Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genetic testing for high-risk colon cancer patients1 William M. Grady Gastroenterology Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (May 2003) DOI: /S (03)
Advertisements

Overview and pathogenesis of celiac disease Martin F. Kagnoff Gastroenterology Volume 128, Issue 4, Pages S10-S18 (April 2005) DOI: /j.gastro
Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: A consensus statement by the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer  Francis.
Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up Study  Andreas Stang, MD, MPH, Thomas.
Volume 147, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Douglas K. Rex, MD  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Colorectal Cancers Found After a Complete Colonoscopy
Effect of chronic intake of NSAIDs and cyclooxygenase 2—selective inhibitors on esophageal cancer incidence  Marc Bardou, Alan N. Barkun, Joumana Ghosn,
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Five-Year Colon Surveillance After Screening Colonoscopy
Douglas K. Rex, MD  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Volume 144, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
James E. Everhart, Constance E. Ruhl  Gastroenterology 
Nadir Arber, Bernard Levin  Gastroenterology 
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (May 2006)
Public health impact of colonoscopy use on colorectal cancer mortality in Germany and the United States  Chen Chen, MSPH, Christian Stock, PhD, Michael.
The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and the Rome III Process
Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: A consensus statement by the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer  Francis.
Volume 147, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages e1 (September 2012)
Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer Resection Rates in the United States Since Widespread Screening by Colonoscopy  Parvathi A. Myer, Ajitha Mannalithara,
Short-Bowel Syndrome Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 155, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018)
Volume 152, Issue 5, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Recommendations on fecal immunochemical testing to screen for colorectal neoplasia: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal.
Volume 156, Issue 3, Pages (February 2019)
Volume 128, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Barriers to colonoscopy among New York City homeless
Quality improvement for the gastroenterology fellow
Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer  Douglas K. Rex,
The 75th Diamond Anniversary of Gastroenterology: 1943–2018
Endotherapy for GERD: angels and demons
Stephen J. Rulyak, David A. Lieberman, Edward H. Wagner, Margaret T
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 149, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 147, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Effect of chronic intake of NSAIDs and cyclooxygenase 2—selective inhibitors on esophageal cancer incidence  Marc Bardou, Alan N. Barkun, Joumana Ghosn,
Coffee and Colorectal Cancer: Grounds for Prevention?
Volume 155, Issue 5, Pages e3 (November 2018)
Tsutomu Mizoshita, Satoshi Tanida, Takashi Joh  Gastroenterology 
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, David Lieberman  Gastroenterology 
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Colorectal cancer at a young age
Heiko Pohl, Douglas J. Robertson 
Bedside Calibration Of Pulmonary Artery Catheters
Diagnostic Colonoscopy: The End Is Coming
The Dawning of a New Editorial Board for Gastroenterology
Richard J. Saad, William D. Chey  Gastroenterology 
Anna M. Duloy, MD, Tonya R. Kaltenbach, MD, MS, Rajesh N
Postcolonoscopy mortality: Bowel preparation to blame?
Use of diphenhydramine as an adjunctive sedative for colonoscopy in patients on chronic opioid therapy: a randomized controlled trial  Salman Nusrat,
Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Colorectal Cancers Found After a Complete Colonoscopy
Gregory G. Ginsberg, MD  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Gavin C. Harewood, MD, FRCPI, MSc  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (May 2010)
Projected National Impact of Colorectal Cancer Screening on Clinical and Economic Outcomes and Health Services Demand  Uri Ladabaum, Kenneth Song  Gastroenterology 
David S. Fefferman, Richard J. Farrell 
Inadequate colonoscopy preparation: Is it time to send out an SMS?
Clostridial aortitis and colon cancer
Endoscopic band ligation of colonic bleeding
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Multisociety sedation curriculum for gastrointestinal endoscopy
Enteral stents: from esophagus to colon
Yu–Xiao Yang, Sean Hennessy, James D. Lewis  Gastroenterology 
Public health impact of colonoscopy use on colorectal cancer mortality in Germany and the United States  Chen Chen, MSPH, Christian Stock, PhD, Michael.
Survival in patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening colonoscopy  Kilian Friedrich, MD, Ludwig Grüter, MD, Daniel Gotthardt, MD, PhD, Christoph.
Rapid intraluminal growth of a colorectal cancer observed by endoscopy
Michael Jones, Jason Bratten, Stephen McClave 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages 903-924 (October 2014) Optimizing Adequacy of Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer  David A. Johnson, Alan N. Barkun, Larry B. Cohen, Jason A. Dominitz, Tonya Kaltenbach, Myriam Martel, Douglas J. Robertson, C. Richard Boland, Frances M. Giardello, David A. Lieberman, Theodore R. Levin, Douglas K. Rex  Gastroenterology  Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages 903-924 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002 Copyright © 2014 American Gastroenterological Association, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Ottawa scale. The Ottawa bowel preparation quality scale use guide. (1) Part A of the scale is applied to each colon segment: right colon (Right), midcolon (Mid), and the rectosigmoid colon (Recto-Sigmoid). (2) The fluid quantity is a global value for the entire colon. (3) The score is calculated by adding the ratings of 0–4 for each colon segment and the fluid quantity rating of 0–2. (4) The scale has a range from 0 (perfect) to 14 (solid stool in each colon segment and lots of fluid; ie, a completely unprepared colon). (5) Before using the scale in a study or audit, observers need to perform a calibration exercise. Gastroenterology 2014 147, 903-924DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002) Copyright © 2014 American Gastroenterological Association, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions