AQ BTU Form – Process & Timeline 29th September 2009

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenters:- Steve Nunnington xoserve & Sallyann Blackett E.on Sallyann Blackett E.on Rolling AQ – A Straw Man.
Advertisements

12/10/20141 Project Nexus Workgroup Settlement Issues 15 th May 2012.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
AQ Appeals and the BTU form Chris Warner. 2 AQ Appeals and the BTU form  Presentation reflects NGD’s view of UNC regime as drafted and is intended to.
Data Logger/ Daily Meter Reading Processes. New Daily Metered Site  DM Service Provider receives a request from Gas Shipper for installation of daily.
UNC Urgent Modification Proposal 0275 Timeline.  Day 1  User raises APP Conquest Query with requested loads (BSSOQ, SOQ, SHQ) and provides warrant from.
Reasonable Endeavours Claims Distribution Workstream MOD231 16/12/08.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
CSEP Transportation Charges 11 th August Background Action NEX0604 from 18 th June PN UNC requested Xoserve to provide a presentation on how Supply.
UNC Urgent Modification Proposal 0275 Supplemental Analysis and Timeline.
AQ Amendment: Relevant UNC obligations and additional Validations Applied 27 May 2010.
Version /08/2008 The AQ calculation and validation process Compiled and delivered from the xoserve AQ Team for Review Group 209 Susan Prosser & Steve.
Xoserve sense checks & validation Reasonable Endeavours Claims.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
CSEPs Reconciliation “Read Window” proposal. 2 Background  I&C CSEPs (supply point AQ >73,200) are subject to reconciliation  IGTs are obliged to provide.
11 User Pays User Committee 12th November Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
1 UNC Modification 429 Customer Settlement Error Claims Process – Guidance Document.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2013/14 6 th February 2012.
11 User Pays User Committee 11th January Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
11 User Pays User Committee 16th February Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
ScottishPower, Energy Retail MOD 282 – Introduction of a process to manage Long Term Vacant Sites May 2010 Elaine Carr ScottishPower.
Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010.
Version /08/2008 The AQ calculation and validation process Compiled and delivered from the xoserve AQ Team for Review Group 209 Susan Prosser & Steve.
Impacts of Mod 244 Steve Nunnington xoserve. Background  96.5% of transportation charges based on capacity.  These are dependent on historical throughput.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
11 User Pays User Committee 10th August Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
CONFIDENTIAL - Mod Initial Business Rules © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
ScottishPower, Energy Retail Gas Long Term Vacant (LTV) Proposal February 2010 Karen Kennedy ScottishPower.
DCA timeline and ROM Overview 12 October Smart Metering Indicative Timeline Evaluation Service (EVS) 2528 received / Rough Order of Magnitude.
Rolling AQ – Initial Calculation
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Weekly Progress Update 3rd Aug 2018
CSEP NExA Update Marie Clark ScottishPower 28th September 2006.
Unique Sites End to End Process Walkthrough
Must Read Process Guide For Shippers
DM Elective Transfer Scenarios 26 February 2009
Modification th July 2008.
Distribution Workstream UNC Modification 0224 Draft UKLink Implementation Summary Responses 26th February 2009.
Weekly Progress Update 13 July 2018
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Weekly Progress Update 15 June 2018
Industry Shipperless & Unregistered Working Group
Demand Estimation - Non Loggable Meters: Issue
AQ Review and Revision Processes & Development of the Current Regime
CONFIDENTIAL - Review Group 272 © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc
Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.
SPA Processes for DM Sites
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup
Nexus Workgroup Winter Consumption and the influence on Winter Annual Ratio (WAR) Bands 8th January 2014.
Lessons Learnt UKLC - November 2015
Joint Theft Reporting Review (from meeting 1st March 2019)
Modification 421 – Updates and Benefits Case
DN Interruption Phase II
AQ Review System Calculation Overview
Development Work Group 0209 Straw Man Update
Review Group 208 / Development Modification Group 194
Nexus Workgroup Read Validation Scenarios
CONFIDENTIAL - Inter Shipper Discussion Process Initial Discussions © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved.
Actions Updates Action 0282/006 – Exclude from AQ process
Meter Reads.
COR3007: UNC MOD 450B – Monthly revision of erroneous SSP AQs outside the User AQ Review Period Implementation UK Link Committee – May 2014.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Annual Quantity (AQ) 45.
Development Work Group 194
Presentation transcript:

AQ BTU Form – Process & Timeline 29th September 2009

AQ BTU Form - Process BTU forms are used to change an AQ for an LSP (DM or NDM) BTU Forms used in AQ Process for: New Business Appeals D-7 to D+23 Business Days Manifest Error Appeals AQ is less than 50% of the AQ or greater than or equal to 200% of the AQ Instances where a change in AQ cannot be evidenced by consumption history BTU form is sent to the AQ Box Account and an accompanying AQ Appeal is sent via the standard route (but force referred) Evidence provided and validation undertaken by xoserve…

AQ BTU Form – Evidence & Validation Following information is required to be provided by Shipper Shippers responsibility to provide evidence to support that there has been: ‘change in consumers plant which results in a change in the basis on which gas is consumed’ (UNC G 1.6.13) e.g. removal or installation of equipment on site Evidence: Shipper statement on the BTU form regarding how the plant has changed on site Evidence can also include (but not mandatory): Appliance and total usage for each appliance Calculation of annual usage (i.e. by hours per day, days, weeks etc.) Shipper Estimate AQ on BTU form has to equal AQ on submitted Appeal xoserve will undertake some validation on the reads / consumption if BTU form indicates that there is some recent evidence

AQ BTU Form – Timescales Shipper submits BTU Form (email) and AQ Appeal (IX / files) xoserve will process within 5 days (usually sooner) Appeal reference is sent back to Shipper via IX / files Shipper re-confirms with Appeal Reference 7 days (no objection) 14 days (objection) AQ goes live NDM – SOQ will also change DM – SOQ will not change

AQ BTU Form – Volume of Requests September 2008 – 2009 44 requests received and accepted (33 NDM, 11 DM). 29 reduced the AQ 15 increased the AQ 74 requests rejected, for reasons: No meter attached Premises stated as vacant Meter Point Dead Lack of justification