Ascending aortopathy with bicuspid aortic valve: More, but not enough, evidence for the hemodynamic theory  William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD  The Journal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgical complications: Summary assessment of.
Advertisements

Max B. Mitchell, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Of mice and men and surgical transcatheter aortic valve insertion
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters  Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,
“Lead from the front”: Participative leadership
Long-term prognosis of ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis  Evaldas Girdauskas,
Replacement of the ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve disease: Where do we draw the line?  Thoralf M. Sundt, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
The days of future past  Neel K. Ranganath, MD, Aubrey C. Galloway, MD 
Jennifer Chung, MD, MSc, Maral Ouzounian, MD, PhD 
Personalized cardiac surgery: Can noninvasive flow imaging lead to individualized resection strategies for bicuspid aortopathy?  Nicholas D. Andersen,
Machine-learning phenotypic classification of bicuspid aortopathy: Did the mountain give birth to a mouse?  Jean Bachet, MD, FEBCTS  The Journal of Thoracic.
Centers for Disease Control “increased-risk” organ donor: Not so risky?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection on oral anticoagulants: Being the dispatcher of a 911 call  Ourania Preventza, MD, Arthur Bracey, MD  The Journal.
Form ever follows function
William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD 
Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: One size fits all?
Bigger The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement  Ole Lund, MD, PhD, Martin Bland,
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
The unintended consequences in clinical research
William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD 
Alessandro Della Corte, MD, PhD, Simon C. Body, MBChB, MPH, Anna M
The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology
Echocardiography underestimates the aortic root diameter in patients with bicuspid aortic valve, but short-axis imaging can help  Hector I. Michelena,
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients
Innovation and science: The future of valve design
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
Michele Gallo, MD, Gino Gerosa, MD 
Hans-Hinrich Sievers, MD 
Do we need a bibliometrician to know which way the wind is blowing?
A first start for lung transplantation?
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement: Both excellent therapies  J. James Edelman, MBBS(Hons), PhD, Vinod H. Thourani,
Get it right the first time
Torsten Doenst, MD, PhD, Markus Richter, MD 
Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005  Scott D. Barnett, PhD,
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD 
Guidelines should bother us, not comfort us
In search of the smoking gun in calcific aortic valve disease
Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve
A fate worse than death  Jennifer S. Lawton, MD 
The Ross procedure: Time to reevaluate the guidelines
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Commentary: Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A high standard of comparison for transcatheter aortic valve implantation  Aaron Martin, MD, Michael.
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Biomaterials for heart valve replacement: Conjectures and refutations
Prognosis and “granularity”: Building on staging foundations?
The Mitroflow aortic valve: A past, present, and future illuminated
Patrick T. Roughneen, MD, Grant T. Fankhauser, MD, Abe DeAnda, MD 
Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD 
Ralph S. Mosca, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta is free—for some
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Tissue valve, nitinol stent, or storage solution
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Permanent pacemaker insertion following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Not infrequent, not benign, and becoming predictable  Craig M. Jarrett,
Between a rock and a hard place
Bicuspid aortopathy: Seeing the forest for the trees
Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement  Todd M. Dewey,
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Why arch curvature affects arch resistance
Toward a more rational approach in treating type B aortic dissection
Evaluating the best approach to treatment of aortic stenosis: The jury is still out  Glen B. Taksler, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Respect the aorta The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
The evolution of cardiothoracic critical care
Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2
Descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: “Busted”
Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair is all about “location, location, location”  Kevin L. Greason, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Presentation transcript:

Ascending aortopathy with bicuspid aortic valve: More, but not enough, evidence for the hemodynamic theory  William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 153, Issue 1, Pages 6-7 (January 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.033 Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The research approach to BAVaortopathy: past and future. Up to a few years ago, research on BAVaortopathy interpreted clinical aspects (eg, rate of progression, relation with severity of valve dysfunction, risk of dissection) with the aim of drawing inferences on the pathogenesis, that is, alternatively supporting the hemodynamic or the genetic theory. Inconclusive results and increasing awareness of the phenotypic heterogeneity have led to an inversely oriented approach: the contribution of either pathogenetic factor is investigated to identify the respective potential prognostic value in the clinical setting. AVR, Aortic valve replacement; BAV, bicuspid aortic valve. Reprinted with permission.11 The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017 153, 6-7DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.033) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Research approach to bicuspid aortic valve. Reprinted with permission.11 The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017 153, 6-7DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.033) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions