Cell-Type-Specific Splicing of Piezo2 Regulates Mechanotransduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matthew R. Banghart, Bernardo L. Sabatini  Neuron 
Advertisements

Mark E.J. Sheffield, Michael D. Adoff, Daniel A. Dombeck  Neuron 
Isabella Maiellaro, Martin J. Lohse, Robert J. Kittel, Davide Calebiro 
Skin-Specific Expression of ank-393, a Novel Ankyrin-3 Splice Variant
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (January 2017)
Eija Siintola, Meral Topcu, Nina Aula, Hannes Lohi, Berge A
Jorge E. Ramirez, Brandon M. Stell  Cell Reports 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Alternative Splicing of the Robo3 Axon Guidance Receptor Governs the Midline Switch from Attraction to Repulsion  Zhe Chen, Bryan B. Gore, Hua Long, Le.
Somatosensory Substrates of Flight Control in Bats
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Touch Receptors Undergo Rapid Remodeling in Healthy Skin
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
TIGIT expression in naive T cells is accelerated by coculture with si-tolerant T cells at an early-stimulation stage. TIGIT expression in naive T cells.
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Representations of Taste Modality in the Drosophila Brain
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Widespread Inhibition of Posttranscriptional Splicing Shapes the Cellular Transcriptome following Heat Shock  Reut Shalgi, Jessica A. Hurt, Susan Lindquist,
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
A Map for Horizontal Disparity in Monkey V2
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (July 2016)
Nachiket Shembekar, Hongxing Hu, David Eustace, Christoph A. Merten 
Integrative Multi-omic Analysis of Human Platelet eQTLs Reveals Alternative Start Site in Mitofusin 2  Lukas M. Simon, Edward S. Chen, Leonard C. Edelstein,
Coiled Coils Direct Assembly of a Cold-Activated TRP Channel
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Peter A. Savage, Mark M. Davis  Immunity 
The Super-Cooling Agent Icilin Reveals a Mechanism of Coincidence Detection by a Temperature-Sensitive TRP Channel  Huai-hu Chuang, Werner M. Neuhausser,
Amanda H. Lewis, Alisa F. Cui, Malcolm F. McDonald, Jörg Grandl 
Hiroaki Matsunami, Linda B Buck  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
The Normalization Model of Attention
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Stephan D. Brenowitz, Wade G. Regehr  Neuron 
Volume 108, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
The Microtubule-Based Cytoskeleton Is a Component of a Mechanical Signaling Pathway in Fly Campaniform Receptors  Xin Liang, Johnson Madrid, Jonathon.
A Novel Family of Mammalian Taste Receptors
Calcium Release from Stores Inhibits GIRK
KCNE1 Binds to the KCNQ1 Pore to Regulate Potassium Channel Activity
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Fredrik Elinder, Michael Madeja, Hugo Zeberg, Peter Århem 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Coding and Plasticity in the Mammalian Thermosensory System
Phospholemman Modulates the Gating of Cardiac L-Type Calcium Channels
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Potent inhibition by ropivacaine of metastatic colon cancer SW620 cell invasion and NaV1.5 channel function  D.T. Baptista-Hon, F.M. Robertson, G.B. Robertson,
The Pore of the Voltage-Gated Proton Channel
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
TMEM150C/Tentonin3 Is a Regulator of Mechano-gated Ion Channels
Xiaowei Chen, Nathalie L. Rochefort, Bert Sakmann, Arthur Konnerth 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Piezo-like Gene Regulates Locomotion in Drosophila Larvae
Vikram A. Kanda, Anthony Lewis, Xianghua Xu, Geoffrey W. Abbott 
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (May 2015)
Cysteine Scanning of CFTR’s First Transmembrane Segment Reveals Its Plausible Roles in Gating and Permeation  Xiaolong Gao, Yonghong Bai, Tzyh-Chang Hwang 
Presentation transcript:

Cell-Type-Specific Splicing of Piezo2 Regulates Mechanotransduction Marcin Szczot, Leah A. Pogorzala, Hans Jürgen Solinski, Lynn Young, Philina Yee, Claire E. Le Pichon, Alexander T. Chesler, Mark A. Hoon  Cell Reports  Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 2760-2771 (December 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.035 Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 21, 2760-2771DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.035) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Piezo2 Is Highly Expressed in Heterogeneous Classes of Peripheral Sensory Neurons (A) Single-label ISH shows that Piezo2 is expressed at high levels in TG neurons (left panel); it is also expressed at lower levels in scattered cells in the lung and bladder (middle and right panels). (B) Double-label ISH reveals that Piezo2 (green) is found in neurons that are associated with sensation of low-threshold mechanical stimuli or are proprioceptive (Ntrk2, Ntrk3, Npy2r, and Th) and is present in HTMR neurons (Mrgprd). However, Piezo2 is virtually absent from cold-responsive neurons (Trpm8). Arrowheads indicate singly labeled neurons. (C) Quantification of ISH data shows the extent of overlap in expression with Piezo2: 41/42 Ntrk2 neurons (280 Piezo2 cells); 114/126 Ntrk3 neurons (232); 27/45 Npy2r neurons (242); 36/58 Th neurons (464); 35/46 Mrgprd neurons (464); and 1/38 Trpm8 neurons (232); 4–10 sections; n = 3 mice. Cell Reports 2017 21, 2760-2771DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.035) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Multiple Splice Isoforms of Mouse Piezo2 Are Alternatively Expressed in Neuronal and Non-neuronal Tissues (A) Alignment of sequencing reads of Piezo2 transcripts with the coding sequence of Piezo2 reveals that 5 exons are alternatively spliced and there are profound differences in splicing between neuronal and non-neuronal tissues. (B–D) Sequence reads from TG (B), lung (C), and bladder (D) are displayed as individual line plots; black indicates sequence identity and open areas regions of sequence lacking similarity (for clarity, junctions between exons are highlighted). Gray bars show the approximate percentage of sequence reads. Exons 17–41 of Piezo2 are colored in alternating blocks and pink blocks for alternatively spliced exons. (E) Analysis of reads from TG (upper panel) showed that 17 variants are expressed, whereas lung and bladder (middle panel) express one predominant form of Piezo2, V2. Lower panel is a schematic of the numbering system for splice variants. Cell Reports 2017 21, 2760-2771DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.035) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sequences Encoded by Alternately Spliced Exons Have Intracellular Locations (A) Alignment of the coding sequence of alternatively spliced exons from multiple species shows their high level of sequence similarity; amino acids identical to those of human Piezo2 are shaded gray. Numbering below sequence refers to the position in V16 mouse Piezo2 sequence. (B) Schematic representation of the proposed structure of Piezo2, based on sequence alignment of Piezo2 and Piezo1 and the predicted membrane topology of Piezo1 (Coste et al., 2015). The proposed positions of sequences encoded by alternatively spliced exons are indicated in blue as well as the approximate positions of amino acid for V16 mouse Piezo2. (B–E) The predicted intracellular location of alternatively spliced exons was confirmed by HA-epitope-tagging experiments. (C–E) Fields of HEK293 cells transfected with HA-epitope-tagged Piezo2 constructs were immune stained, live (upper panels) and following permeabilization (lower panels). HA epitope was engineered into E10 (C), E18 and E19 (D), and E40 (E). HA epitope was detected (red) only after membrane disruption in cells expressing E10 (HA), E18 (HA), and E40 (HA), confirming the sequences they encode have an intracellular location. (F) As expected, cells expressing extracellular N-terminally tagged TacR1 produced detectable epitope staining in both permeabilized and non-permeabilized cells. Note, all epitope-tagged Piezo2 constructs retained normal mechanically activated ion channel activity. Cell Reports 2017 21, 2760-2771DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.035) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Neuronal and Non-neuronal Splice Forms of Piezo2 Exhibit Different Calcium Permeability and Calcium-Induced Receptor Sensitization (A) Mechanically evoked responses of HEK293 cells expressing Piezo2 V2 and V14 show that the current of the non-neuronal splice form of Piezo2 differs from the neuronal variant at the indicated voltages, indicating a difference in relative calcium permeability. Cesium and calcium were the intracellular and extracellular cations, respectively. Lower panels schematize the exons usage of variant V2 and V14; these isoforms have opposite alternate splicing structures: gray boxes indicate presence of an exon and open boxes indicate the absence; all other regions in these constructs were identical. (B) Quantification of the relative permeability of calcium versus cesium for V2 and V14. Data represent means ± SEM (n = 22 for V2; n = 20 for V14); significant difference in calcium permeability between variants (Student’s t test) ∗p = 0.028 is shown. (C) Sample traces demonstrating dose dependence of mechanically activated currents in cells expressing different variants in nominally calcium-free intracellular solution (black) and high-calcium intracellular solution (green). Traces are normalized to dose response fit maximums. (D) The average fit of mechanically evoked currents for non-neuronal splice form, V2 (left panel), is not affected by intracellular calcium, whereas calcium decreases the indentation needed to gate V14 (right panel). Response profiles fits (middle trace represents the mean and outer traces SEM) were assessed by applying mechanical force (indentation of the plasma membrane) in the absence of intracellular calcium (black) and in the presence of 10 μM intracellular calcium (green). Note, leftward shift in mechanical threshold of V14 in the presence of intracellular calcium is shown (V2 calcium free n = 8; V2 high calcium n = 5; V14 calcium free n = 8; V2 high calcium n = 6) (E) Quantification of the calcium-induced shift in half-maximal force showed that V2 is insensitive to intracellular calcium, whereas V14 is sensitized. Data are means ± SEM (V2 calcium free n = 8; V2 high calcium n = 5; V14 calcium free n = 8; V2 high calcium n = 6); significant difference in response sensitivity for V14 between no calcium and 10 μM calcium (Student’s t test) ∗p = 0.0064 is shown, and for V2, it is not significant, p = 0.92. Cell Reports 2017 21, 2760-2771DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.035) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Neuronal and Non-neuronal Splice Forms of Piezo2 Exhibit Different Rates of Inactivation to Mechanical Stimulation The neuronal variant V14 inactivates to mechanical stimulation significantly faster than the non-neuronal V2 isoform of Piezo2. (A) Mechanically evoked membrane currents for HEK293 cells transfected with the non-neuronal V2 (left) and the neuronal V14 (right) variants. Increasing mechanical stimulation (upper panel) elicits greater current (lower panel). (B) Schematized exons usage of variants (see Figure 4 for details). (C) Quantification of inactivation kinetics for different Piezo2 variants shows that V14 has significantly faster rates of inactivation than V2, V18, and V23. Data are means ± SEM. V2 (n = 12), V8 (n = 16), V14 (n = 12), V16 (n = 9), V18 (n = 12), and V23 (n = 13) show significant difference in rates of inactivation between variants ∗ (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test) V14 versus V2 p = 0.009, V14 versus V8 p > 0.99, V14 versus V16 p > 0.99, V14 versus V18 p = 0.0029, and V14 versus V23 p = 0.0204. Cell Reports 2017 21, 2760-2771DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.035) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Subsets of Sensory Neurons Selectively Splice Exon 35, and Merkel Cells Express Restricted Classes of Piezo2 Splice Variants E35 is selectively spliced in Piezo2 transcripts expressed by LTMRs and proprioceptive neurons. (A) Analysis of NextGen sequence reads reveals that E35 is expressed at high levels in transcripts from non-Trpv1lineage neurons and at a lower level in transcripts from Trpv1lineage neurons. Exon reads were normalized to individual length of exons and to the overall Piezo2 reads in non-Trpv1lineage neuron and Trpv1lineage neuron datasets. (B) RT-PCR of cDNA from non-Trpv1lineage and Trpv1lineage neurons confirmed that there is significantly greater expression of E35 in non-Trpv1lineage neurons than Trpv1lineage neurons. Significant difference (Student’s t test) in expression between cell types were ∗p < 0.05 (means ± SEM; n = 3 samples). (C) Double-label ISH reveals that E35 (green) is expressed in many Ntrk3-positive neurons (purple; upper panel), but there is no co-expression of E35 with Mrgprd (purple; lower panel). (D) Comparison of the density of staining of positive profiles of Ntrk3 cells (purple) relative to those for E35 (green) shows there is high correspondence in the expression profiles of these two molecules. In contrast, there is very poor correspondence in the profiles stained for Mrgprd (purple) and E35 (green). Sequencing of Piezo2 from purified Merkel cell preparations reveals that they predominantly express V5. (E) Plot of reads from Piezo2 transcripts aligned to the coding sequence of Piezo2 (exons 17–41). (F) Structures of V5 and V2 splice variants of Piezo2. Note that E10 is also variably spliced in Piezo2 mRNA from Merkel cells. (G) Schematic of the location of Merkel cells illustrating their close association to hair follicles; Merkel cells are indicated in green and surround the root of a hair follicle. Double-label ISH of tissue from Atoh1-EGFP mice show that E35 (left) and E33 (right) are expressed with GFP (green). Individual Merkel cells and the position of a hair follicle are outlined. Cell Reports 2017 21, 2760-2771DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.035) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Human Piezo2 Is Alternatively Spliced Sequencing human Piezo2 transcripts reveals that six exons are alternatively spliced and that there are major differences in the splicing of Piezo2 in DRG and lung. (A) E16–41 are colored in alternating gray and open blocks with the junctions of alternatively spliced exons highlighted in pink. (B and C) Sequence reads from DRG (B) and from lung (C) are displayed as plots; black dots indicate sequence identity and open areas sequence lacking similarity. In DRG sensory neurons, E19, E33, E35, and E40 are variably spliced whereas E18 is present in most transcripts. In contrast, in lung, transcripts E18, E19, E35, and E40 are present rarely. See Figure S3 and Table S3 for details. Cell Reports 2017 21, 2760-2771DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.035) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions