Animal Cognition: An Insect's Sense of Time?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Circadian Timekeeping System of Drosophila Paul E. Hardin Current Biology Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages R714-R722 (September 2005) DOI: /j.cub
Advertisements

Merging of Long-Term Memories in an Insect
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages R447-R448 (June 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 21, Pages R894-R896 (November 2011)
Social Learning: The Importance of Copying Others
Animal Vision: Rats Watch the Sky
Eye position predicts what number you have in mind
Decision Making: How the Brain Weighs the Evidence
Generalizable Learning: Practice Makes Perfect — But at What?
Comparative Cognition: Action Imitation Using Episodic Memory
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Visual Categorization: When Categories Fall to Pieces
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Honeybee Vision: In Good Shape for Shape Recognition
Information considered harmful in animal communication
Chemosensory Ecology: Deceiving Drosophila
Sexual Selection: Roles Evolving
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Tzvi Ganel, Eran Chajut, Daniel Algom  Current Biology 
Spontaneous Metatool Use by New Caledonian Crows
Infant cognition Current Biology
Alternative Strategies: The Evolution of Switch Points
Phosphoinositide Function in Cytokinesis
Sleep: How Many Switches Does It Take To Turn Off the Lights?
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages R204-R206 (March 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages R111-R114 (February 2009)
Zoomusicology Current Biology
Sensory Biology: Bats Feel the Air Flow
American birds: Audubon was not the first
David M. Wilkinson, Euan G. Nisbet, Graeme D. Ruxton  Current Biology 
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Asymmetric tail-wagging responses by dogs to different emotive stimuli
Social Learning: Public Information in Insects
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Evolution: Mirror, Mirror in the Pond
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages R815-R817 (October 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages R262-R263 (March 2014)
Animal Behaviour: Emotion in Invertebrates?
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages R906-R910 (November 2006)
Pig cognition Current Biology
Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
Animal Behavior: Timing in the Wild
It’s all about the constraints
Episodic Memory in Nonhuman Animals
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages R483-R484 (July 2005)
The sound of change: visually-induced auditory synesthesia
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Patience Current Biology
Evidence of episodic-like memory in cuttlefish
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
ADF/Cofilin Current Biology
FOXO transcription factors
Neuronal Plasticity: How Do Neurons Know What To Do?
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages R565-R566 (August 2006)
Marine Biology: New Light on Growth in the Cold
Brain Stimulation: Feeling the Buzz
Volume 19, Issue 20, Pages R922-R923 (November 2009)
Drosophila Connectomics: Mapping the Larval Eye’s Mind
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
Closed Mitosis: A Timely Move before Separation
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages R555-R556 (July 2010)
Basal bodies Current Biology
Animal Personalities: The Advantage of Diversity
Neurodegeneration: Paying It Off with Sleep
Animal Cognition: Aesop's Fable Flies from Fiction to Fact
Circadian Biology: The Early Bird Catches the Morning Shift
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages R508-R510 (June 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Animal Cognition: An Insect's Sense of Time? Peter Skorupski, Lars Chittka  Current Biology  Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages R851-R853 (October 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.069 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Can bumblebees sense the passage of time? It has been long known that bees can correctly estimate the time of day by relying on their circadian clocks. As discussed in the text, a new article by Boisvert and Sherry [12] shows that bumblebees can also measure the duration of short intervals, potentially allowing them to predict the refill schedules of nectar-yielding flowers. Current Biology 2006 16, R851-R853DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.069) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Diagram of the fixed-interval procedure used by Boisvert and Sherry [12]. Once a bee was in the experimental chamber and had consumed an initial reward by extending its proboscis through a hole in the wall, the interval timer was switched on (FI, upward deflection) and illumination of the chamber (light) served to indicate that timing was to begin. Any proboscis extensions (response) made by the bee during the timed interval had no effect, but the first response following the end of the interval triggered delivery of a sucrose reward and also switched off the light. After a delay of 4 seconds to allow reward consumption, the next trial in the session was initiated by switching the light and interval timer on again. A session consisted of 20 trials. Different experimental groups received either long and short intervals in separate sessions, or long and short intervals (for example 12 and 36 seconds) randomly intermixed , to test the bees' concurrent timing ability. Current Biology 2006 16, R851-R853DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.069) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions