A Putative Cyclic Nucleotide–Gated Channel Is Required for Sensory Development and Function in C. elegans  Cara M Coburn, Cornelia I Bargmann  Neuron 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (April 2001)
Mary Sym, Naomi Robinson, Cynthia Kenyon  Cell 
Mark M Metzstein, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2001)
Naoki Hisamoto, Chun Li, Motoki Yoshida, Kunihiro Matsumoto 
Massimo A. Hilliard, Cornelia I. Bargmann, Paolo Bazzicalupo 
Regulation of Presynaptic Terminal Organization by C
Paola Dal Santo, Mary A Logan, Andrew D Chisholm, Erik M Jorgensen 
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 (January 2004)
Identification of the Cell Fate Gene Stalky in Dictyostelium
Fluoxetine-Resistant Mutants in C
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Regulation of Body Size and Behavioral State of C
Paul D Baum, Gian Garriga  Neuron  Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Saikat Mukhopadhyay, Yun Lu, Shai Shaham, Piali Sengupta 
The Gα Protein ODR-3 Mediates Olfactory and Nociceptive Function and Controls Cilium Morphogenesis in C. elegans Olfactory Neurons  Kayvan Roayaie, Justin.
A Putative Cyclic Nucleotide–Gated Channel Is Required for Sensory Development and Function in C. elegans  Cara M Coburn, Cornelia I Bargmann  Neuron 
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Negative Regulation and Gain Control of Sensory Neurons by the C
The Conserved Immunoglobulin Superfamily Member SAX-3/Robo Directs Multiple Aspects of Axon Guidance in C. elegans  Jennifer A Zallen, B.Alexander Yi,
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Satoru Sonoda, Akane Ohta, Ayana Maruo, Tomoyo Ujisawa, Atsushi Kuhara 
Olfaction and Odor Discrimination Are Mediated by the C
Takashi Murayama, Jun Takayama, Mayuki Fujiwara, Ichiro N. Maruyama 
Volume 129, Issue 4, Pages (May 2007)
Elliot A. Perens, Shai Shaham  Developmental Cell 
Naoki Hisamoto, Chun Li, Motoki Yoshida, Kunihiro Matsumoto 
Lateral Signaling Mediated by Axon Contact and Calcium Entry Regulates Asymmetric Odorant Receptor Expression in C. elegans  Emily R. Troemel, Alvaro.
lin-35 and lin-53, Two Genes that Antagonize a C
Natural Variation in a Neuropeptide Y Receptor Homolog Modifies Social Behavior and Food Response in C. elegans  Mario de Bono, Cornelia I Bargmann  Cell 
Qiong A. Liu, Michael O. Hengartner  Current Biology 
Odorant Receptor Localization to Olfactory Cilia Is Mediated by ODR-4, a Novel Membrane-Associated Protein  Noelle D Dwyer, Emily R Troemel, Piali Sengupta,
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Massimo A. Hilliard, Cornelia I. Bargmann  Developmental Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 1996)
Dynamics of Presynaptic Diacylglycerol in a Sensory Neuron Encode Differences between Past and Current Stimulus Intensity  Hayao Ohno, Naoko Sakai, Takeshi.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Kang Shen, Richard D Fetter, Cornelia I Bargmann  Cell 
Odr-10 Encodes a Seven Transmembrane Domain Olfactory Receptor Required for Responses to the Odorant Diacetyl  Piali Sengupta, Joseph H Chou, Cornelia.
Dpl-1 DP and efl-1 E2F Act with lin-35 Rb to Antagonize Ras Signaling in C. elegans Vulval Development  Craig J. Ceol, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
The Role of RNA Editing by ADARs in RNAi
MAX-1, a Novel PH/MyTH4/FERM Domain Cytoplasmic Protein Implicated in Netrin- Mediated Axon Repulsion  Xun Huang, Hwai-Jong Cheng, Marc Tessier-Lavigne,
The ced-8 Gene Controls the Timing of Programmed Cell Deaths in C
The CMK-1 CaMKI and the TAX-4 Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channel Regulate Thermosensory Neuron Gene Expression and Function in C. elegans  John S. Satterlee,
Volume 14, Issue 24, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2001)
Justin Gage Crump, Mei Zhen, Yishi Jin, Cornelia I. Bargmann  Neuron 
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Hulusi Cinar, Sunduz Keles, Yishi Jin  Current Biology 
Peter Swoboda, Haskell T. Adler, James H. Thomas  Molecular Cell 
Extracellular Proteins Needed for C. elegans Mechanosensation
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Functional Genomics of the Cilium, a Sensory Organelle
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages (September 2005)
Brent Neumann, Massimo A. Hilliard  Cell Reports 
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

A Putative Cyclic Nucleotide–Gated Channel Is Required for Sensory Development and Function in C. elegans  Cara M Coburn, Cornelia I Bargmann  Neuron  Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 695-706 (October 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80201-9

Figure 1 Responses of tax-2 Mutants to Volatile Odorants Each data point represents the average of at least eight independent assays using ∼100–200 well fed adult animals per assay (error bars equal the SEM). The dilution of odorants in ethanol were the following: 1:200 benzaldehyde (bz), 1:100 isoamyl alcohol (ia), 10 mg/ml pyrazine (pyr), 1:1000 diacetyl (di), and 1:1000 2,4,5-trimethylthiazole (tmt). Selected alleles were also tested to a range of odorant dilutions at 10×, 1×, and 0.1× the standard odorant dilution (e.g., benzaldehyde was tested at 1:20, 1:200, and 1:2000). Butanone (bt), an AWC-sensed odorant, was tested at 1:100, 1:1000, and 1:10,000. Neuron 1996 17, 695-706DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80201-9)

Figure 2 Localization and Sequence Analysis of tax-2 (A) Localization of the tax-2 gene. Cosmid T18D4 and subclones were tested for rescue of the chemotaxis and amphid axon defects of tax-2(p691). For each experiment, the number of independent transformed lines that rescued the tax-2 mutant phenotype is given as a fraction of the total number of lines tested. Rescue was scored if a line had a chemotaxis index ≥0.6, or had >50% normal amphid axon morphology assessed by dye filling (this assay reveals ASJ axons but not ASE axons). Inset diagram shows tax-2 genomic organization with the location of the p694 deletion and the p671, ky139, p691, and ks31 mutations indicated. Boxes depict exons. GFP expression plasmids are described in Experimental Procedures. An inverted triangle indicates the restriction site at which a frameshift mutation was created. Abbreviations: B, BamHI; Bg, BglII; Bs, BsaBI; H, HindIII; S, SalI. (B) A rooted parsimonious tree of cyclic nucleotide–gated channel protein sequences from the first transmembrane domain through the cyclic nucleotide–binding site. Tree was calculated using the Phylogeny Inference Package of programs (Felsenfeld 1989). Prefixes: h, human; r, rat; f, catfish. (C) Predicted amino acid sequence of the tax-2 cDNA and sequence comparisons. The comparison between the predicted amino acid sequences of the tax-2 cDNA, the short form of the human rod cyclic nucleotide–gated channel β subunit (hRCNC2; Chen et al. 1993), and the rat olfactory cyclic nucleotide–gated channel α subunit (rOCNC1; Dhallan et al. 1990) is shown. Identical residues are shaded. Amino acids are numbered beginning at the first methionine. Predicted transmembrane domains and the cyclic nucleotide–binding domain are underlined. The location of the p694 deletion and the p671, ky139, p691, and ks31 mutations are indicated along with the predicted amino acid alterations. The predicted ATG used in the p694 deletion mutant and in clone p[tax-2Δ::GFP] is marked by an asterisk. Neuron 1996 17, 695-706DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80201-9)

Figure 2 Localization and Sequence Analysis of tax-2 (A) Localization of the tax-2 gene. Cosmid T18D4 and subclones were tested for rescue of the chemotaxis and amphid axon defects of tax-2(p691). For each experiment, the number of independent transformed lines that rescued the tax-2 mutant phenotype is given as a fraction of the total number of lines tested. Rescue was scored if a line had a chemotaxis index ≥0.6, or had >50% normal amphid axon morphology assessed by dye filling (this assay reveals ASJ axons but not ASE axons). Inset diagram shows tax-2 genomic organization with the location of the p694 deletion and the p671, ky139, p691, and ks31 mutations indicated. Boxes depict exons. GFP expression plasmids are described in Experimental Procedures. An inverted triangle indicates the restriction site at which a frameshift mutation was created. Abbreviations: B, BamHI; Bg, BglII; Bs, BsaBI; H, HindIII; S, SalI. (B) A rooted parsimonious tree of cyclic nucleotide–gated channel protein sequences from the first transmembrane domain through the cyclic nucleotide–binding site. Tree was calculated using the Phylogeny Inference Package of programs (Felsenfeld 1989). Prefixes: h, human; r, rat; f, catfish. (C) Predicted amino acid sequence of the tax-2 cDNA and sequence comparisons. The comparison between the predicted amino acid sequences of the tax-2 cDNA, the short form of the human rod cyclic nucleotide–gated channel β subunit (hRCNC2; Chen et al. 1993), and the rat olfactory cyclic nucleotide–gated channel α subunit (rOCNC1; Dhallan et al. 1990) is shown. Identical residues are shaded. Amino acids are numbered beginning at the first methionine. Predicted transmembrane domains and the cyclic nucleotide–binding domain are underlined. The location of the p694 deletion and the p671, ky139, p691, and ks31 mutations are indicated along with the predicted amino acid alterations. The predicted ATG used in the p694 deletion mutant and in clone p[tax-2Δ::GFP] is marked by an asterisk. Neuron 1996 17, 695-706DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80201-9)

Figure 3 tax-2 Protein Is Expressed in Sensory Neurons and Is Localized to Both the Sensory Cilia and the Axons (A) GFP expression driven by the tax-2::GFP construct, which includes the upstream sequences and the first intron (see Figure 2c). Left-lateral view of a transgenic worm showing the GFP-expressing AWC, AFD, ASE, ASG, ASJ, ADE, and BAG neurons. The GFP-expressing ASK, ASI, and AWB neurons are out of this plane of focus. A construct that contained only the upstream sequences drove GFP expression in the neurons AWC, AFD, ASE, ASI, ADE, BAG, and occasionally ASK (data not shown). All constructs were expressed occasionally in the tail sensory neuron PQR; a phasmid neuron (PHA or PHB) was also seen rarely. Anterior is to the left, and dorsal is up. (B) GFP expression driven by the tax-2Δ::GFP construct, which lacks the promoter and most of the first intron (mimicking the tax-2(p694) deletion; see Figure 2A). Left-lateral view of a transgenic worm showing the GFP-expressing neurons AWB, AWC, ASG, ASI, ASK, and ASJ. The positions of the sensory neurons are diagrammed at right. Anterior is to the left, and dorsal is up. (C) Localization of the Tax-2::GFP tagged protein. Left-lateral view of a transgenic animal expressing the GFP-tagged Tax-2 protein. Intense staining in the sensory cilia and axons is diagrammed in black, while weaker staining in the dendrites and cell bodies is diagrammed in gray. Anterior is at left, and dorsal is up. (D) Higher resolution view of Tax-2::GFP in the sensory cilia, generated by constrained iterative deconvolution. Dorsal view of the two bilaterally symmetrical AWC sensory cilia showing expression of the tagged Tax-2 protein. Other sensory cilia are out of the plane of focus. Anterior is at the top. Diagrammed dots indicate punctate staining in the dendrites. Scale bar, 5 μm. Neuron 1996 17, 695-706DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80201-9)

Figure 4 Developmental Defects of tax-2 and tax-4 Mutants Visualized by DiO Staining (A) DiO staining of wild-type adult animal. Left-lateral view of one amphid showing dendrites, cell bodies, and axons of six amphid neurons. The normal position of the neuron ASJ is marked in (A)–(C). Some DiO staining is observed in the gut. In all cases, anterior is to the left and dorsal is up. Positions of the staining neurons are diagrammed. (B) Left-lateral view of a DiO-stained tax-2 mutant adult, showing an aberrant amphid neuron process projecting posteriorly from the nerve ring. tax-4 animals have an identical phenotype. (C) Left-lateral view of a DiO-stained tax-2 mutant adult, showing an aberrant process projecting laterally from the ASJ neuron into the posterior body region. tax-4 animals have an identical phenotype. (D) DiO staining of wild-type phasmid neurons. Left-lateral view of one phasmid sensory organ showing dendrites, cell bodies, and axons of two phasmid sensory neurons. The normal termination point of the phasmid axons is marked. (E) Left-lateral view of a tax-2 mutant adult phasmid. The normal termination point of the phasmid axon is indicated. The tax-4 mutant phenotype is identical. Neuron 1996 17, 695-706DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80201-9)

Figure 5 Chemotaxis and Axon Guidance Defects of tax-2; tax-4 Double Mutants For responses of tax-2; tax-4 double mutant combinations to volatile odorants, each data point represents the average of 4–8 independent assays using ∼100–200 animals per assay (error bars equal the SEM). The dilution of odorants in ethanol were the following: 1:200 benzaldehyde, 1:100 isoamyl alcohol, 10 mg/ml pyrazine, 1:1000 diacetyl, and 1:1000 2,4,5-trimethylthiazole. For amphid axon defects of tax-2, tax-4, and tax-2; tax-4 double mutants, data points refer to the percentage of normal amphids (error bars denote the 95% confidence level). For each point, 200–700 DiO-stained adults were viewed; this assay reveals ASJ axons but not ASE axons. An amphid was scored as defective if any amphid neuron had a defect. Neuron 1996 17, 695-706DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80201-9)

Figure 6 tax-4 Overexpression Rescues tax-2 Mutant Phenotypes (A) Benzaldehyde chemotaxis of tax-2(p691) animals overexpressing tax-4 genomic DNA. Each data point represents the average of eight to ten independent assays using ∼100–200 animals per assay (error bars equal the SEM). kyEx131, kyEx142, and kyEx143 are independent transgenic lines carrying extrachromosomal arrays of the tax-4 rescuing clone and the coinjection marker. NaCl chemotaxis was also rescued in the transgenic strains (data not shown). Overexpression of p[tax-2] in tax-4(p678) did not rescue the tax-4 chemotaxis phenotypes (data not shown). (B) Amphid axon defects of tax-2(p691) animals overexpressing tax-4 genomic DNA. Data points refer to the percentage of normal amphid axons (error bars equal the 95% confidence level). For each point, 200 DiO-stained adults were viewed. An amphid was scored as defective if any amphid neuron had a defect. Overexpression of the tax-2 genomic DNA in tax-4(p678) did not rescue the tax-4 amphid neuron defects (data not shown). Neuron 1996 17, 695-706DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80201-9)