LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Text-Dependent Questions
Advertisements

Common Core State Standard: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Literacy Block Others Parts of the Day 90 Min. Reading Block
Teaching Academic Writing is like Making Biscuits Nancy Mullins ESL/Bilingual Programs Director Maine Department of Education January 26, 2012.
Creating CCSS Literacy Lessons in Science
Leon County Schools Next Generation Content Area Reading Professional Development (NGCARPD) Summer 2012 Using Common Core to Enhance your Instruction 1.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Addressing Common Core Standards Using
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Informational Text Audience: K-5 Teachers Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert Daiber.
Common Core Planning – Deep Dive into Literacy
Shifting Gears! A Professional Development Session Designed to Support Turnkey Training on the Shifting Gears Initiatives Educator.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 5: Academically Productive Talk Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and.
Copyright ©2011 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 3.
Session 3: Text Complexity Audience: K – 5 Teachers.
Speaking and Listening Instruction: Identifying and Using Effective Approaches to Facilitating Classroom Discussions December 9, 2014 Katanna Conley Michelle.
CA 2012 ELD Standards Appendix B
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Let’s Get to the Core Presented by: Benjamin Joseph Media Specialist
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 1.Complexity: Regular practice with complex text and its academic language. 2.Evidence:
Amy Painter 3 rd Grade Teacher Chesnee Elementary School.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Science Research Simulation Task Science High School Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Text-Dependent Analysis Session 1
Text Complexi ty in the Common Core Classroo m Patricia Coldren Lee County Schools k 12. nc. us.
Text Complexity and The KY Core Academic Standards for ELA and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science & Technical Subjects Carole Mullins Eng/LA Regional.
ELA Coordinators Meeting: Close Reading and Text Complexity Tamra Gacek October, 2012 Literacy and Early Learning Unit Office of Teacher Effectiveness.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
Unit 2 Selecting Texts Worth Reading Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Bridge to Practice Reflection As a review from the last PLC session, discuss your.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Common Core State Standards. Instructional Shifts Implementation of the Common Core State Standards College & Career Ready Students Data.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Bridge to Practice Reflection As a review from the last PLC session, discuss your.
Unbridled Learning Next Steps in the Content Leadership Networks.
November 18 th, 2014 ELA Review and Adoption Committee.
Text Complexity and the Common Core Standards. Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction (text complexity) Reading, writing, and speaking grounded.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 3: Text Complexity Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching and Learning.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Puget Sound ESD December
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
ELD Transition Sessions
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
1 An Overview of the 6 Shifts in ELA Literacy.
College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Montana K-12 Content Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Text Complexity.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS MODULE 4 FEBRUARY 2013 Reading Common Core Focus: Text Complexity.
Got Citizenship? September 12, 2013 Common Core: Close Reading.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh The CCSS & Close Reading 1.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Sequenced, Text-Based Questions 1.
Close Reading. AGENDA Demands of complex text on the reader Close reading tools for comprehending complex text Question and answer opportunities with.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 2: Engaging in Rigorous CTE Lessons Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching.
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
Understanding the Lexile Stretch and Its Rationale Text Complexity.
Introduction to the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool (IMET): ELA
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
Participants will:  Become more familiar with Disciplinary Literacy  Identify the importance of text complexity in disciplinary literacy.  Identify.
D 4 Understanding the Common Core State Standards & Assessment Katie McKnight, Ph.D.
Winn Parish September 2013 LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE.
Three Instructional Shifts
Common Core State Standards
Presentation transcript:

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education English Language Arts Grades 4-5 Module 4 Complex Texts & Sequencing 1

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Module 4: Goals Deepen understanding of what makes texts complex as well as why and how we should read complex texts with students by: discussing pages from Appendix A of the CCSS. research about writing in ELA. the CCSS perspective of text types. analyzing and assessing the complexity of informational texts. designing culminating assessments and writing assignments. Deepen understanding about how to sequence a set of complex texts for a coherent unit of instruction. 2

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Rigorous ELA Teaching and Learning TextTalkTask 3

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Review of Key Shifts in ELA/Literacy CCSS 1.Complexity: Regular practice with complex text and its academic language. 2.Evidence: Reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. 3.Knowledge: Building knowledge through content- rich nonfiction. *Excerpted from A Strong State Role in Common Core State Standards Implementation: Rubric and Self-Assessment Tool, p. 6, Table 1, Key Instructional Shifts of the Common Core State Standards, by the Partnership of Readiness for College and Careers Transition & Implementation Institute, 2012, Washington, DC: Achieve. 4 Key Shifts in ELA & Literacy (blue book, tab 1, purple)

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Text Complexity and the CCSS Appendix A 5

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Text Complexity and the CCSS You should have already read Appendix A and answered the questions below. In whole group discuss these questions: What are some of the reasons that reading complex text is important, necessary? Why is there a specific focus on Tier 2 vocabulary? What is the relationship between Tier 2 vocabulary and text complexity? 6

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh A Three-Part Model for Measuring Text Complexity 7

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Word length Word frequency Word difficulty Sentence length Text length Text cohesion 8 Part 1: Quantitative Measures Resource: Text Complexity (white book, blue, p. 93)

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Recommended Quantitative Ranges 9

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 10 Purpose/Meaning Text Structure Organization of Main Ideas Text Features Use of Graphics Language Features Conventionality Vocabulary Sentence Structure Knowledge Demands Subject Matter Knowledge Intertextuality

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 11 Part 3: Reader and Text Considerations Motivation Knowledge and experience Purpose for reading Complexity of task assigned regarding text Complexity of questions asked regarding text

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Text Complexity Analysis Tool

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Central Drivers Part I: Sequenced Complex Texts, Overarching Questions, and CCSS 13

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Central Drivers of Instruction Complex Texts Over- arching Questions Culminating Assessment CCSS 14

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh GRADE 5 15 Central Drivers: OPINIONS ON SPACE EXPLORATION Overarching Questions: What are the benefits and costs of space exploration according to these authors? What methods do writers use to build and support their opinions? Introduction to Unit Culminating Assignment Space Exploration is Worth the Cost Not in Our LifetimeTEXT Faaaaaa A Brief History: Space Exploration by AERO Timeline of Space Exploration Events Our Future in Space: Space Exploration and Travel by Peter W. WallerTEXT Benefits of Space Exploration by Tega Jessa Video: SpaceX Boldly Looks to Blast Millions of People to Mars from PBS NewsHourTEXT Write an opinion piece in which you analyze the benefits and costs of an aspect of space exploration based on information from at least three of the unit sources. Develop your point of view by stating your opinion on whether the costs outweigh the benefits or the benefits outweigh the costs. Include reasons and evidence that are grouped and sequenced to support your purpose. A One-Way Ticket to Mars by Lawrence M. KraussTEXT Key CCSS: RI.5.1, 5, 6, 8, 9; W.5.1

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Central Drivers of Instruction 16 Overarching Questions CCSS Culminating Assessment Complex Texts

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Questions for Sequencing Texts How will the texts be accessed by learners? How will the ideas of one text be used to understand ideas in other texts? How will the structure of one text be used to understand the structure of other texts? How will the texts be used as models of writing? What ideas from the texts will be revisited and set up to prompt retrospective work? 17

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Sequencing Complex Texts Content is easier to grasp Content is more difficult to grasp Content is more relevant to students lives and experiences Content is less relevant to students lives and experiences Language and/or structure is less complex Language and/or structure is more complex Text provides key background knowledge on topic Text requires key background knowledge 18

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Rules of Thumb for the First Text in a Unit Placing a text first in the unit sequence might be because it: –is less difficult to read than later ones and thus makes studentscomprehension easier at first. –is closer to students life experiences. –provides easier access to the overarching questions that will drive the work of the unit. –provides a more accessible point of view for the reader. –provides a model of the genre or model of the culminating assessment. 19

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Central Drivers of Instruction 20 Overarching Questions CCSS Culminating Assessment Complex Texts

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Overarching Questions Overarching questions present the big ideas/inquiries of an instructional unit. These text-based questions reach across and connect all of the texts under study. Each text allows students to deepen their responses to the overarching questions. Rules of Thumb: Have a limited number of overarching questions. Have one or two that relate to the big ideas in the texts. Have one or two that relate to the assessment task(s). 21

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 22 Tips for Designing Overarching Questions Questions to ask yourself: What two to four questions reach across all the texts in the unit? What questions align to key CCSS prompted by the set of texts? What questions will generate enthusiasm and sustain prolonged inquiry? What questions facilitate students being able to generate new knowledge based on the texts in the unit?

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 23 Sample Overarching Questions Grade 10 – The Ebola Enigma What are the unanswered questions about Ebola? What does it mean for findings to be warranted? What is the relationship between findings and evidence? What makes an argument effective? Grade 9 – Argument & Methods How do three different leaders across time imagine solutions to reach racial equality? What methods do these speakers use to build and support their arguments? Grade 7 – Modern Issues About Food What are these authors concerns about what we should eat? How are their arguments similar? How are they different? How compelling are the authors arguments in these texts? What makes them compelling? What are the characteristics of an effective explanatory essay? Grade 5 – Space Exploration What are the benefits and costs of space exploration according to these authors? What methods do writers use to build and support their opinions?

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 24 Develop Central Drivers of Unit Working in pairs/trios, develop three of the central drivers for a unit using the set of texts we assessed for complexity: Develop Overarching Questions. Determine the sequence of the texts. Share your groups overarching questions.

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Central Drivers Part II: Culminating Assessments and Writing Assignments 25

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Central Drivers of Instruction 26 Overarching Questions CCSS Culminating Assessment Complex Texts

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 27 Culminating Assessment Is a summative assessment. Is related to the units overarching questions, texts, and key standards. Provides a guide for the work in the unit. Provides evidence of student understanding and proficiency of the identified CCSS and learning goals. Allows for the construction of new knowledge or an extension of their thinking rather than a regurgitation of what students learned in the unit.

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 28 Culminating Assessment Culminating assessments across a year should require a variety of writing genres & modes. Once youve decided on a culminating assessment, make a list of what students need to know & be able to do to be successful. Design the unit with that as your guide (backward mapping). Unit texts should be able to support much of what students need to know and be able to do. Develop the culminating assessment with the rubric in mind.

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 29 Culminating Assessments: Writing Assignments A good writing assignment is: focused on a single guiding question. composed so that the task or invitation to write is clearly visible. scaffolded so that students –understand the connection to the work that precedes it, –see clearly what is being asked of them, and –find some help in imagining how to begin the writing.

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 30 The following three-part template is helpful when developing a writing assignment: 1 st paragraph/section: Situates the writing for students 2 nd paragraph/section: Writes out the request 3 rd paragraph/section: Offers some (but not too much) help to begin Culminating Assessments: Writing Assignments

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Develop the Culminating Assessment Working again in your pair/trio, develop the fourth central driver (culminating assessment) for your unit: write a brief version of the task in the culminating assessment box on the task sheet. identify which CCSS are being addressed by the culminating assessment. using your culminating assessment and the genre specific rubric, create a list of what students would need to know and be able to do to be successful on that assessment. 31

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Develop the Culminating Assessment Table Share Each pair/trio at the table will share the culminating assessment they developed. Whole Group Discussion 32

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Bridge to Practice Practice using qualitative rubrics and text placement template with sample texts from current textbooks; find 2- 3 complex texts of your own to sequence and teach to your students as a mini-unit.