Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
Ying Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Wanchen Shao, Jian-Kang Zhu, Juan Dong 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Fang Xu, Yu Ti Cheng, Paul Kapos, Yan Huang, Xin Li  Molecular Plant 
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages (October 2015)
A Receptor-like Cytoplasmic Kinase Phosphorylates the Host Target RIN4, Leading to the Activation of a Plant Innate Immune Receptor  Jun Liu, James Mitch.
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Phytochrome A Negatively Regulates the Shade Avoidance Response by Increasing Auxin/Indole Acidic Acid Protein Stability  Chuanwei Yang, Famin Xie, Yupei.
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Calnexin Controls the STAT3-Mediated Transcriptional Response to EGF
Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
Ying Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Wanchen Shao, Jian-Kang Zhu, Juan Dong 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Young-Hee Cho, Sang-Dong Yoo, Jen Sheen  Cell 
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 18, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages e4 (December 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 13, Pages (July 2007)
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Xiang Han, Hao Yu, Rongrong Yuan, Yan Yang, Fengying An, Genji Qin
HOS1 Facilitates the Phytochrome B-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Function during Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis  Ju-Heon Kim, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung,
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
BZR1 Interacts with HY5 to Mediate Brassinosteroid- and Light-Regulated Cotyledon Opening in Arabidopsis in Darkness  Qian-Feng Li, Jun-Xian He  Molecular.
Allele-Specific Suppression of a Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor Reveals a Physiological Role of UGGT in ER Quality Control  Hua Jin, Zhenyan Yan,
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
The CDG1 Kinase Mediates Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction from BRI1 Receptor Kinase to BSU1 Phosphatase and GSK3-like Kinase BIN2  Tae-Wuk Kim, Shenheng.
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Yang Cang-Jin , Zhang Chi , Lu Yang-Ning , Jin Jia-Qi , Wang Xue-Lu  
The Arabidopsis Homolog of the Mammalian OS-9 Protein Plays a Key Role in the Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation of Misfolded Receptor-Like.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
RRC1 Interacts with phyB and Colocalizes in Nuclear Photobodies.
MED25 and JAZ7 Compete to Interact with MYC2.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 825-834 (November 2011) Dual Role of BKI1 and 14-3-3 s in Brassinosteroid Signaling to Link Receptor with Transcription Factors  Haijiao Wang, Cangjin Yang, Chi Zhang, Niyan Wang, Dihong Lu, Jie Wang, Shanshan Zhang, Zhi-Xin Wang, Hong Ma, Xuelu Wang  Developmental Cell  Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 825-834 (November 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.018 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2011 21, 825-834DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.018) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Amino and Carboxyl Regions of BKI1 Have Distinct Functions (A and B) The phenotype of plants overexpressing the empty vector (V), the full-length BKI1-YFP (FL), the BKI1-N-YFP (N), and the BKI1-C-YFP (C) in the Col-0 (A) and bri1-301 (B) backgrounds. The lower panels show the corresponding protein levels. Ponceau-S Stained Rubisco large subunit serves as a loading control. (C–F) The expression levels of some BR-responsive genes in various BKI1-related transgenic plants, Col-0, and bri1-301. CPD (C), DWF4 (D), and Saur-AC1 (E) are in the Col-0 background. The seedlings were treated with 1.0 μM eBL for 1 hr. (F) The expression levels of CPD, DWF4, and Saur-AC1 in the bri1-301 background. All error bars indicate standard deviation (SD). Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the wild-type (p < 0.05); pounds indicate a significant difference from the eBL treated control (p < 0.05). See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 825-834DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.018) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cytosolical Localization of the Carboxyl Termini of BKI1 Enhances BR Signaling (A–I) The subcellular localization of BKI1-YFP (A–C), BKI1-N-YFP (D–F), and BKI1-C-YFP (G–I) before and after eBL treatment in Col-0 background. Scale bars, 20 μm. Seedlings were grown on 1/2 Murashige & Skoog (MS) medium for 4 days. (A), (D), and (G) were untreated; (B), (E), and (H) were treated with 1 μM eBL for 5 min; and (C), (F), and (I) were treated with 1 μM eBL for 10 min. See also Figure S2. (J) The phenotype of plants expressing BKI1-C fused to a nuclear localization signal (NLS) or a nonfunctional NLS (nls) in bri1-301 background. The T1 seedlings were grown under dim light for 14 days. (K) The accumulation of BES1 in the pooled larger plants and the pooled bri1-301-like plants was detected by western blotting with anti-BES1 antibody. Ponceau-S Stained Rubisco large subunit serves as a loading control. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 825-834DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.018) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The S270 and S274 Sites of BKI1 Play Essential Roles in BKI1 Dissociation from the Plasma Membrane (A) The phosphorylation status of BKI1-FLAG on Serine residues in seedlings with or without eBL treatment. Immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-FLAG agarose; immunoblotting with anti-pSer or anti-FLAG antibody. The seedlings were grown on 1/2 MS medium containing 1 μM BRZ220 and were treated with 5 μM eBL or mock (DMSO) for 1 hr. (B) The subcellular localization of BKI1S270/274A-GFP, BKI1S270A-YFP, and BKI1S274A-YFP proteins in Col-0 before and after 1 μM eBL treatment. The time of each treatment is indicated. Scale bars, 10 μm. (C) The phenotype of plants overexpressing BKI1S270/274A-GFP, BKI1S270A-YFP or BKI1S274A-YFP in Col-0 background. Their protein levels were detected by western blotting with anti-GFP antibody. (D) The BES1 accumulation status in the BKI1-YFP and BKI1S270/274A-GFP transgenic plants. Immunoblotting with anti-BES1 antibody shows levels of the phosphorylated BES1 (p-BES1) and the dephosphorylated BES1. The 14-old-day seedlings were treated with 1 μM eBL (+) or DMSO (−) for 1 hr. In (C) and (D), Ponceau-S Stained Rubisco large subunit serves as a loading control. (E) Phosphorylation assay of wild-type and mutated BKI1 by BRI1 kinase. An equal amount of recombinant proteins, as indicated by the Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining (bottom), was incubated with [γ-32P] ATP and separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography (top). See also Figure S3 and Table S2. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 825-834DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.018) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 eBL Treatment Enhances the Interaction of BKI1 with 14-3-3κ In Vitro and In Vivo (A) The interaction of BKI1 with 14-3-3λ and 14-3-3κ was detected by semi-in vivo pull-down assay. 14-3-3λ and 14-3-3κ fused with GST were expressed and purified from E. coli. Protein extracts from plants overexpressing BKI1-FLAG was used for pull-down assay. (B) The interaction between BKI1 and 14-3-3κ was tested by BiFC assay. The indicated constructs were transformed into leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana. Scale bars, 20 μm. (C) The interaction of BKI1-YFP with 14-3-3κ-FLAG was detected by Co-IP. The 14-3-3κ-FLAG was IPed with anti-FLAG agarose, and the Co-IPed BKI1-YFP was detected by immunoblotting with anti-GFP antibody. (D) Two known 14-3-3-binding sequences (mode I and mode II) are aligned against the BKI1 sequence. “X” presents any given amino acid. The phosphoserine residues are marked with bold font. (E) The interaction of BKI1S270A/274A with 14-3-3κ was detected with a semi-in vivo pull-down assay. (F) The in vivo interaction of BKI1S270A/274A with 14-3-3κ was detected by Co-IP. (G) The interaction of BKI1S270A and BKI1S274A with 14-3-3κ was detected by semi-in vivo pull-down assay. In (A), (C), and (F), the 14-day-old seedlings were treated with 5.0 μM eBL (+) or DMSO (−) for 1 hr. An equal amount of recombinant proteins were indicated by the Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining (bottom) in the semi-in vivo pull-down assay. See also Figure S4. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 825-834DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.018) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Overexpression of 14-3-3κ Can Release the Inhibitory Effect of BKI1 on Plant Growth (A) The interaction of BKI1-C-YFP with 14-3-3κ-FLAG was detected by Co-IP. (B) The phosphorylation assay of the truncated BKI1s by BRI1 kinase. An equal amount of recombinant protein, as indicated by the Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining (bottom), was incubated with [γ-32P] ATP and separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography (top). (C) The phenotype of the 14-3-3κ-FLAG overexpression lines in Col-0 background. The protein levels of 14-3-3κ-FLAG were detected by western blotting with anti-FLAG antibody. (D–F) The phenotype of plants overexpressing 14-3-3κ-FLAG with BKI1-YFP (D), BKI1S270/274A-GFP (E), or BKI1S270A-YFP (F). The expression levels of transgenes were detected by western blotting with anti-FLAG and anti-GFP antibody. (G) The subcellular localization of BKI1-YFP or BKI1S270A-YFP in the pavement cells of Nicotiana benthamiana. See also Figure S5. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 825-834DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.018) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Phosphorylated BKI1 Competes 14-3-3κ Away from BES1 (A) The in vivo interaction of 14-3-3κ-FLAG with BES1. The protein extracts from the 14-3-3κ-FLAG line were IPed with anti-FLAG agarose, and the resulting precipitates were detected by western blotting with anti-FLAG or anti-BES1 antibody. The 14-day-old seedlings were treated with DMSO (−) or 5.0 μM eBL (+) for 1 hr. (B) The level and phosphorylation status of BES1 in cytosolic (C) or nuclear (N) fractions from the BKI1-C overexpression lines. The western blotting with anti-BES1 antibody was used to detect BES1. Histone H2B was used as a nuclear marker. (C) The hypocotyl length of dark-grown seedlings on 1/2 MS medium containing different concentrations of BRZ220 for 4 days. The “FL-High” line is the commonly used BKI1-YFP overexpression line in our study. See also Figure S6. (D) The effect of phosphorylated BKI1 on the interaction of 14-3-3κ with BES1. The protein extracts from the 14-3-3κ-FLAG plants were IPed with anti-FLAG agarose. MBP fused BKI1 and BKI1S270/274A proteins (5 μg) were preincubated with BRI1 kinase (0.5 μg) with or without 10 mM ATP for 30 min, and then they were added to the IPed 14-3-3κ-FLAG products and incubated for 2 hr. The proteins bound with anti-FLAG agarose were eluted and detected by western blotting with anti-BES1 antibody. The inputs of MBP fused proteins and 14-3-3κ were detected by western blotting with anti-MBP and anti-FLAG antibody, respectively. The input of BES1 was determined by western blotting with anti-BES1 antibody. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 825-834DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.018) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 A Model of the BR Signal Transduction Pathway (A) In the absence of BRs, BKI1 proximal to the plasma membrane keeps BRI1 in an inactive state through their direct interaction; BIN2 phosphorylates BES1 and BZR1 and inhibits their DNA binding activity; 14-3-3 proteins keep the phosphorylated BES1/BZR1 in the cytoplasm. (B) BR binding to BRI1 activates BRI1 kinase, which promotes BKI1 phosphorylation. The phosphorylated BKI1 dissociates from plasma membrane and BRI1, and then binds to 14-3-3 proteins in cytosol to free BES1/BZR1. The released BES1/BZR1 accumulates in the nucleus, leading to BR-responsive gene expression. Stars represent the phosphorylation state. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 825-834DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.018) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions