 BMP4-treated cells. Subclusters 1 and 4 primarily contain proliferationhigh cells. For the vector plot, vectors illustrate the ten most significant variables, measured at the level of RNA (dashed vector lines) or protein (solid vector lines), correlating with each of the first two principal components. The vector lengths represent the extent of correlation to each of the components. (B) Hierarchical clustering and heatmap of factors significantly (p < 0.001) associated with PC1 and PC2 from the PCA analysis shown in (A). (C) Boxplots of select RNA or protein factors divided by subcluster. Subclusters are identified by colors as described in (A). The y axis represent normalized Cq values subtracted from the normalized mean background − 2∗SD of the mean background. See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2016 14, 380-389DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.021) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Distinction of Treated and Untreated Cells Using RNA or Protein Expression Data PCA plots of BMP4 treated (yellow) and untreated cells (brown) at day 6 using expression of the same 22 genes, measured at the level of RNA (A) or protein (B), illustrating the relative ability of protein and RNA analyses to correctly identify whether cells had been treated with BMP4 or not. Insets show receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves derived by performing linear discriminant analysis of the first two principal components. AUC, area under the curve. See also Figure S4 for analysis including more principal components. Cell Reports 2016 14, 380-389DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.021) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions