The SREBP Pathway in Drosophila

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bid, a Bcl2 Interacting Protein, Mediates Cytochrome c Release from Mitochondria in Response to Activation of Cell Surface Death Receptors  Xu Luo, Imawati.
Advertisements

Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Xianxin Hua, Axel Nohturfft, Joseph L Goldstein, Michael S Brown  Cell 
Adam L. Hughes, Bridget L. Todd, Peter J. Espenshade  Cell 
Apaf-1, a Human Protein Homologous to C
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (August 2000)
Shitao Li, Lingyan Wang, Michael A. Berman, Ye Zhang, Martin E. Dorf 
Volume 8, Issue 15, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Arginine Methylation of STAT1 Modulates IFNα/β-Induced Transcription
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Xianxin Hua, Axel Nohturfft, Joseph L Goldstein, Michael S Brown  Cell 
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Multiple PKCδ Tyrosine Residues Are Required for PKCδ-Dependent Activation of Involucrin Expression—a Key Role of PKCδ-Y311  Ling Zhu, Chaya Brodie, Sivaprakasam.
Identification and Characterization of an IκB Kinase
Ras Enhances Myc Protein Stability
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Crucial Step in Cholesterol Homeostasis
Volume 1, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 132, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Calnexin Controls the STAT3-Mediated Transcriptional Response to EGF
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Zhonglin Mou, Weihua Fan, Xinnian Dong  Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Role of the regulatory domain of the EGF-receptor cytoplasmic tail in selective binding of the clathrin-associated complex AP-2  Werner Boll, Andreas.
Monica Kong-Beltran, Jennifer Stamos, Dineli Wickramasinghe 
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Characterization of Keratinocyte Differentiation Induced by Ascorbic Acid: Protein Kinase C Involvement and Vitamin C Homeostasis1  Isabella Savini, Antonello.
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
TRADD–TRAF2 and TRADD–FADD Interactions Define Two Distinct TNF Receptor 1 Signal Transduction Pathways  Hailing Hsu, Hong-Bing Shu, Ming-Gui Pan, David.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (March 1998)
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Silva H Hanissian, Raif S Geha  Immunity 
Gp78, a Membrane-Anchored Ubiquitin Ligase, Associates with Insig-1 and Couples Sterol-Regulated Ubiquitination to Degradation of HMG CoA Reductase  Bao-Liang.
Dap1/PGRMC1 Binds and Regulates Cytochrome P450 Enzymes
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
SUR-8, a Conserved Ras-Binding Protein with Leucine-Rich Repeats, Positively Regulates Ras-Mediated Signaling in C. elegans  Derek S Sieburth, Qun Sun,
Cvt19 Is a Receptor for the Cytoplasm-to-Vacuole Targeting Pathway
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
RORγt, a Novel Isoform of an Orphan Receptor, Negatively Regulates Fas Ligand Expression and IL-2 Production in T Cells  You-Wen He, Michael L Deftos,
Insig-mediated degradation of HMG CoA reductase stimulated by lanosterol, an intermediate in the synthesis of cholesterol  Bao-Liang Song, Norman B. Javitt,
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
N-Terminal Palmitoylation of PSD-95 Regulates Association with Cell Membranes and Interaction with K+ Channel Kv1.4  J.Rick Topinka, David S Bredt  Neuron 
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (July 1997)
Transport-Dependent Proteolysis of SREBP
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

The SREBP Pathway in Drosophila Adam C. Seegmiller, Irina Dobrosotskaya, Joseph L. Goldstein, Y.K. Ho, Michael S. Brown, Robert B. Rawson  Developmental Cell  Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 229-238 (February 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00119-8

Figure 1 Drosophila Orthologs of SREBP Pathway Components Hydropathy plots of the amino acid sequences of components of the human SREBP pathway (upper panels) and their Drosophila counterparts (lower panels) are shown, plotted by the method of Kyte and Doolittle (1982) over a window of 20 amino acids. The overall amino acid sequence identities of the Drosophila proteins to their mammalian orthologs are hSREBP-1a, 26%; hSREBP-2, 23%; S1P, 42%; S2P, 26%; and SCAP, 24%. These values are calculated from pairwise alignments using the Clustal algorithm in the DNAStar software package (LaserGene). The length of each sequence is indicated in amino acids (aa). Heavy bars denote regions of high sequence identity. For example, the percent identity between hSREBP-1 and dSREBP in the bHLH zipper domain is 82% as compared to 80% identity between hSREBP-1 and hSREBP-2. For S1P, the three residues comprising the catalytic triad are shown. For S2P, the sequences of the zinc binding motif and accessory ligand are shown. For SCAP, the location of two point mutations in the sterol-sensing domain that produce a dominant, constitutively active phenotype in CHO cells (Hua et al., 1996; Nohturfft et al., 1996) are shown. GenBank accession numbers are as follows: dSREBP (HLH106), U38238; dSCAP, AF441759; dS1P, AF441758; and dS2P, AF441757. Developmental Cell 2002 2, 229-238DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00119-8)

Figure 2 Detection of dSREBP Protein in S2 Cells by Immunoblotting On day 0, S2 cells were set up in medium A as described in Experimental Procedures. On day 2, cells were transfected in medium A with 3 μg/dish of either empty vector (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or pDS47-HSV-dSREBP (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8). After incubation in medium A for 8 hr, the cells were washed and refed medium C. After an additional 16 hr, cells were harvested and fractionated into membrane and nuclear extract fractions as described in Experimental Procedures. Aliquots of protein (10 μg/lane) from transfected cells were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with either 50 ng/ml of monoclonal anti-HSV (A) or 2 μg/ml of monoclonal anti-dSREBP (IgG-3B2; [B]). The filters were exposed to film for 5 s. P and N denote the precursor and nuclear cleaved forms of dSREBP, respectively. Developmental Cell 2002 2, 229-238DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00119-8)

Figure 3 RNAi-Mediated Inhibition of dSREBP Expression and Its Effects on Target Gene Expression in S2 Cells On day 0, S2 cells were suspended in medium B containing 50 μg of the indicated dsRNA per 106 cells and then plated as described in Experimental Procedures. (A) Immunoblot analysis of dSREBP in membranes and nuclear extracts. On day 2, cells were harvested, and aliquots of protein (20 and 15 μg/lane, respectively) from the indicated cell fraction were analyzed by immunoblotting with IgG-3B2. Film was exposed for 30 s. P and N denote the precursor and nuclear cleaved forms of dSREBP, respectively. (B) Northern blot analysis of target genes. Total RNA was isolated from the cells in the same experiment as shown in (A), and aliquots (20 μg) were analyzed by denaturing electrophoresis followed by Northern blotting with the indicated probes. Filters were exposed at −70°C for 2–48 hr. (C) Immunoblot analysis of dSREBP in whole-cell extracts. On days 1, 2, and 3, fresh medium B containing 50 μg of the indicated dsRNA was added to each well. Cells were harvested on day 4 and lysed in RIPA buffer (Gielkens et al., 1976) supplemented with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2 mM MgCl2, and protease inhibitors (Hua et al., 1995). Aliquots of total cell protein (40 μg/lane) were analyzed by immunoblotting with monoclonal IgG-3B2 against dSREBP. Film was exposed for 40 s. Developmental Cell 2002 2, 229-238DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00119-8)

Figure 4 Proteolytic Processing of dSREBP in S2 Cells Is Regulated by Palmitate, but Not by Sterols On day 0, S2 cells were set up in medium A as described in Experimental Procedures. (A) On day 2, cells were refed medium C containing either no additions, sterols (10 μg/ml cholesterol plus 1 μg/ml 25-hydroxycholesterol), or 100 μM sodium palmitate. All culture medium was adjusted to contain 0.2% (w/v) BSA and 0.2% (v/v) ethanol. (B) On day 2, cells were refed medium C containing the indicated concentration of sodium palmitate. All culture medium was adjusted to contain 0.2% BSA. (A and B) After incubation for 4 hr, cells were harvested, and membrane and nuclear extract fractions were prepared as described in Experimental Procedures. Aliquots of protein (2.5 μg) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with 2 μg/ml monoclonal anti-dSREBP (IgG-3B2). The filters were exposed to film for either 10 s (A) or 1 min (B). Developmental Cell 2002 2, 229-238DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00119-8)

Figure 5 Palmitate Regulates Proteolytic Processing of dSREBP at Site 1 On day 0, S2 cells were set up in medium A as described in Experimental Procedures. On day 2, cells were transfected with 3 μg empty vector (lanes 1 and 2) or 100 ng of the indicated wild-type or mutant version of pAC-HSV-dSREBP. In each case, the total amount of transfected DNA in each dish was adjusted to 3 μg with empty vector. After 16 hr, the cells were washed and refed medium B supplemented with either 0.2% BSA or 100 μM sodium palmitate (16:0). After an additional incubation for 4 hr (A) or 6 hr (B), cells were harvested, and membrane and nuclear extract fractions were prepared as described in Experimental Procedures. Aliquots of protein (2.5 μg/lane of membrane fraction; 15 μg/lane of nuclear extract) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with 50 ng/ml of monoclonal anti-HSV. The filters were exposed to film for either 30 s (A) or 1 min (B). Developmental Cell 2002 2, 229-238DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00119-8)

Figure 6 Palmitate, but Not Other Fatty Acids, Regulates Proteolytic Processing of dSREBP in S2 Cells On day 0, S2 cells were set up in medium A as described in Experimental Procedures. On day 2, cells were refed medium C containing the indicated fatty acid at a final concentration of 100 μM. All culture medium was adjusted to contain 0.2% BSA. After incubation for 4 hr, cells were harvested, and membrane and nuclear extract fractions were prepared as described in Experimental Procedures. Aliquots of protein (2.5 μg) were analyzed as described in Figure 2B. The filters were exposed to film for 30 s ([A], membranes) or 2 min ([A and B], nuclear extracts; [B], membranes). P and N denote precursor and nuclear cleaved forms of dSREBP, respectively. Developmental Cell 2002 2, 229-238DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00119-8)