Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states S. Scolletta, S.M. Romano, B. Biagioli,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Human factors in anaesthesia: lessons from aviation

Advertisements

Maternal deaths from anaesthesia

Five algorithms that calculate cardiac output from the arterial waveform: a comparison with Doppler ultrasound J. Zhang, L.A.H. Critchley, L. Huang

Relationship between Bispectral Index, electroencephalographic state entropy and effect-site EC50 for propofol at different clinical endpoints M. Iannuzzi,

Comparison of cardiac outputs during major surgery using the Deltex CardioQ oesophageal Doppler monitor and the Novametrix-Respironics NICO: A prospective.

Haemodynamic changes in trauma

A. Butwick, G. Hilton, B. Carvalho British Journal of Anaesthesia

E. Langesæter, L.A. Rosseland, A. Stubhaug

Comparison between pulse waveform analysis and thermodilution cardiac output determination in patients with severe pre-eclampsia R.A. Dyer, J.L. Piercy,

Treatment of pulmonary hypertension in the general adult intensive care unit: a role for oral sildenafil? J Ng, S.J. Finney, R Shulman, G.J. Bellingan,

Supplemental oxygen and surgical site infection: getting to the truth

Is comparison of changes in cardiac output, assessed by different methods, better than only comparing cardiac output to the reference method? N.W.F.

Antiemetic and analgesic-sparing effects of diphenhydramine added to morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia T.-F. Lin, Y.-C. Yeh, Y.-H. Yen,

Parkinson's disease and anaesthesia

J Barbara, M.-C. Santais, D.A. Levy, F Ruff, F Leynadier

Influence of haemorrhage on the pseudo-steady-state remifentanil concentration in a swine model: a comparison with propofol and the effect of haemorrhagic.

Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for cardiac output monitoring is biased by low peripheral resistance in patients with intracranial haemorrhage†

Comparison between an uncalibrated pulse contour method and thermodilution technique for cardiac output estimation in septic patients F. Franchi, R.

G Turner, M.J. Goldacre, T Lambert, J.W. Sear

Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports A. Abu-Arafeh,

A different use of visual analytic techniques in anaesthetics

B. Saugel, M. Cecconi, J.Y. Wagner, D.A. Reuter

N.T.M. Jack, E.B. Liem, L.H. Vonho¨gen British Journal of Anaesthesia

Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation

Less invasive determination of cardiac output from the arterial pressure by aortic diameter-calibrated pulse contour J.B. de Vaal, R.B.P. de Wilde, P.C.M.

EEG signal processing in anaesthesia

O. Thom, D. M. Taylor, R. E. Wolfe, J. Cade, P. Myles, H. Krum, R

Comparison of two versions of the Vigileo-FloTrac™ system (1. 03 and 1

The trend interchangeability method

Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions

C. Hällsjö Sander, M. Hallbäck, M. Wallin, P. Emtell, A. Oldner, H

Glycopyrrolate during sevoflurane–remifentanil-based anaesthesia for cardiac catheterization of children with congenital heart disease K. Reyntjens,

Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care B. Bataille, M. Bertuit, M. Mora,

D. Jee, D. Lee, S. Yun, C. Lee British Journal of Anaesthesia

Randomized controlled trial of the haemodynamic and recovery effects of xenon or propofol anaesthesia Coburn M. , Kunitz O. , Baumert J.-H. , Hecker.

A. Mekontso-Dessap, L. Tual, M. Kirsch, G. D'Honneur, D. Loisance, L

H. Beloeil, J.-X. Mazoit, D. Benhamou, J. Duranteau

The output of two sevoflurane vaporizers in the presence of helium

Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy—evolution of a technique that facilitates awake neurological testing A. Sarang, J. Dinsmore British Journal of Anaesthesia

Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation.

Predictive perioperative factors for developing severe sepsis after major surgery D. Mokart, M. Leone, A. Sannini, J.P. Brun, A. Tison, J.R. Delpero,

Reply Journal of Vascular Surgery

Comparison of cardiac output measured by oesophageal Doppler ultrasonography or pulse pressure contour wave analysis A. Caillard, E. Gayat, A. Tantot,

Tracheo-innominate artery fistula after percutaneous tracheostomy: three case reports and a clinical review C.A. Grant, G Dempsey, J Harrison, T Jones

Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block T Suzuki, N Fukano, O Kitajima,

S.G. Sakka, K. Reinhart, A. Meier-Hellmann

E. Saraceni, S. Rossi, P. Persona, M. Dan, S. Rizzi, M. Meroni, C. Ori

Interstitial muscle concentrations of rocuronium under steady-state conditions in anaesthetized dogs: actual versus predicted values Ezzine S. , Varin.

Similarity between the suprasystolic wideband external pulse wave and the first derivative of the intra-arterial pulse wave R.A. Payne, D. Isnardi, P.J.D.

Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies F.G.R. Freitas,

Pressure recording analytical method for measuring cardiac output in critically ill children: a validation study R. Saxena, A. Durward, N.K. Puppala,

P. Persson, O. Stenqvist, S. Lundin British Journal of Anaesthesia

Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars†

Effects of halothane, sevoflurane and propofol on left ventricular diastolic function in humans during spontaneous and mechanical ventilation† Filipovic.

Accuracy of respiratory rate monitoring using a non-invasive acoustic method after general anaesthesia O. Mimoz, T. Benard, A. Gaucher, D. Frasca, B.

Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin® does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patients A Hohn,

The effect of ephedrine on intubating conditions and haemodynamics during rapid tracheal intubation using propofol and rocuronium M.D. Gopalakrishna,

Comparison of central venous and external jugular venous pressures during repair of proximal femoral fracture† A.D. Leonard, C.M. Allsager, J.L. Parker,

Xenon produces minimal haemodynamic effects in rabbits with chronically compromised left ventricular function B. Preckel, W. Schlack, T. Heibel, H. Rütten

Comparison of ropivacaine 0. 5% (in glucose 5%) with bupivacaine 0

Incidence of adrenal insufficiency after severe traumatic brain injury varies according to definition used: clinical implications† F Bernard, J Outtrim,

Accuracy of impedance cardiography for evaluating trends in cardiac output: a comparison with oesophageal Doppler E. Lorne, Y. Mahjoub, M. Diouf, J.

Haemodynamic effects of oxytocin given as i. v

Influence of muscle relaxation on neuromonitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery F. Marusch, J. Hussock, G. Haring, T. Hachenberg,

Ability of esCCO to track changes in cardiac output†

A. Schlager, M. Boehler, F. Pühringer British Journal of Anaesthesia

Relationship between Bispectral Index, electroencephalographic state entropy and effect-site EC50 for propofol at different clinical endpoints M. Iannuzzi,

H.A. Leather, P.F. Wouters British Journal of Anaesthesia

Wee L. , Barron J. , Toye R. British Journal of Anaesthesia

Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy H.S. Abdel-Ghaffar,

Presentation transcript:

Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states S. Scolletta, S.M. Romano, B. Biagioli, G. Capannini, P. Giomarelli British Journal of Anaesthesia Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 159-165 (August 2005) DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei154 Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions

Fig 1 Bland and Altman plots for comparison between EM-CO and PRAM-CO in each haemodynamic state: (a) baseline 1; (b) hyperdynamic; (c) baseline 2; (d) haemorrhage. The unbroken lines show the mean difference (bias) and the dotted lines show the 95% limits of agreement. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 95, 159-165DOI: (10.1093/bja/aei154) Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions

Fig 2 Bland and Altman plots for comparison between ThD-CO and PRAM-CO in each haemodynamic state: (a) baseline 1; (b) hyperdynamic; (c) baseline 2; (d) haemorrhage. The unbroken lines show the mean difference (bias) and the dotted lines show the 95% limits of agreement. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 95, 159-165DOI: (10.1093/bja/aei154) Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions