Tandem Histone Folds in the Structure of the N-Terminal Segment of the Ras Activator Son of Sevenless  Holger Sondermann, Stephen M Soisson, Dafna Bar-Sagi,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Mark E. Zweifel, Daniel J. Leahy, Doug Barrick  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Structural Characterization of the Boca/Mesd Maturation Factors for LDL-Receptor-Type β Propeller Domains  Mark N. Collins, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Mark E. Zweifel, Daniel J. Leahy, Doug Barrick  Structure 
Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Danny N.P Doan, Terje Dokland  Structure 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure, Exchange Determinants, and Family-Wide Rab Specificity of the Tandem Helical Bundle and Vps9 Domains of Rabex-5  Anna Delprato, Eric Merithew,
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages (March 2003)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Crystal Structure of a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, MTMR2
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages (August 2001)
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Crystal Structure of the Human Myeloid Cell Activating Receptor TREM-1
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Crystal structures of Nova-1 and Nova-2 K-homology RNA-binding domains
The AXH Domain Adopts Alternative Folds
Architecture of a Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Tandem Histone Folds in the Structure of the N-Terminal Segment of the Ras Activator Son of Sevenless  Holger Sondermann, Stephen M Soisson, Dafna Bar-Sagi, John Kuriyan  Structure  Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 1583-1593 (December 2003) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2003.10.015

Figure 1 Domain Structure of the Sos Protein (A) Boundaries of the domains of Sos. The construct used for structure determination consists of residues 1–191 of human Sos1, denoted “Histone domain.” PxxP motifs are SH3 domain binding sites. DH domains are found in GDP/GTP exchange factors for the Rho family of GTPases (RhoGEFs). PH domains bind to phosphatidyl inositol phosphate (PIP). (B) Partial proteolysis of the histone fold of human Sos. Purified protein spanning residues 1–191 of human Sos1 was incubated in the presence or absence of increasing amounts of the protease Subtilisin (from 0 to 5 mg/ml final protease concentration) for 30 min on ice. Reactions were stopped with 10 mM PMSF, and protein fragments were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS). Note the slight reduction in the apparent molecular mass of the band corresponding to the histone fold, which is due to a loss of 5 C-terminal residues of the protein. Controls show the undigested protein and the protease alone at the highest concentration used. Similar results were obtained with Elastase, Trypsin, and Chymotrypsin. Structure 2003 11, 1583-1593DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.10.015)

Figure 2 Sequence Alignment and Structure of the Histone Domain (A) Sequence alignment of the histone domain of Sos proteins and nucleosomal core histone H2A. The alignment was generated using ClustalW (Henikoff and Henikoff, 1993). Strictly conserved residues are indicated by red boxes, similar residues by orange and yellow boxes. Secondary structure elements corresponding to the histone fold structure of Sos are depicted as gray boxes for α helices and lines for coil regions. Accession numbers are as follows: human Sos1, Q07889; mouse Sos1, Q62245; human Sos2, Q07890; Drosophila melanogaster Sos, P26675; Anopheles gambiae Sos, XP_319944; Caenorhabditis elegans, NP_504235; human histone H2A, NP_254280. (B) Structure of the monomeric, self-capped tandem histone folds of Sos. Stereo ribbon representation of the structure of molecule D is shown. Secondary structure elements are labeled according to the numbering in Figure 2A. Red traces show the H2A homology region (second histone fold), and green structural elements depict regions of the N-terminal histone fold of Sos (first histone fold). (C) Cartoon representation of the isolated histone folds and comparison with the nucleosomal core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. The N-terminal and the C-terminal histone folds of Sos are colored as in (B). Nucleosomal histone fold structures were taken from the nucleosome octamer structure (PDB code: 1KX5; Davey et al., 2002). Structure 2003 11, 1583-1593DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.10.015)

Figure 3 Interfacial Surfaces between the First and Second Histone Folds of Sos (A) Residues of the second histone fold identified as being part of buried interface are shown as solid surface and colored according to their hydrophobicity (Eisenberg et al., 1984). Hydrophobic residues are shown in green. The solvent-accessible surface of the second histone fold of Sos is shown as a mesh representation. The first histone fold of Sos is shown in a cartoon representation. (B) The solvent-accessible surface of the first histone fold of Sos is shown as mesh, and interfacial residues are shown as solid surface. The second histone fold is shown in a cartoon representation. Coloring is identical to (A). Thumbnails show the orientation of the two views of the structure, separated by a 180° rotation around the y axis. Structure 2003 11, 1583-1593DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.10.015)

Figure 4 Comparison of the Histone Domain of Sos with the Structures of Various Histone Proteins Superpositions were generated by TOP3D (Lu, 2000). The histone domain of Sos is shown in gray. The darker gray represents the C-terminal H2A homology region. Rms deviations for the Cα backbone atoms between structures being compared are indicated. Alignment with the nucleosomal core histone dimers H2A/H2B (A) and H3/H4 (B) are shown. H2A is colored in light green, H2B in dark green. H3 and H4 are shown in orange and red, respectively (PDB code: 1KX5; Davey et al., 2002). (C) Alignment with Methanopyrus kandleri histone (PDB code: 1F1E; Fahrner et al., 2001). Structure 2003 11, 1583-1593DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.10.015)

Figure 5 Surface Properties of the Histone Domain of Sos (A) Representation of a histone protomer (molecule D) in two orientations. Orientations are preserved in Figures 5B and 5C. (B) Sequence conservation of the histone domain of Sos as depicted in Figure 2 is mapped onto the surface. Conservation from 0%–100% is presented as color gradient from green to gray to red. Identical residues are colored in red, similar residues (>90% conserved) are shown in orange. (C) Hydrophobicity of the histone domain surface according to the Eisenberg hydrophobicity scale (Eisenberg et al., 1984). Hydrophobic residues are shown in green, polar and charged residues are in gray and pink, respectively. Structure 2003 11, 1583-1593DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.10.015)

Figure 6 Structure of the Nucleosome Core Particle (A) The histone octamer (PDB code: 1KX5; Davey et al., 2002) is shown as surface presentation. Histone tails have been removed from the structure for clarity. The H3:H4 dimers are shown in black and red; H2A:H2B dimers are shown in green and yellow. (B) Cartoon presentation of one H3:H4 dimer (black molecules in [A]) in two orientations similar to the one of the histone domain of Sos in Figure 5. Secondary structure elements are indicated. (C) Surface presentations of the H3:H4 dimer are shown in the same orientation as in (B). Colors indicate buried surface areas within the nucleosome octamer using color coding as in (A). Green and yellow areas are interfaces with the H2A:H2B dimers, and red represents the contact surface with the other H3:H4 dimer. Structure 2003 11, 1583-1593DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.10.015)

Figure 7 Multiangle Light Scattering Analysis of the Histone Domain of Sos in Solution (A) Purified protein (4 mg/ml) was analyzed by coupled gel filtration/multiangle light scattering. The mobile phase consists of 25 mM Tris-HCL (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, and 2 mM DTT. The yellow area highlights the analyzed peak. The primary signal (in volts) is plotted against the elution volume. Red traces show the signal of one of the light scattering detectors (at 90° to the incident beam). In blue, the signal from the refractive index detector is shown. (B) Molecular weights determined by light scattering and concentration determination from each data slice (0.5 s increments) are plotted against the elution time. Protein concentration was measured by change of refractive index as shown in the solid line. (C) Purified protein at 16 mg/ml was subjected to light scattering as described in (A). The monomeric peak is highlighted in yellow, and higher molecular weight peaks are shown in gray. Structure 2003 11, 1583-1593DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.10.015)

Figure 8 Noncrystallographic Symmetry in the Crystals of the Sos Histone Domain (A) The central trimer (molecules D, E, and F) is shown. Surface area buried at the three interfaces was calculated using CNS. (B) Assembly in the unit cell. Three trimers form an open helical nonamer. Colors indicate equivalent protomers within the nonameric assembly. All C termini point to the outside of the assembly, as depicted by black surface presentation. C termini for molecules B, D, F, and H are in the back of the assembly, but are surface exposed. Structure 2003 11, 1583-1593DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2003.10.015)