X + Y Scheduling Models in Internal Medicine Residency Programs: A National Survey of Program Directors' Perspectives Craig Noronha, MD, FACP, Saima Chaudhry, MD, MSHS, Karen Chacko, MD, FACP, Kelly McGarry, MD, FACP, Anoop Agrawal, MD, Gopal Yadavalli, MD, FACP, Marc Shalaby, MD, FACP The American Journal of Medicine Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages 107-114 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.09.012 Copyright © 2018 Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Types of X + Y models used by various programs. The American Journal of Medicine 2018 131, 107-114DOI: (10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.09.012) Copyright © 2018 Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Reasons that program directors cite they did or did not move toward an X + Y scheduling model. The American Journal of Medicine 2018 131, 107-114DOI: (10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.09.012) Copyright © 2018 Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Benefits and challenges noted by ≥50% of program directors regarding X + Y scheduling models. The American Journal of Medicine 2018 131, 107-114DOI: (10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.09.012) Copyright © 2018 Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Terms and Conditions