Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Advertisements

Effects of Myrtus communis extract treatment in bile duct ligated rats
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Contribution of nitric oxide to the pathogenesis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy in bile duct– ligated rats  Hongqun Liu, Zenghua Ma, Samuel S. Lee  Gastroenterology 
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Elevated hepatic SULT1E1 activity in mouse models of cystic fibrosis alters the regulation of estrogen responsive proteins  Li Li, Charles N. Falany 
Reduced nitric oxide production by endothelial cells in cirrhotic rat liver: Endothelial dysfunction in portal hypertension  Don C. Rockey, John J. Chung 
Volume 143, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2012)
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Abdi Ghaffari, Ruhangiz T. Kilani, Aziz Ghahary 
Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 146, Issue 5, Pages e1 (May 2014)
Smad7 gene transfer inhibits peritoneal fibrosis
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages e5 (October 2009)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 125, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Borislava Haralanova-Ilieva, Giuliano Ramadori, Thomas Armbrust 
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
This Month in Gastroenterology
Role of Connective Tissue Growth Factor in Oval Cell Response During Liver Regeneration After 2-AAF/PHx in Rats  Liya Pi, Seh-Hoon Oh, Thomas Shupe, Bryon.
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Modulation of Hepatic Fibrosis by c-Jun-N-Terminal Kinase Inhibition
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
PPARα agonist fenofibrate improves diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Reactive cholangiocytes differentiate into proliferative hepatocytes with efficient DNA repair in mice with chronic liver injury  Rita Manco, Laure-Alix.
Volume 127, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
The Melanocortin 5 Receptor is Expressed in Human Sebaceous Glands and Rat Preputial Cells  Diane Thiboutot, Aruntha Sivarajah, Kathryn Gilliland, Zhaoyuan.
Domenico Alvaro, Alessandro Gigliozzi, Adolfo F. Attili 
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Increased Expression of Wnt2 and SFRP4 in Tsk Mouse Skin: Role of Wnt Signaling in Altered Dermal Fibrillin Deposition and Systemic Sclerosis  Julie Bayle,
Syed M. Meeran, Thejass Punathil, Santosh K. Katiyar 
Overexpression of Fetuin-A Counteracts Ectopic Mineralization in a Mouse Model of Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum (Abcc6−/−)  Qiujie Jiang, Florian Dibra, Michael.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Chien-Te Lee, Viet M. Huynh, Li-Wen Lai, Yeong-Hau H. Lien 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Expression of Opsin Molecule in Cultured Murine Melanocyte
MicroRNA-125b Promotes Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Liver Fibrosis by Activating RhoA Signaling  Kai You, Song-Yang Li, Jiao Gong, Jian-Hong Fang,
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 383-390 (February 2006) Osteopontin expression in normal and fibrotic liver. Altered liver healing in osteopontin- deficient mice  Dionne Lorena, Ian A. Darby, Alain-Pierre Gadeau, Laetitia Lam Shang Leen, Susan Rittling, Luís C. Porto, Jean Rosenbaum, Alexis Desmoulière  Journal of Hepatology  Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 383-390 (February 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.024 Copyright © 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Osteopontin mRNA expression in total mouse liver extracts. Osteopontin mRNA expression is detectable in normal liver as shown by Northern blot. After bile duct ligation, a progressive increase in osteopontin mRNA expression is observed between 3, 5, and 7 days. After CCl4 treatment, an important increase in osteopontin mRNA is observed very early with a decrease at 4 days; at 2 and 6 weeks, osteopontin mRNA expression is again increased. The graph shows the mean osteopontin/GAPDH values from three animals per time point. BDL: bile duct ligation. Journal of Hepatology 2006 44, 383-390DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.024) Copyright © 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization for osteopontin in normal and fibrotic mouse (a–c) and rat (d–i) liver. By immunohistochemistry, osteopontin is detected in normal mouse and rat liver only in biliary epithelial cells (a, d). After bile duct ligation, mouse (b) and rat (e) proliferating biliary epithelial cells express osteopontin; in situ hybridization confirms a high level of osteopontin mRNA expression in rat proliferating biliary epithelial cells (f). Two days after the beginning of the CCl4 treatment, inflammatory cells in necrotic areas around centrolobular veins express both osteopontin protein (c, g) and mRNA (h). After 6 weeks of CCl4 treatment in rats, osteopontin is exclusively present in biliary epithelial cells which proliferate when the development of the lesions (initially in centrolobular areas) involves portal areas (i). PV: portal vein; CLV: centrolobular vein. Journal of Hepatology 2006 44, 383-390DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.024) Copyright © 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Immunohistochemistry for osteopontin and ED1 in CCl4-treated rat liver. Two days after the beginning of the CCl4 treatment, inflammatory cells in a necrotic area around a centrolobular vein express both osteopontin (a) and ED1 (b), a monocyte/macrophage marker. Journal of Hepatology 2006 44, 383-390DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.024) Copyright © 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Expression of osteopontin (a, c) and of β-actin (b, d) transcripts in mouse (a, b) and rat (c, d) hepatocytes (lanes 3, 4, 5) and hepatic stellate cells (lanes 6, 7). The lane 1 contains molecular weight markers; the lane 2 represents a RT reaction where the reverse transcriptase was omitted. Three different isolations of hepatocytes were used (lanes 3, 4, 5). Hepatic stellate cell mRNA extraction were performed after 2 (lane 6) and 8 (lane 7) days in culture. Amplification of β-actin with specific primers confirms the efficiency of the RT reaction. The PCR products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel. The sizes of the predicted products are 491 and 206bp, respectively, for mouse and rat osteopontin, and 361bp for β-actin. Journal of Hepatology 2006 44, 383-390DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.024) Copyright © 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Hematoxylin-eosin staining (a, b), and immunohistochemistry for F4/80 (c, d) in wild-type (a, c) and osteopontin-deficient (b, d) mice after CCl4 treatment. Three days after a single dose of CCl4, necrotic areas (dotted lines) are increased in osteopontin-deficient mice (b) compared with wild-type mice (a). The number of F4/80 positive cells around centrolobular veins is decreased in osteopontin-deficient mice (d) compared with wild-type mice (c). Journal of Hepatology 2006 44, 383-390DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.024) Copyright © 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Liver fibrosis induced by CCl4 treatment in osteopontin-deficient mice compared with wild-type mice. The quantitative evaluation (a) shows that fibrosis is significantly increased at 2 weeks after the beginning of CCl4 treatment in osteopontin-deficient mice compared with wild-type mice (n=12; P<0.01). With Sirius red staining, a slight collagen deposition is observed within centrolobular areas in wild-type mice (b) while delicate septa are present in osteopontin-deficient mice (c). Journal of Hepatology 2006 44, 383-390DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.024) Copyright © 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 iNOS expression in CCl4-treated osteopontin-deficient mice compared with CCl4-treated wild-type mice. As a positive control for iNOS (+), peritoneal macrophages of mice treated with lipopolysaccharide for 1 day were used. The upper part of the figure shows representative Western blotting for three wild-type mice and three osteopontin-deficient mice. Equivalent loading was confirmed by Ponceau staining of the blot. To further confirm the loading, blots were rehybridized with a mouse monoclonal antibody against β-actin. The signals were detected at 130kDa for iNOS and 45kDa for β-actin. The signals were quantified (arbitrary units) with the Kodack 1D Image Analysis Software (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY). Data were calculated as mean values±SEM. A Student's t-test for unpaired samples was used for statistical analysis. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. The graph shows the mean iNOS/β-actin values from five animals per time point. iNOS expression is significantly reduced in osteopontin-deficient mice compared with wild-type mice (P<0.02). Journal of Hepatology 2006 44, 383-390DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.024) Copyright © 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions