Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (July 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Advertisements

Essential Role of ERK Dimers in the Activation of Cytoplasmic but Not Nuclear Substrates by ERK-Scaffold Complexes  Berta Casar, Adán Pinto, Piero Crespo 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Annapoorni Rangarajan, Sue J. Hong, Annie Gifford, Robert A. Weinberg 
A Combinatorial CRISPR-Cas9 Attack on HIV-1 DNA Extinguishes All Infectious Provirus in Infected T Cell Cultures  Gang Wang, Na Zhao, Ben Berkhout, Atze.
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Reduction in the requirement of oncogenic Ras signaling to activation of PI3K/AKT pathway during tumor maintenance  Kian-Huat Lim, Christopher M. Counter 
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Repurposing Pan-HDAC Inhibitors for ARID1A-Mutated Ovarian Cancer
Mutant IDH1 Promotes Glioma Formation In Vivo
Volume 137, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 137, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Kobe C. Yuen, Baoshan Xu, Ian D. Krantz, Jennifer L. Gerton 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Wenqi Wang, Nan Li, Xu Li, My Kim Tran, Xin Han, Junjie Chen 
Anupama Sahoo, Sanjaya K. Sahoo, Piyush Joshi, Bongyong Lee, Ranjan J
RasGRP3 Mediates MAPK Pathway Activation in GNAQ Mutant Uveal Melanoma
Figure 1. A CRISPR/Cas9 synthetic lethal screen with PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ in H2171 cell line. (A) A pie chart ... Figure 1. A CRISPR/Cas9 synthetic.
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
BMP4 Upregulation Is Associated with Acquired Drug Resistance and Fatty Acid Metabolism in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells  Duc-Hiep Bach,
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Bo-Kuan Wu, Charles Brenner  Cell Reports 
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Oncogenic Ras-Induced Expression of Noxa and Beclin-1 Promotes Autophagic Cell Death and Limits Clonogenic Survival  Mohamed Elgendy, Clare Sheridan,
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (September 2016)
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
Synthetic Lethal Screening Identifies Compounds Activating Iron-Dependent, Nonapoptotic Cell Death in Oncogenic-RAS-Harboring Cancer Cells  Wan Seok Yang,
A genome-wide RNAi pooled screen identifies NF1 as a key determinant of RAF inhibitor sensitivity in melanoma cells. A genome-wide RNAi pooled screen identifies.
Toyoaki Natsume, Tomomi Kiyomitsu, Yumiko Saga, Masato T. Kanemaki 
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
The BRAF Oncoprotein Functions through the Transcriptional Repressor MAFG to Mediate the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype  Minggang Fang, Jianhong Ou,
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
C-Raf Inhibits MAPK Activation and Transformation by B-RafV600E
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (July 2015)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
The role of SRC-C3G-RAP1 signaling in transformation induced by CRKL
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Loss of HDAC-Mediated Repression and Gain of NF-κB Activation Underlie Cytokine Induction in ARID1A- and PIK3CA-Mutation-Driven Ovarian Cancer  Minchul.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Shipra Das, Olga Anczuków, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Anticancer Activity of the Cholesterol Exporter ABCA1 Gene
The tumor-suppressive functions of the human INK4A locus
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 427-438 (July 2017) A Role for Mitochondrial Translation in Promotion of Viability in K-Ras Mutant Cells  Timothy D. Martin, Danielle R. Cook, Mei Yuk Choi, Mamie Z. Li, Kevin M. Haigis, Stephen J. Elledge  Cell Reports  Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 427-438 (July 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.061 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 20, 427-438DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.061) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Genome-wide CRISPR Screens in Isogenic Colorectal Tumor Cells Identifies Synthetic Lethal Interactions with Mutant K-Ras (A) Schematic of the CRISPR screens performed. Abundance of gRNAs was compared between the initial (PD0) and final (PD10) time points. Genes whose gRNAs are selectively depleted in the K-Ras mutant cells are putative synthetic lethal hits. (B) Fold changes of genes in the DLD1 screen. The average log2 fold change for each gene was calculated and plotted for both WT/− and WT/K-Ras mutant DLD1 cells. Labeled genes are a selection of potential synthetic lethal partners of mutant K-Ras. (C) Synthetic lethal genes that scored in both the HCT116 and DLD1 screens. (D) Average fold changes for the top 55 K-Ras synthetic lethal genes identified in the DLD1 screen. (E) Gene ontology terms enriched in putative K-Ras synthetic lethal genes. For screen sequencing data and analyses, see Tables S1, S2, S3, and S4. Cell Reports 2017 20, 427-438DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.061) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Mitochondrial Genes and Pathways Are Synthetic Lethal with Mutant K-Ras (A) Pathways enriched among the mitochondrial genes that are putatively synthetically lethal. (B) Mitochondrial genes identified in the DLD1 screen. (C) Depletion of the mitochondrial ribosome is synthetic lethal with mutant K-Ras. Components of the mitoribosome from the DLD1 screen and their associated false discovery rate (FDR) corrected p values. (D) Inhibition of mitochondrial translation is more toxic to K-Ras mutant cells. Isogenic DLD1 cells were treated with the mitochondrial translation inhibitor tigecycline, and proliferation was measured. (E) Inhibition of complex I of the respiratory chain is more toxic to K-Ras mutant cells. Colony formation of isogenic HCT116 cells treated with the complex I inhibitor rotenone. (F) Inhibition of either the mitoribosome or complex I reduces the anchorage-independent growth of K-Ras mutant cells. Soft agar colony formation was measured in K-Ras mutant cells treated with the indicated mitochondrial inhibitors. For all panels, ∗p < 0.05. All cellular growth and allograft data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Cell Reports 2017 20, 427-438DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.061) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 An shRNA Screen Targeting Essential Genes Identifies Additional Synthetic Lethal Partners with Mutant K-Ras (A) shRNA, but not CRISPR-based, screens can identify essential genes as synthetic lethal partners. Essential genes are universally lost in CRISPR-based screens, while shRNA-based screens can identify whether the reduced function of essential genes can be synthetically lethal. (B) An shRNA screen to identify essential genes that are synthetic lethal with mutant K-Ras in isogenic DLD1 cells. Heatmap showing the log2 fold change at PD3, PD7, and PD10 of essential genes that are putative synthetic lethal partners of mutant K-Ras. (C) Essential genes that are synthetic lethal with mutant K-Ras. Labeled genes are more strongly depleted in K-Ras mutant cells. (D) Knockdown of CCT1/TCP1 is synthetic lethal with mutant K-Ras. Colony formation of isogenic DLD1 cells expressing tet-inducible shRNAs for TCP1. (E) Knockdown of SAMM50 is synthetic lethal with mutant K-Ras. Colony formation of isogenic DLD1 cells expressing constitutively expressed shRNAs for SAMM50. For all panels, ∗p < 0.05. All cellular growth and allograft data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. For screen sequencing data and analysis, see Table S6. Cell Reports 2017 20, 427-438DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.061) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Engineering of K-Ras Mutant Isogenic Immortalized Primary Cells (A) Schematic of the KRAS locus and the targeting vector used to generate conditional K-Ras mutant alleles. A gRNA located near exon 2 and an AAV-delivered homology donor was used to generate LSL conditional HA-tagged K-Ras mutant cell lines. (B) Cre treatment leads to K-Ras mutant expression and activation. K-Ras activation was measured by Raf-RBD pull-downs in isogenic cells treated with either control GFP or Cre-expressing adenovirus. (C) Expression of mutant K-Ras leads to increased MAPK and PI3K signaling. LSL-K-Ras G12C AALE cells were treated with GFP or Cre-expressing adenovirus, and 7 days later, cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies to determine the activation of the PI3K and MAPK pathways, two effector pathways downstream of active K-Ras. (D) Endogenous mutant K-Ras expression leads to cellular transformation. LSL-K-Ras G12C AALE cells from (C) were placed in soft agar, and colony growth was quantified 4 weeks later. ∗p < 0.05. (E) K-Ras mutant expressing cells are more sensitive to complex I inhibition by rotenone. LSL-K-Ras G12C AALE cells from (C) were treated with rotenone to compare the sensitivity of K-Ras-mutant- and WT-expressing cells to oxidative phosphorylation inhibition. Cell viability was measured 2, 4, and 6 days after rotenone treatment. (F) Mitoribosome inhibition by tigecycline is more toxic to K-Ras-mutant-expressing cells. LSL-K-Ras G12C AALE cells from (C) were treated with tigecycline to compare the sensitivity of K-Ras-mutant- and WT-expressing cells to mitochondrial translation inhibition. Cell viability was measured 2, 4, and 6 days after tigecycline treatment. All cellular growth data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Cell Reports 2017 20, 427-438DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.061) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Knockout of Synthetic Lethal Genes or Inhibition of Complex I and the Mitoribosome Reduces K-Ras Mutant Cell Growth In Vivo (A) Knockout of Ndufb10 reduces the proliferation of CT26 tumor cells. Cas9 and gRNAs targeting either control Rosa26 or Ndufb10 were expressed in CT26 cells and immunoblotted for the indicated proteins (above) and measured for proliferation (below). NT, non-treated. (B) Mutation of Mrpl52 reduces the proliferation of CT26 tumor cells. Cas9 and gRNAs targeting either control Rosa26 or Mrpl52 were expressed in CT26 cells and immunoblotted for the indicated proteins (above) and measured for proliferation (below). NT, non-treated. (C) Mutation of either Ndufb10 or Mrpl52 reduces the anchorage-independent growth of CT26 tumor cells in soft agar. Cells from (A) and (B) were tested for anchorage -independent growth in soft agar, and colony number was quantified. (D) Mutation of either Ndufb10 or Mrpl52 reduces the in vivo tumor growth of CT26 tumor cells. CT26 cells expressing Cas9 and control Rosa26 gRNA or gRNAs targeting either Ndufb10 or Mrpl52 were subcutaneously injected as allografts in BALB/c mice, and tumor growth was measured over time. (E) CT26 cells are sensitive to complex I inhibition by VLX-600 and mitoribosome inhibition by tigecycline. CT26 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of VLX-600 or tigecycline to determine sensitivity to oxidative phosphorylation or mitochondrial translation inhibition, respectively. Cell viability was measured 72 hr after drug treatment, and IC50 values for each compound were determined. (F) Combined mitochondrial inhibition by VLX-600 and tigecycline reduces tumor growth. CT26 subcutaneous allografts were treated with the indicated inhibitors and concentrations, and tumor growth was monitored. All cellular growth and allograft data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Cell Reports 2017 20, 427-438DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.061) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions